Tiberius Decimus Maximus 说:
Sounds like as much of an argument for assisted suicide as a anti-war film.
That doesn't seem to be Trumbo's intent really, and again, the movie did cut out a lot so I can see where people got that impression. The strongest anti-war sentiments in the book are not in the movie, maybe because it'd be difficult to work them in cinematically. For example, in the most prominent discussion, Joe suggests that dying for a cause like freedom or democracy is worthless and a lie. He suggests war in general is folly and that politicians/leaders/generals dishonor the dead by foolishly speaking on their behalf. The passage is quite brilliant, but again, nowhere in the movie.
Also, (possible spoilers): what happens to Joe? Exactly.
Not to mention, since his request to be killed was denied, what did he want? He wanted to be a tourist attraction, displayed all over the country. Ron Kovic pointed out that he wanted to take his terrible condition and turn it into something beautiful.
krik 说:
Yeah it would be complete hell I'd probably go insane in less than a week of conscious thought.
Well, here's the scary part: it was inspired by true events. Two soldiers apparently had case studies performed. The first only lived a couple of weeks, the other poor bastard, off of whom Trumbo took the most inspiration, lived something like
14 years. I wish I could quote the article extract - I'll have to page through things again.
Again though, Trumbo probably wasn't suggesting killing Joe was the solution. He is suggesting Joe shouldn't have been there in the first place. The novel is far more outspoken in that respect.
Also again, seriously, pick up the book.