Lord Burgess1
discuss (so i have an idea what to use in my army)
The Mercenary said:Knights win, hands-down. A force of 100 mounted Knights can rape any other 100 troops in game.
Hietala said:those types kick ass enough in the field, AND they kick ass in sieges knights, on the other hands, are only half effective. They only kick ass in the field, but I would NEVER deploy them in a siege
Lord Burgess1 said:(sergeants not sergeants)
The Mercenary said:Knights win, hands-down. A force of 100 mounted Knights can rape any other 100 troops in game.
Now, that's what I lika about the Vaegirs, their cavalry is mediocre ok (something around mercenary horseman quality) and while dismounted, they do better than dismounted Swadian knights. + Vaegir guards are OK, but I would never replace my huscarls with them.Troll said:Hietala said:those types kick ass enough in the field, AND they kick ass in sieges knights, on the other hands, are only half effective. They only kick ass in the field, but I would NEVER deploy them in a siege
Actually, I have noticed that in sieges Vaegir Knights can be as effective as Huscarls in sieges if used right way. Their bardiches do nice job on top of the siege ladder on both sides. Just don't get them charge before shooting enemy archers.
Lord Burgess1 said:you do realise lancers carry bows as wellMiclee said:KHERGIT HORSE ARCHERS FTW!!
Hmm? what you really think a dismounted knight is slow? the speed of moving side ways is the same no matter how heavy your armour is. so we can still dodge arrows if they aren't caught by our shield. and the morningstars may proof usefull when up close?Lord Burgess1 said:if they implement sieges into warband then all the knights (like KB) are going to lose unless they learn to be flexible