Native Completed [NASTe] North American Small Teams Seasonal Ladder [Season 2 Finals]

Season 3 Duel Ladder Format (ALL FIGHTS ARE 1v1)

  • Singles (Two players, one set, best of 13)

    Votes: 20 39.2%
  • Doubles (Four players, two sets, best of 13, winners duel for tiebreaker)

    Votes: 12 23.5%
  • Team (3 player teams, round-robin format, highest scoring team wins)

    Votes: 19 37.3%

  • Total voters
    51

Users who are viewing this thread

Orion said:
Vaegirs & Sarranids no longer max out their archers on the first spawn, for instance. Strong cavalry play becomes more important in the early game for these factions when archers aren't quite as powerful. Nords are less armored in the first and second waves, which could actually mean more throwing axes early on.
I get one hit killed whether naked or in full armor so... Miza no carez... and more throwing axes... OH GAWD!
 
16-1 LAG, silly. I'll post screenies later.

One major problem was that I thought it was first to 4, not a total of 4. Our last round was 4-1, when it should of ended at 3-1. Also, there was a dispute over money.

And, rerolls took 7 minutes while the map itself took 8. :l

P.P.P.S We played a 5 v 5, MF has a limited number of those left.
 
MrNomNom said:
16-1 LAG, silly. I'll post screenies later.

One major problem was that I thought it was first to 4, not a total of 4. Our last round was 4-1, when it should of ended at 3-1. Also, there was a dispute over money.
I need to work on my adding  :oops: and srry bout King rage quitting
 
MrNomNom said:
P.P.P.S We played a 5 v 5, MF has a limited number of those left.

Negative, I'm not going to penalize MF for one of their members rage-quitting the whole team. Smells like silly drama, and I won't fuel that fire.

[Edit]

Also, I need the screenshot of the first half of the second map from LAG vs. MF. Please do not resize it. Here are the screenshots I have:

https://tw.greywool.com/i/ulIoY.jpg
https://tw.greywool.com/i/68ZtO.jpg
https://tw.greywool.com/i/5EgPR.jpg

The map ending in 4-1 will be counted as 3-1. Player stats will have to be recorded as shown. :neutral:
 
Orion said:
MrNomNom said:
P.P.P.S We played a 5 v 5, MF has a limited number of those left.

Negative, I'm not going to penalize MF for one of their members rage-quitting the whole team. Smells like silly drama, and I won't fuel that fire.

[Edit]

Also, I need the screenshot of the first half of the second map from LAG vs. MF. Please do not resize it. Here are the screenshots I have:

https://tw.greywool.com/i/ulIoY.jpg
https://tw.greywool.com/i/68ZtO.jpg
https://tw.greywool.com/i/5EgPR.jpg

The map ending in 4-1 will be counted as 3-1. Player stats will have to be recorded as shown. :neutral:

Well in my infinite widom i forgot to take any screenshots but im pretty sure the one you are missing is when we were nords and it was 4-0 LAG
 
Good Game! Good job tonight MrNevino.

Our team looked sharp. You organized them well in such a short time.

Nobody should request random plains. That was ridiculous.

The first page has the rules up to date. We should not have anymore delays regarding those rules.

150% starting gold
100% round & bonus gold
100% friendly fire to friend
0% to self
melee and ranged friendly fire enabled
ranged enabled
minimum armor not enforced
map time 60 minutes or more
round time 6 minutes
battle game type
server password agreed upon by both teams
fastest combat speed
spectator locked to team

I had a blast. Great job Drake and Antonidas.

Do we have a place to put a team thread?
 
bajatmerc said:
Nobody should request random plains. That was ridiculous.

...

Do we have a place to put a team thread?

The rule regarding random plains will probably be slightly changed for more convenience.

If you want a subforum for NASTe, bother captain lust about it. Last time I asked the answer was "the tournament isn't big enough to justify its own board."

[Edit]

Completely remade my sorting algorithm for generating the stats table. Should work just fine, now.
 
I have made the request to Captain Lust, for us to have a sub forum.

I also was thinking about how forums have spoilers. It would be interesting if forums had an operator that consisted of a key and value.

Like a spoiler with a lock on it that someone needed a key to view. Just a random idea.
 
Back
Top Bottom