Meat fleet or half-peen?

[Do not look here]

They renamed it obviously. But it wasn't originally a Christian holiday.

Of course, it was about other Christ, born in some Gaul village

隐藏

 

[Toffey]

Oh, I had no idea that circumcision is not that common.
*feels weird now*

 

[FrisianDude]

They renamed it obviously.

And changed it enough so it became a wholly new celebration, so it is pretty Christian, except it's roots are indeed not. But still, saying Christmas isn't Christian is a bit like saying Rome isn't Christian, because originally it wasn't.

 

[Guan_Chung]

I see what you're saying now, from what you typed before it seemed as if you were saying that the Christians came up with the entire holiday on their own.

 

[Pharaoh Llandy]

Saturnalia FTW!

 

[Do not look here]

I see what you're saying now, from what you typed before it seemed as if you were saying that the Christians came up with the entire holiday on their own.

Hardly to say which of the holidays were made entirely by Christians.

That was easier to say pagans that they should only change -put-god-name-here- to God.

 

[Dudro]

Why would anyone want to ban me? I haven't done anything against the rules.

I thought racism was against the rules...

Don't matter whether or not it was originally Christian, it's Christian now, 'cept for the 0.1 percent of the population of Earth that are still Pagans.  or neo-Pagans or whatever.

 

[FrisianDude]

I see what you're saying now, from what you typed before it seemed as if you were saying that the Christians came up with the entire holiday on their own.

Ah, yes. I wasn't clear with what I meant at first.

 

[Elenmmare]

隐藏

I find it weird how obsessed people who haven't been circumcised get about circumcision. One would almost imagine that they either harbor some sort of deep-seated inferiority complex about it, or they are gripped by some kind of paranoid fear that someone will take their foreskin away from them at some point in the future. Other than that, I'll have to /sign to pretty much everything butscrew said. It looks better, in my opinion, and I've never heard about any women who claimed otherwise. Done properly, it is very safe, and as far as body modification goes it is extremely minor. Quite frankly putting holes in your ears to hang things from them sounds a lot more dubious than removing an extraneous flap of skin from the body.

I've never met anyone who was displeased about the fact that they were circumcised, either. That seems to occur only in Europe, and among some radical atheists elsewhere. Objections to the procedure seem to have more to do with opposition to religion than practical considerations (which have always seemed like more of a smokescreen for an atheist agenda when used, since science can't really back up strong claims for or against it).

Your post has proved that snippies get just as uppity.

Oh, so standing up for the target of a witch hunt is being uppity? Please.

Except there's no witchhunt, just a bunch of dudes getting together and talking about their dicks.

 

[Dudro]

Yeah, just a bunch o' normal guys talking about the looks and shapes and misfortunes of our penises.  But there weren't actually any misfortunes right?


I wonder how closely moderators are following this?

 

[Seff]

Well, LL posted here, so they know of it for sure.

 

[El Perro Finlandese]

Foreskin removed for medical issues, which I shall not explain.

 

[Dudro]

c'moooooon.


Don't actually though.

 

[Vraid]

Foreskin galore for me!
(That didn't quite come out right.)

 

[Seff]

I think it sounds quite plausible, seeing as it's coming from you.

 

[Captain Kris]

Penis intact!