Damn ninja'd.
[ECS] Suggestions
- Thread starter Scar
- Start date
Users who are viewing this thread
As you can tell from the following rule:
It was never the intention to allow players from eliminated teams to play for other teams later in the tournament. It was a loophole that appeared because not all teams are eliminated at the same time.
But yeah, what Lust said basically.
It was never the intention to allow players from eliminated teams to play for other teams later in the tournament. It was a loophole that appeared because not all teams are eliminated at the same time.
But yeah, what Lust said basically.
Well I'm sure you've got people on the edge of their seats with the threat of your inevitable whining about how the top teams are scared of KURWA and their attempts to forge a super team that might topple them.pro.faiL said:Sure) I have a different theory
But as I said, I won't make drama about this topic now, but as soon as the tournament will end.
That's what you said, I didn't say and mean anything like that. It's not about our team, it's not even about this league. I'm not here to get some "new" members to our team and we actually never invited people to join us. Members you can see in our roster came and asked if they can join us.
Inevitable whining? Please Lust, I didn't expect that.
Inevitable whining? Please Lust, I didn't expect that.
pro.faiL said:
Go home, mate...
or play bf4, and if needed i can kick your ass there
relaXcz
Banned
I think there shouldn't be any argue, this tourney is good and I don't want to pour into the boiler, the rule is important IMO.
Let's just have fun, as we did with this game, we'd be grateful for tournaments at all and for Lust's work with this great community, I'm happy to be part of it
So guys, let's just have fun, it's the spirit of videogames, you can argue in RL like me or you usually do!
Let's just have fun, as we did with this game, we'd be grateful for tournaments at all and for Lust's work with this great community, I'm happy to be part of it
So guys, let's just have fun, it's the spirit of videogames, you can argue in RL like me or you usually do!
i guess this is more like a map suggestion but, add some objects to the places where there are invisible walls in maps (mainly verloren and mountain fortress) so they block the visibility through those spots. pls.
omg thug lyfe kurwa we teik in all da tröLlz
We're having some really long breaks lately.
It would be nice to have teams a little more confident in making use of this rule:
I think there are teams that would rather keep things moving a lot of the time but this is a very difficult thing for a team to force on their opponent.
It would be nice to have teams a little more confident in making use of this rule:
I think there are teams that would rather keep things moving a lot of the time but this is a very difficult thing for a team to force on their opponent.
Along that line I suggest removing all the optional tie-breaker rules in favour of the default method.Captain Lust said:
Exactly.
Was the duelling option actuallly serious? It is so ridiclious that it makes me cry at night.
Was the duelling option actuallly serious? It is so ridiclious that it makes me cry at night.
Folms said:
Don't really see the issue with the duelling method. If both teams agree I think it's an exciting way to decide a match. No team is under any obligation to do it so I fail to see how it's so awful.
I'm happy for teams to select a method, though I thought it was clear that teams could simply say they'd use the default method instantly. I'm going to look at rewording that section after the Renegades vs Teutonic Knights match.
Duels don't settle for anything.
I'm not biased. I see duels as a waste of time, maybe because I suck at them
But nevertheless, they do not determine anything. Some people are absolutely awful at duelling but great in a team, and it just puts them on the spot.
Sure the art of duelling should be awarded in some way or another, but that's why we have 3 people wearing helardic mail on Ludus. In my opinion, duelling needs to be kept seperate from major TEAM tournaments. Of course if two teams agree to have it duelled, then, sure who cares? But under no circumstances a team should be forced to duel and then to be called cowards.
I'm not biased. I see duels as a waste of time, maybe because I suck at them
But nevertheless, they do not determine anything. Some people are absolutely awful at duelling but great in a team, and it just puts them on the spot.
Sure the art of duelling should be awarded in some way or another, but that's why we have 3 people wearing helardic mail on Ludus. In my opinion, duelling needs to be kept seperate from major TEAM tournaments. Of course if two teams agree to have it duelled, then, sure who cares? But under no circumstances a team should be forced to duel and then to be called cowards.
Under the current ruleset, no team can be forced to duel. Pretty hard to regulate a bit of smack talk.Folms said:Duels don't settle for anything.
I'm not biased. I see duels as a waste of time, maybe because I suck at them
But nevertheless, they do not determine anything. Some people are absolutely awful at duelling but great in a team, and it just puts them on the spot.
Sure the art of duelling should be awarded in some way or another, but that's why we have 3 people wearing helardic mail on Ludus. In my opinion, duelling needs to be kept seperate from major TEAM tournaments. Of course if two teams agree to have it duelled, then, sure who cares? But under no circumstances a team should be forced to duel and then to be called cowards.
Yeah and that's why I'm totally against the whole idea of duelling
i just think dueling should be kept completely separate from a team tournament. not even for a tie breaker.
