Will you still buy Bl after:
>lying to your customers about a beta in 2016, 3 years later, a beta is announced When did they lie? they only mentioned some shape or form, which we did get through the multiplayer booth.
>making fun of your fans indirectly through dev blogs with jokes no one finds funny except the development team? They do? news to me. We can take jokes on the chin, plus fans say far worse than vice versa
>not implementing highly requested fan favorite features (CO-OP, Nord Invasion will not come at launch) CO-OP campaign has many issues associated with the idea. Nobody complains about the Witcher 3 not having a CO-OP.
>refusing to start any sort of Kickstarter, Patreon or something to let us release BL faster You rest on the assumption that more money would speed up the development. TWs sold 6 million copies of M&B in 2015 (more since then I'm sure). I doubt they have financial issues.
>Not specifying anything about internal problems to explain the development time. Again an assumption. TWs may be taking their time to perfect it, rather than delaying it because of issues etc.
>Censoring whistleblowers on Reddit and Steam forums If I were developing a game, I would hate whistleblowers leaking details about the game that may not even be a feature anymore etc. Same goes for a director/producer being pissed at someone leaking storylines.
Personally, I will still be buying BL, but I will be leaving a bad review on steam no matter how good the game is, because this is simply outrageous. That's petty. Why not review the game for what it is on release? Steam reviews are to review the game not the development etc.