Mount & Blade Warband version 1.161 patch
- Thread starter captain lust
- Start date
Users who are viewing this thread
- Status
I must know what this DLC is! That's it, I'm invading Taleworlds to spy on it. Anyone want to come with me?
Heroes_Witch_King
I'll come with you if you buy me an airplane ticket to TurkeyEomarthofRohan said:
Sir_Don_Quixote
Banned
Prade said:
I tried infiltrating but the fire-breathing lazer-shooting spider-sense ironclad elephants were too tough security guards for me to get through.
PoisonCourtesan
Count
Wtf, DLC?
Hope it's not developed by Brytenwalda team and I hope it is some sort of extension to native.
Hope it's not developed by Brytenwalda team and I hope it is some sort of extension to native.
Pumpkin Lord
Hope its not brytenwalda indeed.
PoisonCourtesan said:
Belendor said:
Very few developer teams deserve monetary recompense for their effort and work. Brytenwalda are one of those few; dudes have been here from the beginning and have worked hard on delivering a unique and deep single player experience since then. They're a damn sight more deserving of it than Mount & Musket ever was.
Inanch-Bilge
Why people doesn't wants Brytenwalda team ?
Pumpkin Lord
Leifr Eiríksson said:
You are right, though that is not my reason. I played Brytenwalda and rest of the community did as well. It is just my self-opinion, which I had when M&M was turned into NW, that the mods with slightly-modified content usually has a few core mechanics which are usually unchanged after it became DLC. And, I played the project loving those mechanics, had fun(Even got inspired for my own projects.) and done with it. So pretty much, it comes to this; Why would I pay for a game I played before? Other than, contributing to my own collection of M&B series. (I will buy the DLC anyway.)
To me, Brytenwalda is around for too long to become the next DLC.
Isn't there difference between people behind Brytenwalda working on new DLC and Brytenwalda becoming DLC?
Pumpkin Lord
Yes, I hope it is Brytenwalda working on new DLC.
Sir_Don_Quixote
Banned
its probs a carribean update lel
Fantu
Knight
DrTomas said:
I take a look to Brytenwalda features list and seems very good, I not tried it for now, someone can tell me if latest version (1.41) is full compatible with warband 1.160/1.161? I saw that was rebased on 1.157.
Someone can tell me if is also fully compatible with linux/mac? (textures/opengl shaders)
Is also enogh stable? For example I'm now playing ACOK that is very beautiful and have many similar/same features but is heavy bugged
some hundreds of its bugs (major are minors) maybe I've only noticed because of my "professional deformation" ^^''Thanks for any reply and sorry for my bad english.
About the new DLC I hope in a very good singleplayer, native is good and I played it since starts of linux beta over 180 hours but it has some deficiencies (many of which are small and quick to do) that waste the game, for example my faction where I conquired about a third of caldaria would still be good to go if it were not for the sieges "blockers" and vassals impossible to please as I am committed.
About the siege I opened one post here:
http://forums.taleworlds.com/index.php?topic=311488
Also a ping for another question on new version:
Inanch-Bilge
You know what would be awesome, an allstar team, most talented modders gathered together for a project and technically supported by Taleworlds team, now I would pay for this.
Docm30 comes to my mind first.
Docm30 comes to my mind first.
Tribblegoggles
Recruit
Crossing my fingers for a Rome Multiplayer mod!
- Status
