Humans are not omnivores.

[NordArcher]

http://www.care2.com/c2c/groups/disc.html?gpp=8775&pst=1081374
Thoughts.

 

[Lord Burgess1]

Misleading title, should be Humans are not natural omnivores

Also we aren't supposed to fly, or go into space, or wear clothes, but we do.

 

[tintontoe]

Not another one...

 

[Lord Burgess1]

Well he found another pseudo-intellect subject, what do you expect?

 

[WuTaNiSt]

Who gives a **** if it's natural, I like meat. End of.

 

[Dryvus]

Misleading title, should be Humans are not natural omnivores

Also we aren't supposed to fly, or go into space, or wear clothes, but we do.

This. And also we wouldn't be smart enough to do any of that **** if we hadn't started eating meat.

 

[LastRoman]

I like cannibalism.

Problem?

 

[Selothi]

If I want a steak I'll bloody well eat it, mother****ers !

Also, vegetarians are gay.

 

[Lord Burgess1]

If I want a steak I'll bloody well eat it, mother****ers !

Also, vegetarians are gay.

As Frankie Boyle once said

'There is a vegetarian option, you can **** off'

 

[gamerwiz09]

If we were all to live 'naturally' then we'd all have hair covering our entire body and face, we'd be naked, and we'd smell. Humans don't have a natural physic ability to communicate over distances, but hey, we can with the help of the telephone and internet. The point is we don't need to have naturally what other animals have to accomplish a certain task, because we have something they don't have: superior brains. I think we should start calling ourselves 'superiorvores' just to put those ****ing animals in their place.

Warning - while you were typing 7 new replies have been posted. You may wish to review your post.

Whaaaaaa

 

[NordArcher]

Misleading title, should be Humans are not natural omnivores

Also we aren't supposed to fly, or go into space, or wear clothes, but we do.

This. And also we wouldn't be smart enough to do any of that **** if we hadn't started eating meat.

You mean fish. It's fish that has the amino acids that helped develop our brains.
My opening post did not say anything against eating flesh. Nor did the link I gave. This is not about veganism.

 

[gamerwiz09]

Misleading title, should be Humans are not natural omnivores

Also we aren't supposed to fly, or go into space, or wear clothes, but we do.

This. And also we wouldn't be smart enough to do any of that **** if we hadn't started eating meat.

You mean fish. It's fish that has the amino acids that helped develop our brains.
My opening post did not say anything against eating flesh. Nor did the link I gave. This is not about veganism.

If we were all to live 'naturally' then we'd all have hair covering our entire body and face, we'd be naked, and we'd smell. Humans don't have a natural physic ability to communicate over distances, but hey, we can with the help of the telephone and internet. The point is we don't need to have naturally what other animals have to accomplish a certain task, because we have something they don't have: superior brains. I think we should start calling ourselves 'superiorvores' just to put those ****ing animals in their place.

 

[Dryvus]

This. And also we wouldn't be smart enough to do any of that **** if we hadn't started eating meat.

You mean fish. It's fish that has the amino acids that helped develop our brains.
My opening post did not say anything against eating flesh. Nor did the link I gave. This is not about veganism.

Uhhhm, fish definitely qualifies as meat. I could have said 'fat', since that's what brains use ridiculous amounts of, but most people are aware that meat has higher amounts of fat than most plants.

 

[NordArcher]

Yes, that is how we would live if we were to live naturally. Very interesting and mature observation indeed. I congratulate you for it! You should write a book or ask Obama to say it in one of his speeches, I assure you he'd get elected again.

This. And also we wouldn't be smart enough to do any of that **** if we hadn't started eating meat.

You mean fish. It's fish that has the amino acids that helped develop our brains.
My opening post did not say anything against eating flesh. Nor did the link I gave. This is not about veganism.

Uhhhm, fish definitely qualifies as meat.

Then why do restaurants have separate "meat" and "fish" sections? In common language fish is considered separate from meat.

 

[McBeverage]

I would not care2 read that, thank you very much.

 

[Lord Burgess1]

Then why do restaurants have separate "meat" and "fish" sections? In common language fish is considered separate from meat.

Yeah, but in an intelligent debate you use biological terms, oh wait you're here I see why you said that now.

 

[Almalexia]

Generally it is separated between 'Seafood' and 'Meat', because some people might want a steak or chicken, and then some people might want fish or shellfish. I don't see the problem here.

 

[Orj]

Um, chimps are omnivores. They don't fit the qualifications of omnivores as stated by that article, yet they still eat raw meat. The only reason we can't is because we've lost the ability.

 

[gamerwiz09]

And we make up for it through innovations, using our naturally superior brain. I don't see the problem.

 

[NordArcher]

No, in an intelligent debate you use ancient English words. Meat meant "any solid food, not necessairly the flesh of animals.". Also, there is no such word as "meat" in biology. Maybe muscle.