L'Aigle>Napoleonic Wars?

[SillySausage]

I am sincerely sorry for not pleasing your apocalyptic desires of crushing the purpose of this thread, but... that.. it really touched me... *fake cries*

Not really, not at all! Not a single F*ck is what I give to these comments!

NW community is all about hate and kids pretending to be ultra gods of the internet since they left these forums.

And btw let me correct you there:

"You are the pillar of this horrible community.

I mean by that, we are all sane individuals at heart, and if we were not, more-or-less unjust governments would have locked some of us away
YEARS ago. (except for North Korea, where the Internet is prohibited, the Vatican, where the internet is sin, Salt Lake City, where the Internet is devils work, and some other places where some of these people are considered heroes... OH MY GOD the world is terrible... but let me hold on to the topic, I am thinking out loud... ehm... written.) The point is: This is a thread debating IF Napoleonic Wars and L'Aigle, some rather amazingly developed and awesome games upheld by a ferocious community, could be compared, and If so, which of the two would be better/greater/more fun.

And if you are not Megaberna, Do NOT continue reading if you are easily offended.

隐藏

What you are doing is retarding around in the forums, and trolling threads of SERIOUS discussions with inappropiate and out-of-content remarks. So please! Donkey cap, corner, chair, and sit there until the flesh falls of your bones!

Now: Presto, Admins! Ladies and Gentlemen, get this thread to become a serious discussion again!

Thank you.

 

[Megaberna]

隐藏

I am sincerely sorry for not pleasing your apocalyptic desires of crushing the purpose of this thread, but... that.. it really touched me... *fake cries*

Not really, not at all! Not a single F*ck is what I give to these comments!

NW community is all about hate and kids pretending to be ultra gods of the internet since they left these forums.

And btw let me correct you there:

"You are the pillar of this horrible community.

I mean by that, we are all sane individuals at heart, and if we were not, more-or-less unjust governments would have locked some of us away
YEARS ago. (except for North Korea, where the Internet is prohibited, the Vatican, where the internet is sin, Salt Lake City, where the Internet is devils work, and some other places where some of these people are considered heroes... OH MY GOD the world is terrible... but let me hold on to the topic, I am thinking out loud... ehm... written.) The point is: This is a thread debating IF Napoleonic Wars and L'Aigle, some rather amazingly developed and awesome games upheld by a ferocious community, could be compared, and If so, which of the two would be better/greater/more fun.

And if you are not Megaberna, Do NOT continue reading if you are easily offended.

隐藏

What you are doing is retarding around in the forums, and trolling threads of SERIOUS discussions with inappropiate and out-of-content remarks. So please! Donkey cap, corner, chair, and sit there until the flesh falls of your bones!

NW user at it's best

Thank you for proving my point.

 

[dan1993uk]

I do not have crippled sarcasm. I am one of the most sarcastic people of my country (because all germans laugh in their bunkers basements). I just prove with my post that you can't compare a SinglePlayer MOD with a MultiPlayer DLC.

I stopped reading after this part.

 

[SillySausage]

Nothing more would I expect from you, good sir!

But atleast you got the point.

 

[dan1993uk]

The problem is that it seems you did not get my point, L'Aigle is a SP and MP mod, just because one comes before the other does not mean the latter does not exist.

I also want you to know I took your avatar and edited it a bit, for my needs.

 

[N3XuS]

lel

 

[SillySausage]

I see... It gave me a stroke of laughter... for a bit. you CR*PWURST!

Well then... I assume you don't need my presence in this Flamewar any longer... But remember... I will be watching you with great interest.

 

[dan1993uk]

There is no flame war here(not from me atleast), I have merely gave my opinion about L'Aigle and pointed out mine and everyones right to do so.

 

[Megaberna]

I'm loving these avatars...looks like we are having a "sausagefest"!

(If you know what i mean...)

 

[Evelyn]

Hypocrite.

 

[Hadhod]

To get this back on topic:
I doubt that the melee system of L'Aigle can compete with NW's melee. Furthermore I fear, same as Goki, that the lag in MP will increase, because better graphics mean more data transport and thus the servers would need more performance, which is simply not to achieve as Mount and Blade was scripted for one core (atleast as far as I know, but I might be wrongly informed).
I have to admit the graphics look damn fine (except the way the character holds the musket, the hand looks kinda derpy) and the great variety of factions and troops will be a big plus. I will definately consider playing it in SP to check that out. And I mean it's for free, so why not.
Regarding the MP: I will see if the melee fits my playstyle and if I like it I might come and play the MP now and then. Let's see how it turns out to be.

 

[biggun34]

To get this back on topic:
I doubt that the melee system of L'Aigle can compete with NW's melee.

That is down to personal prefernce as there is not really a lot to the melee in NW, even after all the various patches you find a spam of up-stab and buggy blocks. 

 

[MaHuD]

There will always be spam though, and part of the reason there is a lot of spam is the lack of a shield for use in group wombat.

 

[nicknick12]

I want it so badly

 

[Willhelm]

L'Aigles images are always taken in maximum graphics. I'm sure it will be fine in low graphics, and i'd like to see an image of it.

隐藏

Also the last few pages of childish arguing is really pathetic.

 

[Patchouli Knowledge]

Furthermore I fear, same as Goki, that the lag in MP will increase, because better graphics mean more data transport and thus the servers would need more performance, which is simply not to achieve as Mount and Blade was scripted for one core (atleast as far as I know, but I might be wrongly informed).

That is factually inaccurate. Most graphical information is not relayed to and from the server and has no effect on lag. Even if it did, L'Aigle use fewer triangles and fewer textures than NW, so it couldn't possibly be worse. The new shaders have virtually no effect on performance, too.

 

[MaHuD]

He probably confused number of models used in a moving object (like a cannon, wagon or boat) with graphical quality in general.

 

[Hadhod]

Furthermore I fear, same as Goki, that the lag in MP will increase, because better graphics mean more data transport and thus the servers would need more performance, which is simply not to achieve as Mount and Blade was scripted for one core (atleast as far as I know, but I might be wrongly informed).

That is factually inaccurate. Most graphical information is not relayed to and from the server and has no effect on lag. Even if it did, L'Aigle use fewer triangles and fewer textures than NW, so it couldn't possibly be worse. The new shaders have virtually no effect on performance, too.

Alright thanks for pointing that out. I am not a texting/scripting-pro so like MahuD said I might just have confused it. 

 

[Skyddis]

Furthermore I fear, same as Goki, that the lag in MP will increase, because better graphics mean more data transport and thus the servers would need more performance, which is simply not to achieve as Mount and Blade was scripted for one core (atleast as far as I know, but I might be wrongly informed).

That is factually inaccurate. Most graphical information is not relayed to and from the server and has no effect on lag. Even if it did, L'Aigle use fewer triangles and fewer textures than NW, so it couldn't possibly be worse. The new shaders have virtually no effect on performance, too.

Alright thanks for pointing that out. I am not a texting/scripting-pro so like MahuD said I might just have confused it. 

how silly of you

 

[Hadhod]

隐藏

Furthermore I fear, same as Goki, that the lag in MP will increase, because better graphics mean more data transport and thus the servers would need more performance, which is simply not to achieve as Mount and Blade was scripted for one core (atleast as far as I know, but I might be wrongly informed).

That is factually inaccurate. Most graphical information is not relayed to and from the server and has no effect on lag. Even if it did, L'Aigle use fewer triangles and fewer textures than NW, so it couldn't possibly be worse. The new shaders have virtually no effect on performance, too.

Alright thanks for pointing that out. I am not a texting/scripting-pro so like MahuD said I might just have confused it. 

how silly of you

I totally agree.