Doofus
Sergeant

I'm with the Vlandians. We aren't at war with anyone. Most recent war had been against Sturgians, but that ended a few days back.
Soooo...the rest of the lords vote unanimously to go to war against the Aserai. Ummmm....we have nothing bordering the Aserai.
We war them a while trading for Garantor, but I refuse to involve myself in that stupidity and I feel the only reason it was declared was so I would move my troops to that area so someone else could declare on us and try to take my holdings.. My holdings are Northwestern, mostly Sturgian area.
After a while we decide to declare another war....this one is on the Southern Empire. Again, we have nothing even bordering them. The closest is Epicrotia's nearness to Saneopa.
Now understand, we border the Western Empire, Northern Empire, Battanians, and Sturgians. By what logic would we decide not to declare war on them, but declare 2 separate wars, at the same time, against empires we don't even border? As far as I can tell, its just the game trying to draw my troops away from my holdings so the empires we do border can declare on us and quickly besiege multiple holdings of mine. I refuse to participate.
Understand that if the Western Empire to the south of us declared war on us, or if we declared on them, I would go help out, because at least we border them, even though its not close to my personal holdings, but I won't do so when its us declaring against empires we don't even border.
Mostly this is a rant/complaint, but the logic for these wars is so bad I feel it does qualify as a glitch. I mean at least if it was them declaring against us I could justify it a little that they think we are getting too big and want to try to control us, especially if we were warring others. But there is no justification in this case.
Soooo...the rest of the lords vote unanimously to go to war against the Aserai. Ummmm....we have nothing bordering the Aserai.
We war them a while trading for Garantor, but I refuse to involve myself in that stupidity and I feel the only reason it was declared was so I would move my troops to that area so someone else could declare on us and try to take my holdings.. My holdings are Northwestern, mostly Sturgian area.
After a while we decide to declare another war....this one is on the Southern Empire. Again, we have nothing even bordering them. The closest is Epicrotia's nearness to Saneopa.
Now understand, we border the Western Empire, Northern Empire, Battanians, and Sturgians. By what logic would we decide not to declare war on them, but declare 2 separate wars, at the same time, against empires we don't even border? As far as I can tell, its just the game trying to draw my troops away from my holdings so the empires we do border can declare on us and quickly besiege multiple holdings of mine. I refuse to participate.
Understand that if the Western Empire to the south of us declared war on us, or if we declared on them, I would go help out, because at least we border them, even though its not close to my personal holdings, but I won't do so when its us declaring against empires we don't even border.
Mostly this is a rant/complaint, but the logic for these wars is so bad I feel it does qualify as a glitch. I mean at least if it was them declaring against us I could justify it a little that they think we are getting too big and want to try to control us, especially if we were warring others. But there is no justification in this case.