Mount and blade 2

正在查看此主题的用户

状态
不接受进一步回复。
Esthet 说:
:lol: dude, chill out - you didn't say anything offensive in this thread :smile:

Yes I know I haven’t said anything offensive in this thread (nor in any other thread in these forums for that matter), but I just wasnt sure were you at the same page with me here. Also, I don’t think that weighing other peoples moods is you strongest point and I really don’t understand what you are trying to accomplish by trying to do that over the internet (well actually I have my doubts what you are trying to accomplish with that and its nothing too intelligent  :razz:), so therefore I kindly ask you not to even try it.

Esthet 说:
Then you didn't really wanted to understand

Excuse me, I didnt want to understand what? The fact that you are ok with this thing?

Esthet 说:
you wanted to rant about it. Try doing it at their publisher

I would say im more like expressing my disappointment for the lack of any kind of information and I belive its not prohibited to do that in here. You ok with that?
 
Einarinari 说:
Excuse me, I didnt want to understand what?

Einarinari 说:
I really cant understand why they wont just give us the offical announcement
But seeing you either aren't interested in an answer to that question, or you're too stubborn/<insert your reason here> to accept my answers above - I'm done wasting time posting off-topic :smile:
 
Esthet 说:
But seeing you either aren't interested in an answer to that question

Except for your answer wich states that in your opinion we do not need official announcement (or any other information for that matter), I haven’t got any answer to why they aren’t talking about anything no. Also FYI, my point wasn’t exactly to “get answers” since my point was just to express my disappointment about the lack of any information.

Esthet 说:
or you're too stubborn/<insert your reason here> to accept my answers above

I have allready accepted that your opinion is that we do not need any information, however even though I do not agree with your opinion, I don’t see the point for you to keep on repeating that you have given me "answers". Talking about stubborn..

Esthet 说:
I'm done wasting time posting off-topic :smile:

I really don’t see this (lack of M&B2's information) as a off-topic subject, but you may see it as you wish, since I don’t really care how you see it. I just voiced my opinion and there should be no reason whatsoever to get upset about that. But even though I consider my concern about lack of information concerning M&B2 as a legit subject in a M&B2 thread, I however do agree with you about you just waisting (at least somebodys) time by posting "off-topic"  :razz:.
 
One thing that would be amazing, would be the ability to play multiplayer on the game map. Shouldnt be too hard to implement, or?

Other then that im hoping for more customazition, more sim-aspects, like more building choices for castles, more variety in troops, more ways to administrate ur kingdom and towns and so on. I actually dont think they need to do much on the combat system and the fighting, except AI pathing, formations and such.
 
ArghoZ 说:
One thing that would be amazing, would be the ability to play multiplayer on the game map. Shouldnt be too hard to implement, or?

Other then that im hoping for more customazition, more sim-aspects, like more building choices for castles, more variety in troops, more ways to administrate ur kingdom and towns and so on. I actually dont think they need to do much on the combat system and the fighting, except AI pathing, formations and such.

That was in fact what I expected from MaB Warband, and I became very disapointed when I saw it wasn't like that.
 
Revan Shan 说:
That was in fact what I expected from MaB Warband, and I became very disapointed when I saw it wasn't like that.
We all hoped they could pull that off, but disappointed? Right, because there are so many other games that have multiplayer campaigns with AI factions leaders, lords, warbands, caravans, bandits fighting each other, razing villages, organizing sieges, tournaments and fests in real time while having several multiplayer battles that begin and end at different times in different maps. Can you post the links to those games? :grin:
 
I would like to see an increase in multiplayer maps, weapons, game mods. In singleplayer I would like to see more voice overs, more in depth story, choices, goals. And, I would like to see better graphics, mostly environment and terrain improvement. And last but not least, optimization that would cover the increased graphic load on the machines.

If everything fails, we still have Warband which is an awesome game. So no worries!


 
I would like to see people sitting down at feasts. And eating.
It is so weird to walk into a hall which is "feasting" and everyone is just standing, staring at each other.
Not sure if this has been said already.
 
Oh god please Taleworlds , please , if the reason you are not showing much of Mount and Blade 2 is money , please go on kickstarter and offer us to help  you , ill be the first to donate !
If  you need more team members make an offer to aspiring game developers and offer them a internship with minimal wage. I bet my ass people would come to you . Or even better hire some modders .
 
Hmm i hope you can knock down another cavalary while charging at them would be an epic collision.


I bet they made Napoleonic wars as a sort of donation to mount and blade 2 development might release a trailer soon too.
 
This is what I want i M&B2:

- More tactics in battle. This can be achieved through more formation and grouping options, and the ability to place the men into units. Talesworld could take a look at the total war series, even tough we fight from another perspective (which make it a lot harder to command the army and get a view of the battlefield), there is a lot to be learned.

- The ability to fully customize your soldiers or groups of soldiers. I should be able to make some of my units excellent pikemen trough letting them train with pole arms, and arm them with such. Or, if I'm stupid, I can train them in using crossbows, and arm them with 2 hand swords...

- More balanced factions. Swadian Knights beats more or less everything, even tough european knights often got their ass kicked by mongols...

- More city- and nation building options. A look could be taken at the total war series again. But diplomacy should also be more advanced, here you should NOT look at the total war series.

I vision a game where every path is open. I can be a merchant, I can be a bandit, but I can also be a warlord, or a great city-builder, or an advanced diplomat who solves my conflict with the pen rather then the sword. The thing is, I love Mount and Blade, but total war and civilization are also great games, and a lot of the things we can find in those games, would be crucial for a medieval feudal lord.

And ofc I want fancy new graphics and tons of weapon and armor, but that is not the most important thing.

Campaign for multiplayer would be awesome as well, don't really know how to fix that. Perhaps you should just let the battle stay at the strategic map for as long as you are in the battle. I think tales world can work something out.
 
ArghoZ 说:
One thing that would be amazing, would be the ability to play multiplayer on the game map. Shouldnt be too hard to implement, or?

Other then that im hoping for more customazition, more sim-aspects, like more building choices for castles, more variety in troops, more ways to administrate ur kingdom and towns and so on. I actually dont think they need to do much on the combat system and the fighting, except AI pathing, formations and such.

I think they have a mod already for this called Persistent World.
 
Can someone more "TaleWorlds-savvy" hazard a guess about how much approximately is the budget they are working with in developing M&B2 ?  :mrgreen:


1) Same margin as M&B.

2) Considerably more than M&B/M&B:W cicle.

3) AAA. Just saying.


 
CutContent 说:
I hope they use euphoria physics. That would be f**king awesome!  :mrgreen:
Unfortunately, that is a quite unrealistic expectation/demand, w/e, seeing that Euphoria costs a ****ton to license, and then you need another two or three ****tons of money to properly code it, as new staff and hardware would be needed... To summarize all of my previous ranting: It's highly unlikely to happen. True, it would be kickass, but... Think what kind of a beast you would need to run it...  :neutral:
 
You mean like ..
M&B-2 Multiplayer with all stuff in M&B Singleplayer?

Kings  , Lords -- Taxes .. owning castles/villages... ? You would be able to join soemone's army? Will you be able to be bandit (I mean to make a hideout- instead of castle)

Will you be able to start your own kingdom?

Things that minds me..

What happens when someone gets offline?
What happends when someone is defeated?
Economy o_O?
Wife , kids  = Life?
Will you be able to choose life(or work) ... like:
1. Warrior -- 2. Peasant -- 3. Thief
4. Caravan Master -- 5. Bodyguard -- 6. Salesman
((Not important but if there is any way to have job not just having to war to earn money it would be great --))

Will you be able to kidnap someone -- Will there be chat? And which ones?
General = SPAM Chat -.-
Private=  PM or Letters ( quite good if it takes like 5-10 minutes till it arrives depending on location )
Or even chat  like in SP in M&B... (But can write w/e u want in there )


Map must be ALOT bigger if you attend to make it like SP (M&B) .. As I dont think that its smart making it that you got map of world but haz to travel like u'r in battle mode.
Uhmm,.. What else..

How will Lords/Leaders/Commanders treat their real ppl followers? Rank system? Weapon system?

Etc ..etc...etc...

Try answering this one xD -- Actualyl that is how I imagine M&B2 (IF IT HAZ MP!!) So .. Completly RP -- No duels , capture the flag and other DM/TDM ****z. Just my opinion -- or a new Mod can be made like that... w/e
Dont mind.. I was just talking to myself.
 
That would take away much of M&B's uniqueness I'm afraid. This isn't a generic persistent fantasy world MMO we're looking forward to, now is it?
 
状态
不接受进一步回复。
后退
顶部 底部