please read read my post. I know titanium is not an invention. I wrote that myself.gindling said:in the same vein steel is the best steel and since titanium hadn't been invented*. there is no such thing as magic meteor metal. the only exception to this is damascan steel which would be nice to see in the game.
Well actually titanium wasn't invented, its a naturally occurring metal, it was the process to smelt it that was invented.
There were plenty of cultures that used meteorites as metal for their swords since they were lacking in terrestrial iron deposits but you are right, there are no special properties for it, its just common iron and nickel mostly. Though through the smelting process carbon could be added to make it steel and hold an edge. In the East, damascus (wootz steel) was at first an unintentional byproduct of the smelting process which added layers of perlite to the steel that made the wavy grain pattern while in the West , Vikings mostly, it was called pattern welded steel and used only as a decorative element. Then in the mid ground, notably the Persians, both were used for some really outstanding looking weapons. But damascus steel is in no way superior to any other steel, just a hell of a lot prettier.
MrMundy said:They obviously do. If you check steam, you can see that sometimes 8000 players (that being the ones online) play the game, while only about 1000 play Mutliplayer.
MrMundy said:Open Multiplayer, apply filters, and then just set everything so that you have an empty list. You can see the number of filterd players on the top right.
kraggrim said:MrMundy said:Open Multiplayer, apply filters, and then just set everything so that you have an empty list. You can see the number of filterd players on the top right.
Ah cheers, I though he meant you could see through steam somehow.
8300 in steam, 1700 in multiplayer. Plus more SP offline/non-steam as he said. Seems fairly definitive, unless there's something I'm missing then maybe we can put this discussion to rest .
Edit: I another factor might be to do with when clans/regiments choose to organise their activities or something. Dunno how big a chunk of the player base is actually involved in that though.
I stopped playing MP because of the majority of players being assholes who have nothing better to do but to TK all the time.VonTwat said:I find it surprising that so many people actually seem to prefer SP over MP. I usually play MP myself and most of my total play time consists of MP.
Golradir said:The only reason M&B is still around is because of its multiplayer and mods for it. Taleworlds should stick to what has made the series successful and I can tell you it is not sp
you missed the joke where i replaced the post from the guy above me whining about that mp needs to **** off with spPlovercrest said:Golradir said:The only reason M&B is still around is because of its multiplayer and mods for it. Taleworlds should stick to what has made the series successful and I can tell you it is not sp
Then M&B would just be another of the many MP only medieval games on steam. A quality SP game in this genre is hard to find.
They should add crafting and resource farming, just to be competitive with the rest.
kraggrim said:MrMundy said:Open Multiplayer, apply filters, and then just set everything so that you have an empty list. You can see the number of filterd players on the top right.
Ah cheers, I though he meant you could see through steam somehow.
8300 in steam, 1700 in multiplayer. Plus more SP offline/non-steam as he said. Seems fairly definitive, unless there's something I'm missing then maybe we can put this discussion to rest .
Edit: I another factor might be to do with when clans/regiments choose to organise their activities or something. Dunno how big a chunk of the player base is actually involved in that though.
Envious_Elazul said:kraggrim said:MrMundy said:Open Multiplayer, apply filters, and then just set everything so that you have an empty list. You can see the number of filterd players on the top right.
Ah cheers, I though he meant you could see through steam somehow.
8300 in steam, 1700 in multiplayer. Plus more SP offline/non-steam as he said. Seems fairly definitive, unless there's something I'm missing then maybe we can put this discussion to rest .
Edit: I another factor might be to do with when clans/regiments choose to organise their activities or something. Dunno how big a chunk of the player base is actually involved in that though.
There is currently a lot of different events going on at the moment, Saturday evening is quite busy. Just checked and there is about 10 000 players in Warband, 7000 doing singleplayer and 3000 doing multiplayer.
Golradir said:Apparently you guys are playing on the wrong servers if you get teamkilled all the time
you missed the joke where i replaced the post from the guy above me whining about that mp needs to **** off with spPlovercrest said:Golradir said:The only reason M&B is still around is because of its multiplayer and mods for it. Taleworlds should stick to what has made the series successful and I can tell you it is not sp
Then M&B would just be another of the many MP only medieval games on steam. A quality SP game in this genre is hard to find.
They should add crafting and resource farming, just to be competitive with the rest.
I'd be cautious with that statement. the medieval multiplayer genre* is much more saturated by other games. I also wonder if your statement about the size of the medieval multiplayer scene is really that large compared to the mount and blade single layer scene. it is more vocal though resulting in a closer community.Yabloko said:I don't get the SP vs MP debate.
SP is simply more popular than MP because that's the original target audience, and the other side of the coin hasn't been developed to the fullest extent. The multiplayer market is a huge and ever-growing one with the potential to surpass any other kind, and TW would be mad to not try to get even just a fraction of it, considering how solid and fun is Warband's fighting system.