I think I found the major fundamental problem with Bannerlord's balance (and it's stupid)

[Selphie Nutter]

"You don't believe me so I'm pretending you don't exist and that I'm still right."

You're wasting your breath, people like him don't need facts to back up their mouth. They are entitled to everything and therfore you must bow to their will regardless of the fact that you have facts to back up your mouth.

 

[Julio-Claudian]

"You don't believe me so I'm pretending you don't exist and that I'm still right."

I do not care at all lol

 

[Julio-Claudian]

You're wasting your breath, people like him don't need facts to back up their mouth. They are entitled to everything and therfore you must bow to their will regardless of the fact that you have facts to back up your mouth.

wtf are you even talking about?

What a completely stupid interaction.

 

[Selphie Nutter]

wtf are you even talking about?

What a completely stupid interaction.

You dropped something

*hands dummy*

 

[Julio-Claudian]

You dropped something

*hands dummy*

You're the ones getting all emotional lmao... over me saying the game would have been better if they developed and finished it as a PC game rather than trying to make it work on consoles when it wasn't even a complete game. Why do you even care this much about anything that I say? Get a grip.

 

[drivegol]

I do not care at all lol

You keep bringing it up so I find that hard to believe tbh.

 

[VVL99]

Bannerlord's balance

The game is made as a template, all events are conditionally random, mechanics exist for the sake of example, many of them are not needed for passing, and also do not represent interest in terms of the game, the plot is also as a demonstration of the possibility, having completed one or another version of the plot, you get into the same conditions. The problem is that the developer did not intend to make a full-fledged plot-strategic game from the project - try to save the game more often and each time when war is declared to you, reload the save, this way you can pass the game without unnecessary wars, AI does not wage war with you and does not react to your actions, it makes a random choice from several suitable conditions. You fight with an opponent who does not know how to win, he simply performs programmed actions, it is like playing chess with a person who does not know how to play it, and simply removes your figures from the board.

 

[Lokey7800]

Lol what "calls him out". idc about debating you over this nonsense.

Battle AI was degraded for the sake of console performance, countless features were abandoned because it would have been more difficult to implement them and have it work on consoles. If they never spent time and energy making it a console friendly game before even completing it as a pc game it would have been a much better pc game.

Well that sounds like a foolish decision we are all paying for

 

[Selphie Nutter]

You're the ones getting all emotional lmao... over me saying the game would have been better if they developed and finished it as a PC game rather than trying to make it work on consoles when it wasn't even a complete game. Why do you even care this much about anything that I say? Get a grip.

How am i getting emotional, the fact that you replied to a post that wasn't directed at you shows you are the one getting all emotional, so be a good boy and keep your dummy in your mouth because i wontchand it to you again, I'll leave you to scream next time