Alright, Nom, according to your logic, next time we find a problem in the rules, we'll just keep silent and exploit it. Hey, it'd be poor form, but certainly better because we won't be 'hypocrites', right?
edit:
No, but the only thing that match proved is that we are better than you at Port Assault, and you are better than us at Field by the River. Because we had defender, we won the match. If you were defender, and picked FBTR both times, then the same problem would've occurred but in your favor. This is problematic, because it hardly shows if a team is better overall, just that they're better at their defending map. Even if we didn't pick Port Assault, and picked Nord Town, another closed map, and won, it would only show we're better at closed maps, and not overall.
edit:
Mr.X 说:Holy **** guys. It came down to a single round. Doesn't seem like the 5-0 0-5 5-0 bs that you guys are talking about. Calm down and shut up
No, but the only thing that match proved is that we are better than you at Port Assault, and you are better than us at Field by the River. Because we had defender, we won the match. If you were defender, and picked FBTR both times, then the same problem would've occurred but in your favor. This is problematic, because it hardly shows if a team is better overall, just that they're better at their defending map. Even if we didn't pick Port Assault, and picked Nord Town, another closed map, and won, it would only show we're better at closed maps, and not overall.








