LAWolves
Regular

It's a common opinion that Khergits are unbalanced, especially on open maps, where they have plenty of room to manoeuvre.
In addition they have the fearsome (or gay) Horse Archers which are incredibly effective at (laming) harassing enemy forces without ever having to enter combat.
Their Lancers have a very well balanced loadout to choose from:
good swords, axes, lances, hafted blades and great high-end armors, warhorses and coursers.
They can fight effectively any other faction being extremely deadly on horse and being able to hold their own even on foot.
Against the Swadians they can use their horse archers to kill Swadian's horses and knights, which are Swadia's pride, make short work of Crossbowmen with hafted blades and render the 2 handed swords useless with bows.
Against the Vaegirs they can employ Armored cavalry to cut down Vaegir Archers and Mounted Archers to prevent and exploit of the Bardiche, thus leaving the Vaegirs with few options having only par to inferior cavalry.
Against the Nords they could crush the opposing Scouts and have the freedom to play with slower preys circling around with Cavalry, even the most skilled Huskarl would rather stay at home than having to deal with Horse Archers.
Against the Rhodocks they would make short work of any 2-Hander as even the "Horsebane" Pike is useless against arrows and the Rhodock cavalry would hardly stand a chance to Lancers, the Crossbowmen having no one able to defend them from Cavalry charges would fall soon.
Against the Sarranids they could employ a more versatile rooster of archers, coupled by some Heavy Cavalry and defeat the Sarranid Mamelukes during the first minutes, fighting their Infantry at about the same level and their archers being slightly superior not even the Sultanate would usually be able to stop the Khergits on an open map.
Even if they are superior in the open field, and quite capable on foot too they can't be considered unbalanced as the aspect that makes them so strong can be countered by any other faction. Even the Romans lost against the Horse Archers but they eventually came to a solution: fight fire with......more fire
Interesting part here Interesting part here Interesting part here Interesting part here
The superiority (gayness) of the Khergits stands in their Archers who can provide effective cover of several other lacks they have but even Horse Archers have weak point, they are not as effective as a usual Archer for what concerns "Number of aimed shots per minute" and this means that employing an appropriate number of Archers to systematically eliminate horses while Infantry provide protection from charges and Cavalry keeps harassing the Archers so that they cannot start circling the Footmen.
This tactic can be simplified saying that Kergits are weak to Archers and Ranged in general.
Hope this WallOfText was of some help to someone,
LAWolves
In addition they have the fearsome (or gay) Horse Archers which are incredibly effective at (laming) harassing enemy forces without ever having to enter combat.
Their Lancers have a very well balanced loadout to choose from:
good swords, axes, lances, hafted blades and great high-end armors, warhorses and coursers.
They can fight effectively any other faction being extremely deadly on horse and being able to hold their own even on foot.
Against the Swadians they can use their horse archers to kill Swadian's horses and knights, which are Swadia's pride, make short work of Crossbowmen with hafted blades and render the 2 handed swords useless with bows.
Against the Vaegirs they can employ Armored cavalry to cut down Vaegir Archers and Mounted Archers to prevent and exploit of the Bardiche, thus leaving the Vaegirs with few options having only par to inferior cavalry.
Against the Nords they could crush the opposing Scouts and have the freedom to play with slower preys circling around with Cavalry, even the most skilled Huskarl would rather stay at home than having to deal with Horse Archers.
Against the Rhodocks they would make short work of any 2-Hander as even the "Horsebane" Pike is useless against arrows and the Rhodock cavalry would hardly stand a chance to Lancers, the Crossbowmen having no one able to defend them from Cavalry charges would fall soon.
Against the Sarranids they could employ a more versatile rooster of archers, coupled by some Heavy Cavalry and defeat the Sarranid Mamelukes during the first minutes, fighting their Infantry at about the same level and their archers being slightly superior not even the Sultanate would usually be able to stop the Khergits on an open map.
Even if they are superior in the open field, and quite capable on foot too they can't be considered unbalanced as the aspect that makes them so strong can be countered by any other faction. Even the Romans lost against the Horse Archers but they eventually came to a solution: fight fire with......more fire
Interesting part here Interesting part here Interesting part here Interesting part here
The superiority (gayness) of the Khergits stands in their Archers who can provide effective cover of several other lacks they have but even Horse Archers have weak point, they are not as effective as a usual Archer for what concerns "Number of aimed shots per minute" and this means that employing an appropriate number of Archers to systematically eliminate horses while Infantry provide protection from charges and Cavalry keeps harassing the Archers so that they cannot start circling the Footmen.
This tactic can be simplified saying that Kergits are weak to Archers and Ranged in general.
Hope this WallOfText was of some help to someone,
LAWolves







