Historical heraldry

正在查看此主题的用户

Aule_the_creator 说:
and, for the third time, I'm gonna post this link.

http://www.briantimms.net/rolls_of_arms/wijnbergen/introduction.htm

the wijnbergen armorial, written 1265-1270, and even includes an oddity, the seal of the king of iceland (I.E. king of norway in his capacity as the king of iceland), which has the axe (showing that it's added after the change, but it's drawn on the back of one of the pages). It's got france, germany, etc etc, and the last section is called "Roi", and it's got lots of royal coats of arms from the period.
Thats pretty cool aule. :grin:
Unfortunately these look like modern renderings though, wonder if we could get access to the original scans somewhere.
 
Very interesting, I wouldn't read as much into the Danish coat of arms though ( how do you see the flames btw, do you use a higher res version than I do ? ), as hearts have been used as early as King Canute IV ( 1194 ), but I would like to know why they do not feature here.

And yes, to what you said about the rampant lion, Amundr, what I meant to say was not that it wasn't rampant but only that it didn't stand as straight upwards. It is of course true that it isn't completely lying down as the front paws are never on the ground.
 
Skandinav 说:
Very interesting, I wouldn't read as much into the Danish coat of arms though ( how do you see the flames btw, do you use a higher res version than I do ? ), as hearts have been used as early as King Canute IV ( 1194 ), but I would like to know why they do not feature here.
Number 1268 here.
It has a description and a modern rendering of the original in the wijnbergen armorial.
Would be awesome if we could get a more high resolution image of that page though.
 
Did another norwegian one based on the Wijnbergen Armorial but without axe and crown.
norge5.png
 
yeah, the reason it uses flames in the modern rendering, is because it's described as using flames in the armorial, not hearts :razz:

take a look at the most recent page in the templar thread, where Kuauik has textured a swedish surcoat. I think that lion would also work for the norwegian surcoat.
 
I suppose it could work, but it has a tail with a wrong shape and it looks kinda "dirty" or low resolution.(That might change ingame though)
 
hmmm... yeah, the tail is a bit off, but the rest is perfect. However, the reason it looks dirty, is because it's a surcoat that hasn't been washed in a washing machine :razz: , it also actually looks like it's sewn onto the surcoat, as opposed to just being woven into the rest of the fabric, which is pretty much impossible xD
 
Haha if you say so aule. (wouldnt it be better to use gold or blue thread in this case though ?) :grin:
Guess we'll see ingame.
 
it's a yellow lion with gold thread stitching, which is why the stitches are lighter than the lion itself :smile: at least that's how it looks to me. I hope Kuauik is making the norwegian version RIGHT NOW :razz:
 
well, it looks like he already made a norwegian one, first page, says "norman", and it's the lion we're looking for, isn't it? although honestly, I like the surcoat of the swedes much better than the ones he used for the norwegian one :razz:
 
The Norwegian lion kuauik has used looks very nice but I think Amundr's is more appropriate as it is closer to the Wijnbergen Armorial.


Aule_the_creator 说:
yeah, the reason it uses flames in the modern rendering, is because it's described as using flames in the armorial, not hearts :razz:
Yes, I did notice that, I remarked on the fact that the hearts were used as early as the 12th century. So these flames are fancy, but quite peculiar.
 
I know, I'm poking fun  :wink:

really? I'd say that Kuauik's looks almost exactly like the lion from the wijnbergen armorial... tail and all.
 
:razz:

The composition is the same, I agree, but Amundr's version still more closely resembles the Armorial Wijnbergen's curvaceous style, I think, where kuauik's is more angular and looks more like the one from the 20th century. If I should chose after personal taste I would go for kuauik's though ( because I'm from that century myself I guess ), but I think the other one would better capture the style of the period.

Would be great with a high resolution picture of the original Armorial Wijnbergen, but as far as I can see Amundr did a very good job. But isn't the tongue red in the original, btw ?
 
well im not chosing modern style of heraldry,i like to do it in old style,but cant find any pictures and i cant draw them,i abslolutely love the old heraldry
 
Skandinav 说:
Would be great with a high resolution picture of the original Armorial Wijnbergen, but as far as I can see Amundr did a very good job. But isn't the tongue red in the original, btw ?
Hard to tell but yeah i dont see a yellow tongue so either no tongue or a red tongue that is hard to see.

It doesnt seem to have the mane spikes either so might ditch those and also make the lion itself alittle more "beefier".

I also like the modern versions alot more than the more rounded ones, ie the head of the first lion i posted.
Perhaps we should sacrifice historical accuracy on the altar of coolness. :razz:
 
Perhaps. Historical accuracy does have coolness though, but if we did it might also be more consistent with the coat of arms of the other factions - at least until we or someone else dug up correct ones for them aswell. But it is also much easier that way, certainly, as long as we cannot just copy and paste the original ones.
 
后退
顶部 底部