

MrNomNom 说:3 minutes and Ra has two people.
What the ****.

ryizzel 说:
Outlawed 说:ryizzel 说:
Well, the rule specifies that the 'occurrence' is us not having enough people at the scheduled time.
This never happened before. Any scheduling that happened before the final time seems irrelevant, as by the rule.
The rescheduling occurred before that Thursday, so it's not like we rescheduled after the initial Thursday time.

Alright here's the deal Nom proposed two times he team could fight on, you first accepted Thursday then rescheduled it to Saturday. That's your first reschedule there. Now you confirmed your match time Saturday 4pm EST on October 12,2011 10:18:54 PM. That's was over 48 hours ago you had enough time to find out if you would be able to make the match or not imo. So I suggest you learn to consult your team before confirming a match, and if you see you cant make it post even if its 30 min before the match. This matter has been handled by Ladder admin (not me).Outlawed 说:MrNomNom 说:3 minutes and Ra has two people.
What the ****.
First of all. Calm yourself lol.
Secondly. According to the rules, if we are unable to present you with enough people within 20 minutes of the initial scheduled time we "may reschedule with their opponent in the first instance of this occurrence"
You're not going to force a win Noms. This is the first time we have a scheduled time and we don't have enough show up. Which means we can reschedule. What's in question now is when your European contingent can play their matches. You know how the NA system works, usually, 7-8 + EST is what everyone does on Weekends. We don't know how your Euros times fit, so if you could provide a range of times, that would be great.

Mr.X 说:My suggestion for the rest of the tournament is that no match should be counted unless it was properly scheduled.
, but Ra PM'd LAG saying that thursday wouldn't work and that they would be able to do the other proposed time (which was today).
Clearly the scheduling between these two teams is not working
Outlawed 说:ryizzel 说:
Well, the rule specifies that the 'occurrence' is us not having enough people at the scheduled time.
This never happened before. Any scheduling that happened before the final time seems irrelevant, as by the rule.
The rescheduling occurred before that Thursday, so it's not like we rescheduled after the initial Thursday time.
Mr.X 说:1. First off, the match was not scheduled properly. If you want to schedule a match, do it in PMs and have at least 1 admin present in the message
Mr.X 说:2. There isn't enough here for LAG to earn an autowin. Technically I'm going to say that this is only the first infringment on the numbers rule for Ra (within this match). The match was originally set for Thursday, but Ra PM'd LAG saying that thursday wouldn't work and that they would be able to do the other proposed time (which was today). Now we have come to the time of the match and Ra does not have sufficient numbers.
Mr.X 说:3. Clearly the scheduling between these two teams is not working, so I'd rather not have them attempt at rescheduling. We also want to avoid autowins as much as possible as they mess up the numbers on the leaderboard.



Outlawed 说:Lol. Ilovedetest the European highhorse, YET AGAIN.
Outlawed 说:The match on Thursday was cancelled. Its not like we agreed to Thursday, didn't show up on that time, and the rescheduled. We cancelled well before the match time (more than 2 days before). So both teams knew that Thursday, even though it was confirmed initially was canceled for that day. So I don't want to hear the nonsense of that counting as a reschedule on the spot, like stated in the rules. (Where a team doesn't have sufficient players). Consider, for a moment, that we didn't want to play because our best players weren't on? Consider for a moment, that we didn't choose Thursday because our callouts leader wasn't on? But of course, you are SO win hungry at this stage that you don't hied to these calls.
Outlawed 说:Also, if you had a problem with the rules, NOW, is not the time to be talking about them. There was plenty of time before things got on the way and you could have commented on them, but the fact is your were too lazy to do so until it concerned you. Its the pinnacle of hypocrisy really.
Outlawed 说:Lol. Ilovedetest the European high-horse, YET AGAIN.
But firstly, I'll address Zero; keep your opinions to yourself. We'll address our scheduling problems. Google 'define: we'. Thanks.
Ra is one of the most active clans in this community mr.Euro. Don't go about trying to shoot us out of this when the matter at hand is both a lesson to the whole participating pool and an issue at hand is a simple, solvable one.
The match on Thursday was cancelled. Its not like we agreed to Thursday, didn't show up on that time, and the rescheduled. We cancelled well before the match time (more than 2 days before). So both teams knew that Thursday, even though it was confirmed initially was canceled for that day. So I don't want to hear the nonsense of that counting as a reschedule on the spot, like stated in the rules. (Where a team doesn't have sufficient players). Consider, for a moment, that we didn't want to play because our best players weren't on? Consider for a moment, that we didn't choose Thursday because our callouts leader wasn't on? But of course, you are SO win hungry at this stage that you don't hied to these calls.
Also, if you had a problem with the rules, NOW, is not the time to be talking about them. There was plenty of time before things got on the way and you could have commented on them, but the fact is your were too lazy to do so until it concerned you. Its the pinnacle of hypocrisy really.
That being said, we accept the cancellation and are open for challenges.