Haha, instead of writing my philosophy essay I am reading facts about medieval warfare xD
But from me... Ancients had a huge impact on the medieval ages on warfare. Take
spisa eastern cavalry spear/lance with a leaf-like tip. It was a shorten version of Macedonian
sarrisa, for example. Also, Greek sword
machira gave birth to Turkish signature sword:
jatagan.
Speaking about the armour. Medieval ages as such are rather an era of a chainmail(see Byzantin
Cathafracti, just covered with mail, together with horses) than full plates, especially in the east. There also appeared a lammelar harness, but latter, with the appearance of Mongols under Chingis Chan. But it was rare an expensive(lammelar plates are found in the graves of Kiev
kinaz, dukes, rather than common soldiers.)
And armour could not weight that much, same with swords(even those two handed) Simple reason: nobody would use them
. If tripping and falling in battle means that you are dead, who would risk it (no aromour could withstand a thrust from an alwpike, especially if you are nailed to the ground
). There existed armours that heavy, true, BUT... they were only for tournaments, not for fighting.
To the bows: they were effective as an anti-infrantry weapon, since infrantry was very poorly equipped in terms of armour (Byzantine troopers from the period of the rule of Nikeporos II Phokas had only a padded jacked). Their defense was all their shields. But shields aint perfect, and a good arrow from post-Hun bow could penetrate it. But crossbows, funny, they packed a punch. As much as they were considered unholy and forbidden by the Papacy at one point