Also at the time Bannerlord is based in two handed/ really long swords were rather rare I believe. So if they plan to be more "realistic" only axes and polearms will be very long.
-
If you are reporting a bug, please head over to our Technical Support section for Bannerlord.
Users who are viewing this thread
- Status
Guray13
I am pretty sure they used a longsword blade. Not a great sword one.kraggrim said:I'd be extremely surprised if there wasn't a "no customising" flag for weapons. Or idneed an optional "customisable" flag. We already know that some weapons aren't customisable, maces weren't in the relevant video anyway.
I wonder what determines weapon "culture". Majority of parts used? Location crafted at?
It's surprising that they tried to make the biggest sword possible here (supposedly) and it's only 104cm blade length. Presumably Vlandians can make bigger ones.
Guray13
Maybe a grip that looks like this? ^^kraggrim said:
Guray13
Marriage was is Warband. Most likely to be in this game too with some more features. We have seen a Turkish video saying about these kind of things (that they heard from developers and not certainly will be in the game but might be) but we haven't received any confirmation from the TW team yet.3THO said:So I read something about family and marriage and having children? Is it a part of the game? How does it work, any info? Or is it pure gossip
Mamlaz
Sergeant Knight at Arms
kraggrim said:
Maximum sword.
Both of those are shorter than my arming sword.
Yabloko said:
Perhaps, instead of more weapons, they should at least try and focus a bit on shields.
Considering the period they want to represent, most shields should be center grip, meaning, they should at least try and make shield combat a bit different from Warband, it should not be just walling while holding the mouse button(I mean, it never should have been so, but now they have even more of a reason to try something different).
I agree, I think if there was some measure of directional blocking with center-grip shields (which can then eliminate the pesky but understandable arrow forcefield around shields) it would add a lot to combat.
Mamlaz
Sergeant Knight at Arms
That is blade length alone, you forget that there is also the hilt.
My arming sword is 104.4 cm.
This one from the metmuseum is 102 cm;
http://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/23367
This sidesword is 113 cm;
http://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/35716
My arming sword is 104.4 cm.
This one from the metmuseum is 102 cm;
http://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/23367
This sidesword is 113 cm;
http://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/35716
Skallagrim did a video on this a while ago, but some of it is kinda iffy.
I'd still probably use a strap-on*, but he was totally right about arrows that penetrate the shield being super bad for you.
*insert dirty joke here.
If we're going to start throwing our shields at someone, we might as well twist off our sword pommels and end them rightly
I'd still probably use a strap-on*, but he was totally right about arrows that penetrate the shield being super bad for you.
*insert dirty joke here.
Mamlaz said:
If we're going to start throwing our shields at someone, we might as well twist off our sword pommels and end them rightly
lysgb
Recruit
Hello guys, I don't know if it was mentioned before or not, but can we agree upon something? Please Taleworlds, make a difference in taking damage from different weapons on different armours. A regular sword should make basically very low damage against plate armour but a comparable mace or even an axe should make a bigger effect. etc etc, I think you can see what I'm trying to say.
Vraelomon said:
All shields are for saps. 27/09/2016: dual wielding blog, just you wait!
MrMundy said:
The kashira is a pommel. It's normally at the blunt end if you can't find it.
- Status
Similar threads
