svart
Regular

After i played a few characters, i have found that marnid/borcha best contribute me by boosting their non-combat skills, and leaving their combat skills at null.
I find it quite hard to believe a person who fought hundreds of battles, has the fighting level of a peasant - hell even a peasant is more dangerous ...
With the new intelligence handicap, the armor skill, and the harder to level system, it seems like a great waste to put points in non-combat skills for the player, and vice versa put combat skill points for marnid/borcha.
Don't get me wrong, i'm an avid hardcore gamer, and i give my blessing for the added slowness in progression with the new version.
But it seems a bit insane to me to try to have the two "heroes" at the same combat level than me and at a higher level than the other troops without having a -4 tactics disadvantage to each fight, scouting that equals a 12 year old boy scouts, tracking our own footprints and going in circles, and well you get the point
So is it just me ?
I find it quite hard to believe a person who fought hundreds of battles, has the fighting level of a peasant - hell even a peasant is more dangerous ...
With the new intelligence handicap, the armor skill, and the harder to level system, it seems like a great waste to put points in non-combat skills for the player, and vice versa put combat skill points for marnid/borcha.
Don't get me wrong, i'm an avid hardcore gamer, and i give my blessing for the added slowness in progression with the new version.
But it seems a bit insane to me to try to have the two "heroes" at the same combat level than me and at a higher level than the other troops without having a -4 tactics disadvantage to each fight, scouting that equals a 12 year old boy scouts, tracking our own footprints and going in circles, and well you get the point
So is it just me ?





