Their reactions are pretty justified imho. The quality of Viking Conquest right now is pretty horrible even if it was just a free mod. I'm sure they don't doubt the devs will do their best to fix the issues people are just trying to stress how frustrating the current state of the game is and there's honestly nothing wrong with that.KidKoala said:The reactions of a lot people in this sub-forum have been really disappointing, it's sad when people post some of the bile i've seen on here the past few hours.. Play the game, report the bugs or don't play the game. Getting mad and spreading keyboard diarrhea everywhere makes me question the state of the community more than this DLC.
Non-sequitur. A string of mistakes can be simply a string a mistakes. Likewise, do remember that M&B had early access and Warband had a closed beta followed by a free beta. The games for which Taleworlds had sole control were very play-test oriented. Likewise, since Bannerlord is essentially a new engine, some sort of large-scale beta testing should be expected.What does matter is that it implies TaleWorlds now valves money over player experience.
PrideofNi said:JuJu70 said:After all, we just spent £8 on the game.
Oh, the entitlement generation . I bet it's a price of a movie ticket these days, or maybe a pint of beer in a pub?.
How is entitlement == to something you buy? That makes no sense. A movie ticket where I live can be £3, and if it was in the state that this game is in, it wouldn't have even made it into the cinema. I hope if it was Taleworlds that forced this game to go live, that they has a serious rethink of their policy. It would be truly disappointing if Bannerlord comes out in a state like this.
Also I'm not 12, so take your pathetic attempt to generalise and insult people elsewhere.
Yeah, troops and and weapons are a bit blandDarthTaco said:Am I the only one that finds a slight lack in variety of the items? It seems like the same swords, spears, and Axes appear a lot in MP for different factions.
1. I know.Pharaoh X Llandy said:Viking Conquest wasn't made by TW, it was developed by an external team.maramot said:I'm positive I won't be preordering M&BII after this fiasco. :/
2. It certainly is, as is anyone else's business whether or not they preorder it for themselves.Pharaoh X Llandy said:Whether you do or do not pre-order Bannerlord is your business
3. Well, good for them. I hold TW responsible for this release, as it was advertised and announced on their site, and the release date has been approved by them. At the very least, they didn't prevent this release.Pharaoh X Llandy said:but M&B2 is being developed by a much larger, established company who've already gone through 10 years of game creation and design from the ground up.
JuJu70 said:At the end of the day, it's really your expectations are your problem.
TheGG said:JuJu70 said:At the end of the day, it's really your expectations are your problem.
You did not just say that.
MadocComadrin said:Non-sequitur. A string of mistakes can be simply a string a mistakes.
MadocComadrin said:Likewise, do remember that M&B had early access and Warband had a closed beta followed by a free beta. The games for which Taleworlds had sole control were very play-test oriented. Likewise, since Bannerlord is essentially a new engine, some sort of large-scale beta testing should be expected.
TheGG said:JuJu70 said:At the end of the day, it's really your expectations are your problem.
You did not just say that.