-
If you are reporting a bug, please head over to our Technical Support section for Bannerlord.
Users who are viewing this thread
- Status
LoL at Taleworlds thinking Bannerlord can beat War of the Roses.
Good luck, you'll need it.
/run inside nuclear bunker.
Good luck, you'll need it.
/run inside nuclear bunker.
user1324865215
Thanks for the edits goker <3
WeetchKing
Recruit
Armaury said:Killing a noble or a lord should be possible only if you're really powerfull however it would kill you're reputation and renown with the faction, maybe killing bad karma lord will not
I noticed there is a slot for cloaks
There is probably destructible environnement and i hope there will be fire arrows and you can burn villages !
+1
Why lose renown when killing lords? If anything you would gain more renown, more people would know you and talk about you. Only losing honor or some other system would be fine.
A noble wasn't allowed to kill another noble without a good reason.WeetchKing said:Armaury said:Killing a noble or a lord should be possible only if you're really powerfull however it would kill you're reputation and renown with the faction, maybe killing bad karma lord will not
I noticed there is a slot for cloaks
There is probably destructible environnement and i hope there will be fire arrows and you can burn villages !
+1
Why lose renown when killing lords? If anything you would gain more renown, more people would know you and talk about you. Only losing honor or some other system would be fine.
They preferred to capture them.
Its historically accurate.
RabbleKnight said:A noble wasn't allowed to kill another noble without a good reason.WeetchKing said:Armaury said:Killing a noble or a lord should be possible only if you're really powerfull however it would kill you're reputation and renown with the faction, maybe killing bad karma lord will not
I noticed there is a slot for cloaks
There is probably destructible environnement and i hope there will be fire arrows and you can burn villages !
+1
Why lose renown when killing lords? If anything you would gain more renown, more people would know you and talk about you. Only losing honor or some other system would be fine.
They preferred to capture them.
Its historically accurate.
Nonetheless lords died. Disease, old age, accident, assassination could end a lords life. If the lords died by these events then directly killing them wouldn't be as necessary.
WeetchKing
Recruit
RabbleKnight said:A noble wasn't allowed to kill another noble without a good reason.WeetchKing said:Armaury said:Killing a noble or a lord should be possible only if you're really powerfull however it would kill you're reputation and renown with the faction, maybe killing bad karma lord will not
I noticed there is a slot for cloaks
There is probably destructible environnement and i hope there will be fire arrows and you can burn villages !
+1
Why lose renown when killing lords? If anything you would gain more renown, more people would know you and talk about you. Only losing honor or some other system would be fine.
They preferred to capture them.
Its historically accurate.
Feeding an army of 200 soldiers only with butter and honey is not historically accurate, maybe we should remove that from the game so it's more historically accurate.
Articus88888
Recruit
WeetchKing said:RabbleKnight said:A noble wasn't allowed to kill another noble without a good reason.WeetchKing said:Armaury said:Killing a noble or a lord should be possible only if you're really powerfull however it would kill you're reputation and renown with the faction, maybe killing bad karma lord will not
I noticed there is a slot for cloaks
There is probably destructible environnement and i hope there will be fire arrows and you can burn villages !
+1
Why lose renown when killing lords? If anything you would gain more renown, more people would know you and talk about you. Only losing honor or some other system would be fine.
They preferred to capture them.
Its historically accurate.
Feeding an army of 200 soldiers only with butter and honey is not historically accurate, maybe we should remove that from the game so it's more historically accurate.
As if anything was historically accurate in the first place.
I've never heard of Calradia. Is it a historically accurate continent?
WeetchKing
Recruit
Articus88888 said:WeetchKing said:RabbleKnight said:A noble wasn't allowed to kill another noble without a good reason.WeetchKing said:Armaury said:Killing a noble or a lord should be possible only if you're really powerfull however it would kill you're reputation and renown with the faction, maybe killing bad karma lord will not
I noticed there is a slot for cloaks
There is probably destructible environnement and i hope there will be fire arrows and you can burn villages !
+1
Why lose renown when killing lords? If anything you would gain more renown, more people would know you and talk about you. Only losing honor or some other system would be fine.
They preferred to capture them.
Its historically accurate.
Feeding an army of 200 soldiers only with butter and honey is not historically accurate, maybe we should remove that from the game so it's more historically accurate.
As if anything was historically accurate in the first place.
I've never heard of Calradia. Is it a historically accurate continent?
That's my point, "historically accurate" is a dumb argument. Was warband aiming to be historically accurate by taking place in Calradia, a fantasy continent? maybe we should take the game down and remake it in a real continent with historically accurate soldiers and historically accurate places.
While we're at it let's remove the option to talk to kings when you're just a nobody-peasant, kings don't have time for peasantries also I don't remember history books talking about days passing by in mere seconds, let's also change the game so the time is 1-1 to your real life time.
PerfectTemplar
Regular
Will there be a Alpha or Beta for Bannerlord? (Not necessarily early access but I would like to play it even in an unfinished state lol)
PerfectTemplar said:
Game first playable in 2016.
Eptica said:
what are those?
Maybe some of those are honor/reputation? It was pretty annoying to have to go into an extra menu to view those stats.
creuzet
Sergeant at Arms
Wulfburk said:Some cool pic i got from the video by going 0.2 speed.
So, now you can build a castle and garrison troops in villages. Also, one of the villages has some sort of wharf (we might have naval combat like in the DLC or it's just a feature to improve prosperity).
Just seeing the Gamescon Stuff now. I just jizzed everywhere. EVERYWHERE. 
WeetchKing said:Articus88888 said:WeetchKing said:RabbleKnight said:A noble wasn't allowed to kill another noble without a good reason.WeetchKing said:Armaury said:Killing a noble or a lord should be possible only if you're really powerfull however it would kill you're reputation and renown with the faction, maybe killing bad karma lord will not
I noticed there is a slot for cloaks
There is probably destructible environnement and i hope there will be fire arrows and you can burn villages !
+1
Why lose renown when killing lords? If anything you would gain more renown, more people would know you and talk about you. Only losing honor or some other system would be fine.
They preferred to capture them.
Its historically accurate.
Feeding an army of 200 soldiers only with butter and honey is not historically accurate, maybe we should remove that from the game so it's more historically accurate.
As if anything was historically accurate in the first place.
I've never heard of Calradia. Is it a historically accurate continent?
That's my point, "historically accurate" is a dumb argument. Was warband aiming to be historically accurate by taking place in Calradia, a fantasy continent? maybe we should take the game down and remake it in a real continent with historically accurate soldiers and historically accurate places.
While we're at it let's remove the option to talk to kings when you're just a nobody-peasant, kings don't have time for peasantries also I don't remember history books talking about days passing by in mere seconds, let's also change the game so the time is 1-1 to your real life time.
WFaS is historical fiction as is NW.
Warband tries to be realistic. But they aren't going to make it to the absolute tee, no game has, no game will. It simply won't be enjoyable.
Calradia is just made up. But the factions were all inspired by real factions and people.
creuzet said:Wulfburk said:Some cool pic i got from the video by going 0.2 speed.
So, now you can build a castle and garrison troops in villages. Also, one of the villages has some sort of wharf (we might have naval combat like in the DLC or it's just a feature to improve prosperity).
I have also noticed a settlement health modifier. I suppose its health decreases when it's under siege, especially with siege weapons.
I really hope they give "the empire" a proper name. Calling all the soldiers "imperial x" and "imperial y" is so bloody bland and uninteresting. Even changing it to "calradian" would be preferable.
- Status
Similar threads
