Native Completed [NASTe] North American Small Teams Seasonal Ladder [Season 2]

正在查看此主题的用户

状态
不接受进一步回复。
MadocComadrin 说:
Or you could wait a week for the next version of Madmin, where I introduce [SECRET]! (maybe this weekend/middle of next week).
Add an easier way to install the thing please. All dat code hurts my head.
 
I haz text and full source included. D':
(And eventually other secrets. Secrets that could change modding M&B in general for ages to come!)
 
MadocComadrin 说:
I haz text and full source included. D':
(And eventually other secrets. Secrets that could change modding M&B in general for ages to come!)
Do they include nice .exes? Ra currently uses vinchenzos mod just because it is so easy for everyone, but Madmin has some nice features that would be pretty.
 
captain lust 说:
Figured this is worth dumping here:

http://forums.taleworlds.com/index.php/topic,189676.0.html

New Admin mod, which has all the useful features and is suitable for competitive play but unlike Vincenzo's, it's based on Warband 1.143, so all the weapon and troop stats are properly up to date.

It also has optional features for things like ID checking and the ENL custom maps. Obviously you don't need to use any of that stuff.

Does this require the server and the client side to be on 1.143? I've been playing with 1.134 both because I am too lazy to upgrade and because of all the bugs introduced in 1.143 (shield break crashes, etc.).

I really like being able to give out free spec to some rather than having all on locked.
 
MadocComadrin 说:
Or you could wait a week for the next version of Madmin, where I introduce [SECRET]! (maybe this weekend/middle of next week).

I don't know if Warband is going to last another week.
 
Rhade 说:
MadocComadrin 说:
Or you could wait a week for the next version of Madmin, where I introduce [SECRET]! (maybe this weekend/middle of next week).

I don't know if Warband is going to last another week.

I give it at least 8 days.  :razz:
 
Er, kind of weird match.

I personally went on a roller coaster ride of emotions ("Yes! We're going to have 8!" "What!? Only 5?" "Thank god, we have 6." "Wat?"

So, first map was

0-5 to CRAP. (We were just warming up!)

Then 2-3 to CRAP (In the middle of a comeback!)

Then we only had 5, I think we're waiting an hour but I'm not sure, so all in all my face is " :???:"
 
MrNomNom 说:
International 说:
*sighs*

Seems to me that CRAP will never recieve a rank :/

Now now, to receive a rank, you have to win!

trolol

CRAP is more than capable of doing that :wink:
 
Yeah, we kinda found that out.  :razz:

Less than an hour later, we have 6, but Catholic wanted a reschedule. >.> So yeah, we could be playing now. <.<

And a second thing, why can't we play 5 v 5? It'd make a world of a difference. For both times LAG came up against CRAP, LAG had 5 or more players.
 
MrNomNom 说:
Yeah, we kinda found that out.  :razz:

Less than an hour later, we have 6, but Catholic wanted a reschedule. >.> So yeah, we could be playing now. <.<

And a second thing, why can't we play 5 v 5? It'd make a world of a difference. For both times LAG came up against CRAP, LAG had 5 or more players.
Not to mention if the rule was honestly you could play 3 rounds with 5 instead of 2, there would be a possibility that it'd be over.

And my apologies for running. An old friend I haven't seen in three years showed up at my door. Old memories die hard, and it began to storm. Looking forward to the second map, would prefer it quickly. How's Monday?
 
Sorry but the rules are absolutely killing the ladder. Either add flexibility, or punish the team that can't make the players.

Currently, teams that can't find enough players are just being rewarded time and again, while we're stuck without a match played. This is ****ing madness and I don't understand why the ladder admins can't see it.
 
Catholic 说:
MrNomNom 说:
Yeah, we kinda found that out.  :razz:

Less than an hour later, we have 6, but Catholic wanted a reschedule. >.> So yeah, we could be playing now. <.<

And a second thing, why can't we play 5 v 5? It'd make a world of a difference. For both times LAG came up against CRAP, LAG had 5 or more players.
Not to mention if the rule was honestly you could play 3 rounds with 5 instead of 2, there would be a possibility that it'd be over.

And my apologies for running. An old friend I haven't seen in three years showed up at my door. Old memories die hard, and it began to storm. Looking forward to the second map, would prefer it quickly. How's Monday?

I think 5 players for each team should be chosen as the minimum. Also, Monday is a good day, we can finish the scrim then :smile:
 
状态
不接受进一步回复。
后退
顶部 底部