Farewell PW... though I don't want to go.

正在查看此主题的用户

状态
不接受进一步回复。

Shrikey

Sergeant
Well people, I just got banned from RCC. Raiders sitting in tower in Glunmar Village, robbing it and rdming. Amidst them is an RCC Admin/Community Support. The Glunmar militia decide to fight back, I'm huntsman, hit this RCC guy and then find myself banned from the server. This is after he shot and killed me twice in the same siege.

So anybody who knew me, in particular you ex CG/Blacklust guys, good luck and I wish PW the best.
 
''Thats because Commoners are permitted to commit petty crimes such as thievery & robbery, but not more serious acts such as raiding/pillaging.

Im glad you enjoyed your stay on the server for the most part however as that is what we as a server are keen to provide to all of our players.''

That was the answer of my question (Why commoners rob others?) That party is more than 4-5 guys and they all admins/cs , and they all commoners
 
Just a pity that as a member of Glunmar at the time, following the orders of my lord, I can't even defend my own chest without some admin banning me for resistance...
 
Saw it happening.


Its a **** reason if you ask me, had a talking with the robbers and told me to shut up and keep myself out of it, (disrespect to another staff member)

They permbanned for breaking NLR while you just did what the lord asked to do.
 
Thats ironic- several of them had broken NLR already. And what am I meant to do if they're in the middle of the village, in the tower stealing our cash and shooting peasants at random? If I was out of line, somebody please let me know, because I just can't see it.
 
Shrikey 说:
Thats ironic- several of them had broken NLR already. And what am I meant to do if they're in the middle of the village, in the tower stealing our cash and shooting peasants at random? If I was out of line, somebody please let me know, because I just can't see it.

It wasnt even worth a permban, a tempban at highest.
 
I also saw it happen, i believe it to be an absolute disgrace, particularly with an Admin and a CS involved. They camped there in much better armour that the Glunmar Militia could afford, knowing that it would be an easy ride for them, all Glunmar could do is attack, despite them robbing from the chest constantly it is a Perm-Ban for attempting to stop them? A one-off steal from the chest is fine, but to camp there and take every single penny of it surly is against the rules. With Admins adn CS' breaking the rules, no wonder randoming and the breaking of NLR is on the rise, they probably see no issue in it for they witness Rule enforcers breaking the rules? You have my full support Shrikey.
 
Also my support too... That was completely out of rules , rules of admin's and cs ... Hope to get this misunderstanding will be cleared and ur ban will removed
 
Skhrikey, you're an old player of PW.
Don't leave for that.
I'm sure if you make an unban request and explain everything you'll be unbanned soon.

When it was United Age, I never had a complaint against you.
Maybe an error. I hope.
 
http://rccclan.com/index.php?/forum/14-ban-repeal-complaints/

Go here and make a ban repeal you should get unbanned considering How ridiculous your ban was.
You never know you might just get the admin who did this to you in trouble :grin:
 
Well the way i see it is this. First this most likely happened because everytime someone tries to rob someone in glunmar EVERYONE DECIDES TO JOIN IN because the person getting robbed fights back and then everyone else decides to attack the robbers and then all of glunmar has to get involved with it and start attacking without prior rp then everyone in glunmar gets involved and it becomes a big fight..  I know there is more to this but I'm just stating a point about people joining in on stuff they should not be joining in on.

EDIT:
I'm a CS myself i dont think people should be making judgements just yet.
 
ACtually, I always took the liberty of attacking robbers, following the principle that if
everyone does it, robbers won't dare to do their robbing within public places, as it should be.
 
Glunmar lord kept saying to go to the tower,

People did that and only ONE of them got banned for "breaking NLR'" while he just did what his lord wanted.
 
ChrisTheThird 说:
Well the way i see it is this. First this most likely happened because everytime someone tries to rob someone in glunmar EVERYONE DECIDES TO JOIN IN because the person getting robbed fights back and then everyone else decides to attack the robbers and then all of glunmar has to get involved with it and start attacking without prior rp then everyone in glunmar gets involved and it becomes a big fight..  I know there is more to this but I'm just stating a point about people joining in on stuff they should not be joining in on.

EDIT:
I'm a CS myself i dont think people should be making judgements just yet.

This is how 1000 or die work since Alpha 4.
None see a way to solve this ?
 
Serann 说:
ACtually, I always took the liberty of attacking robbers, following the principle that if
everyone does it, robbers won't dare to do their robbing within public places, as it should be.
Aye maybe one robber but you forget this was a large group of robbers. And also in the rules its stated that a person must ask for help before anybody can join in. Also how do you know everyone else is not attacking the wrong person? A bunch of commoners could rob a bunch of other commoners and you  could join in and kill all the victims. Hell if everyone went by that princable i could walk up to a knight in plate armour demand money and then run off into town square and everyone think he would be the robber and attack him.
 
only ONE of them got banned for "breaking NLR'"

Yeah just my luck. Completely agree with Chris and Aldric here, but the apex of the issue lies within whether Glunmar was right or not to try and fight back against the campers.

May as well apply for un-ban, unless anyone sees anything I've missed that justifies Fanta and Borthand.
 
状态
不接受进一步回复。
后退
顶部 底部