how about surrender

[chepox2004]

how about , losing armies, instead of fighting until last men stand( 900 vs 30 men who dont lose morale) actually surrenders on the battlefield to be captured alive

 

[stevehoos]

how about , losing armies, instead of fighting until last men stand( 900 vs 30 men who dont lose morale) actually surrenders on the battlefield to be captured alive

That would be a great idea.

 

[sniparsexe]

I agree

 

[Marcolino]

how about , losing armies, instead of fighting until last men stand( 900 vs 30 men who dont lose morale) actually surrenders on the battlefield to be captured alive

I agree. If well implemented, it would be great

 

[Moton]

It's easy such a thing would become a total headache for the player. But if it's done right it might work.

 

[black_bulldog]

 

[veronicaaltoids]

how about , losing armies, instead of fighting until last men stand( 900 vs 30 men who dont lose morale) actually surrenders on the battlefield to be captured alive

you as player to surrender to the computer? or the other way around?
oh come on, never surrender, I never surrender, and I don't want my enemy to surrender , so I can loot them after I kill them

 

[guiskj]

It is funny the surrender "mechanic" even exists when there is absolutely no reason the player would ever choose it...

I would suggest that, when choosing surrender, you are able to, through dialog, negotiate troop release, so that a good chunk of your force either gets transported to your garrison or donated to a nearby friendly vassal.

Come to think if it, I think I'll mod this in since my crappy computer can't play the game but I can't seem to step away from this game