Only if you were tamed too, few months before birth preferably.
Istanbul? - Konstantinopolis? - Byzantium?
- Thread starter ancalimon
- Start date
Users who are viewing this thread
FrisianDude
Archduke
Pan-Turkists say the darndest things.
The Shadow
Recruit
othr said:
I'm thinking of starting a site with quotes from the Internet from deranged people. Your material is just brilliant and a great start.
I would read this site all the time if you did it.
Wait, I guess this means police means frozen ground water.....
Ah, yes. The turkic ancestors spread through the land and civilized the savage peoples of Europe and Asia. But, what about the Americas? Was their defeat at the hands of the Europeans caused by the inability of the turks to reach them?ancalimon said:
The Cow Dude said:
You are forgetting Quetzalcoatl, who was obviously a Turk who managed to reach the shores of America and was revered as a god because of his knowledge about EVERYTHING, everyone knows that "Quetzalcoatl" means *random babbling about languages*.
However, when he left (he left to the Kingdom of Agartha in the core of the earth as he had some business to do there) all of the american civilizations fell into decay and that's why they were powerless against the Europeans.
Take the tsal out and you get a Turkic spelling of Cthulhu, therefore we can conclude that Cthulhu is the true origin of the religious trinity.ancalimon said:
Tiberius Decimus Maximus said:ancalimon said:
Or penis, amusingly enough.
Which would explain the "snake" portion...
Check this out:
http://www.viewzone.com/snake.html
http://www.viewzone.com/gene.india.html
Here are the holy layers depicted as circles within each other.
The penis part I talked about earlier: http://karabakh-doc.azerall.info/ru/turkologiya/trk010eng.htm
Oh, I see. So Quetzalcoalt used flight to go to the Americas and tame the savage aboriginals. Yes, I understand now, but why did the civilizations of America collapse with the coming of the Europeans? Were the turkic leaders who tamed them better trained or did they know more recent technology?ancalimon said:
The American aboriginals were not worthy of being turks? I'm positively amazed by this newfound data!
Why would they migrate so far away from their turkish brothers? To form their own sects of Tengrism and spread heretical and misinform people of their true origin. As far as I'm concerned they are not worthy.ancalimon said:
The Cow Dude said:
First of all, there is no Turkish back then. It's like saying that England, France, Spain, Holland etc were created by Americans. I'm saying the opposite: "America was created by Europeans" & "Europe was created by Turks". The word "Turk" was created later. They simply were not called Turks. I define them as "Turks" because it makes things easy to understand for you. It's the language, and the deep culture within itself that gave fruit to civilization.
Also, I can not talk about why they went to America. They must have had a pretty good reason.
Ah, yes. They were in fact turks, but they didn't want to call themselves that, because of the terrible memories of turkish taming rituals.ancalimon said:
You should write a book.
Urlik
Sergeant Knight
ancalimon said:
make up your mind
"they were Turks but they weren't called Turks but they were Turks but there weren't any Turks but everyone was a Turk and the Turks conquered and tamed the ones who weren't."
if this is you defining things so that we can understand, drop the patronising attitude and give us the straight talk.
if they weren't called Turks, tell us what they were called and we might take you seriously.
are you keeping it from us because we have heard about Sumerians and Babylonians, etc and know that they weren't Turks and that all this is complete bull****?
