amondrubee
Veteran

This thread only applies to these two weapons when fighting on foot. I assume you have have proficiencies with 2h and polearms so speed and damage isn't a factor. Also, this is for fighting more than 1 opponent simultaneously.
Awpike: Only upper swing and thrust. It's easier for the opponent to block your attacks but you have extra range. At close combat your range backfires, causing your damage to decrease, but if you run backwards while attacking you do hit your opponent while maintaining distance. Appearance is somewhat amazon-warrior like.
Sword of War: Side swings seem to be easy to run around the opponents and slowly cut down the size. More attack types for feint attacks and less negative effects caused by close range combat. If two opponents have similar proficiencies and agility then Sword of War gives minor speed advantage. Slightly more asthetically pleasing due to 'royal' look.
Which weapon do you think is superior and prefer using on foot, whether against a single foe or multiple opponents?
Awpike: Only upper swing and thrust. It's easier for the opponent to block your attacks but you have extra range. At close combat your range backfires, causing your damage to decrease, but if you run backwards while attacking you do hit your opponent while maintaining distance. Appearance is somewhat amazon-warrior like.
Sword of War: Side swings seem to be easy to run around the opponents and slowly cut down the size. More attack types for feint attacks and less negative effects caused by close range combat. If two opponents have similar proficiencies and agility then Sword of War gives minor speed advantage. Slightly more asthetically pleasing due to 'royal' look.
Which weapon do you think is superior and prefer using on foot, whether against a single foe or multiple opponents?