Just a small non-issue but...

[TempestWolf]

... when a unit upgrade requires a "Horse", please make it prioritise the cheapest "Horse" in my inventory, and not the ultra cool super horse I just got from the tournament and am waiting to reach 60 riding for )... thank you!!!

 

[Deadh34d]

Those upgrades requiring horses are rough.

If I don't have to provide equipment for all my other troop upgrades, I shouldn't have to provide a horse for cavalry. The way I look at it, the cost of upgrading them goes towards them buying the equipment they need; why can't they just use that money to buy a horse too? Cav do feel really strong this time around though, so maybe this system is in place so you don't just field an army of cavalry and steamroll everything.

 

[Demoulius]

Ive found normal horses as cheap as 83-84. Those were a real find Were steppe horses IIRC and one of the villages sold them. But allowing us to choose which horses would get picked would be even better.

 

[Brynjahr]

Well it is war horses used to upgrade so probably took the first war horse there

 

[Vashonn]

There is the "lock" system in the inventory; do we know that this could be used to prevent a certain horse from being claimed by a troop?

 

[Brynjahr]

There is the "lock" system in the inventory; do we know that this could be used to prevent a certain horse from being claimed by a troop?

test and see \o/

 

[TempestWolf]

It requires a "Horse", not a "War Horse"... the tournament reward is a "Horse"... I also locked it... I bought the cheapest other "Horse" I could find... no matter what I do, the upgrade uses up my most expensive horse.