Is bannerlord losing their idendity?

Is bannerlord losing their idendity?

  • Yes

    选票: 19 14.0%
  • No

    选票: 117 86.0%

  • 全部投票
    136

正在查看此主题的用户

sankokuworld

Recruit
Do you think taleworlds are forgetting what made them great or are they improving from the old games? Yes or no?
 
From the stuff they showed in the singleplayer it seems to me they build up what made MnB great in the first place. But as Warband also created a new multiplayer community, which needs its own special care with the community and network stuff, it needs beta tests and testers. So now it maybe seems like they only focus on MP but in fact if you followed Bannerlord since 2012 or 2013 you would know they mostly talked about SP and only in last year they really started to finishing up the multiplayer and thats why we got those betas.


I mean you didnt really say why you think Bannerlord might losing its idendity. I dont see an issue in bannerlord yet. We will see in March tho.
 
Bannerlord is not even released yet, how can it lose its identity? Do you mean "Is Bannerlord not the same as Warband"?
 
Sgt._Pepper 说:
Bannerlord is not even released yet, how can it lose its identity? Do you mean "Is Bannerlord not the same as Warband"?
it lost something it never had.

But yes, singleplayer looks good as ever but multiplayer is far off
 
Χρήσιμος Ηλίθιος 说:
Bannerlord is a self-managed Anarchosyndicalist peasant commune.

There's some lovely filth down here Dennis.

Also, no. It's still very much M&B.
 
Dest45 说:
Sgt._Pepper 说:
Bannerlord is not even released yet, how can it lose its identity? Do you mean "Is Bannerlord not the same as Warband"?
it lost something it never had.

But yes, singleplayer looks good as ever but multiplayer is far off

pretty much
 
Younes 说:
Dest45 说:
Sgt._Pepper 说:
Bannerlord is not even released yet, how can it lose its identity? Do you mean "Is Bannerlord not the same as Warband"?
it lost something it never had.

But yes, singleplayer looks good as ever but multiplayer is far off

pretty much

Yep. No real problem with SP, issues are with MP.
 
Taleworlds right now
NSkVG.jpg
 
I'm not sure that such a question could adequately be ascertained at this moment in time. I mean... The game has yet to be released. How could that really, truly be answered?

Though, there are some things that may be concerning to some...

The combat in multiplayer has, at least in the beginning of the closed beta, caused participants (especially several M&B veterans) to complain. The UI design has been criticized for looking like one of those micro-transaction based online mini-games... And don't get me started on the current Bannerlord banner situation.

There are some things that some fans take issue with, but to ask if Bannerlord (or perhaps you meant TaleWorlds) has lost its identity... I don't think that's a fair question to ask right now, nor do I think that can truly be answered.

I will say that I am very disappointed with some of their design choices.
 
Χρήσιμος Ηλίθιος 说:
Bannerlord is a self-managed Anarchosyndicalist peasant commune.

just watched the full movie for the first time yesterday. Love it.
 
Benjamin Bones 说:
I'm not sure that such a question could adequately be ascertained at this moment in time. I mean... The game has yet to be released. How could that really, truly be answered?

The combat in multiplayer has, at least in the beginning of the closed beta, caused participants (especially several M&B veterans) to complain. The UI design has been criticized for looking like one of those micro-transaction based online mini-games... And don't get me started on the current Bannerlord banner situation.

Even though it is not released, and though many things will be subject to change, I don't see an issue in talking about last known facts of gameplay.

With that, I'm going to hit off saying they aren't, as let's be honest, most issues(yes issues) will be fixed or adjusted by mods as was with Native Warband.

That being said, there are a number of design features that don't stick well with me, one being the character portraits. They look really really bad imo.

My personal worry for bannerlord however, which is still prevalent is its encyclopedia. This is going to be a massive game, however, having the ability to google search information on basically anything is ridiculous, especially considering the setting. Want to know where a lord is? Just search the encyclopedia. Want to know how many troops in the garrison of any castle(friend or for)? Encyclopedia. WANT TO KNOW THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF FIELDED TROOPS OF YOUR RIVAL FACTION?? Dw encyclopedias got you covered. Yes, it is a streamlined system, but it builds on top of the issue I'm sure many veterans have faced in SP, and that's the power of winning most engagements because they are(for the most part) the initiator which in turn, is what makes late-game Warband awfully bland.

TL; DR: If the encyclopedia stays the way it was shown back in Gamescom and September vid, it will have lost its identity of being a challenging game strategically and logistically.

Especially early game, it won't feel like you are an adventurer in this world, rather a literal scholar using that given info to raise yourself.
 
Don't really understand the question here. The game has a strong identity and it definitely feels like a Mount & Blade game, there's nothing similar on the market at the moment.
 
JustinTime49 说:
Benjamin Bones 说:
I'm not sure that such a question could adequately be ascertained at this moment in time. I mean... The game has yet to be released. How could that really, truly be answered?

The combat in multiplayer has, at least in the beginning of the closed beta, caused participants (especially several M&B veterans) to complain. The UI design has been criticized for looking like one of those micro-transaction based online mini-games... And don't get me started on the current Bannerlord banner situation.

Even though it is not released, and though many things will be subject to change, I don't see an issue in talking about last known facts of gameplay.

With that, I'm going to hit off saying they aren't, as let's be honest, most issues(yes issues) will be fixed or adjusted by mods as was with Native Warband.

That being said, there are a number of design features that don't stick well with me, one being the character portraits. They look really really bad imo.

My personal worry for bannerlord however, which is still prevalent is its encyclopedia. This is going to be a massive game, however, having the ability to google search information on basically anything is ridiculous, especially considering the setting. Want to know where a lord is? Just search the encyclopedia. Want to know how many troops in the garrison of any castle(friend or for)? Encyclopedia. WANT TO KNOW THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF FIELDED TROOPS OF YOUR RIVAL FACTION?? Dw encyclopedias got you covered. Yes, it is a streamlined system, but it builds on top of the issue I'm sure many veterans have faced in SP, and that's the power of winning most engagements because they are(for the most part) the initiator which in turn, is what makes late-game Warband awfully bland.

TL; DR: If the encyclopedia stays the way it was shown back in Gamescom and September vid, it will have lost its identity of being a challenging game strategically and logistically.

Especially early game, it won't feel like you are an adventurer in this world, rather a literal scholar using that given info to raise yourself.

Most players just google search their problems or questions so I think this is a good think, doesn;t force me to open my phone and waste time googling about stuff.
 
Sgt._Pepper 说:
Bannerlord is not even released yet, how can it lose its identity? Do you mean "Is Bannerlord not the same as Warband"?

man the different between a games forums and steams forum is night and day. on here, there is logical conversation about the topic at hand. on steam its a post about how this certain nobody won't give their money to the company anymore or telling everyone that they, specifically, will not be picking this game up

kudos to you gents.
 
后退
顶部 底部