Dual wielding, pros and cons why it wasn't used inside a specialized unit.
- 主题发起人 Uesugi Kenshin
- 开始时间
正在查看此主题的用户
How, exactly?Mamlaz 说:
Yes it is, because if you are not leading with your longest weapon, that means you do not have the longes possible reach.
I have no idea why you would think that - unless you haven't read my posts very carefully.
If you have nothing to say, then say nothing. I say this for your own good.
Yes you did. Here is what I said before:
"He only needs to deal with one of them. Either step back and avoid both, or step to one side and deal with the thrust from the corresponding side."
And you replied:
"No, not with two swords."
Kissaki 说:
So every single thrust is a lunge? How about you explain to everybody what a lunge is.
He was leading with the rapier, and then he passed, thus leading with his dagger in the thrust with the dagger.Wait, wait, so first you state that he was not leading with the rapier...and now you state that he was using his dagger defensively at the same time?
Austupaio
Duke
Uh, this is why HEMA, replica swords and video cameras exist. Instead of having some stupid argument that amounts to 'I can do this' 'No you can't' 'Yes I can' - How about proving it?
I wouldn't sit here and debate firing stances with any of you for an hour, I'd prove my stance or challenge you to prove yours.
I wouldn't sit here and debate firing stances with any of you for an hour, I'd prove my stance or challenge you to prove yours.
if your not preoccupying both your arms with a blade and shield...
you might as well focus all your skills on one weapon that you can control effectively...
Even Miyamoto Musashi , the master of dual wielding himself,
preferred to use a single wooden, piece of driftwood instead!
you might as well focus all your skills on one weapon that you can control effectively...
Even Miyamoto Musashi , the master of dual wielding himself,preferred to use a single wooden, piece of driftwood instead!
Austupaio 说:
Mamlaz
Sergeant Knight at Arms
Kissaki 说:
Are you serious?
You stated that the second sword would not be in range, yet in the image the mans fist is up the other dudes ribcage.
Kissaki 说:
Correct.
Still irrelevant.
Kissaki 说:
Same goes for you.
Kissaki 说:
Um yeah, that means that he cannot just do what you state he would do.
That has nothing to do with some inherent inability to deal with double thrusts.
Kissaki 说:
No.
Kissaki 说:
From the dictionary; "A lunge can refer to any position of the human body where one leg is positioned forward with knee bent and foot flat on the ground while the other leg is positioned behind."
In fencing the definition is the same; The lunge is executed by launching forward with the front foot, and pushing the body forward with the back leg.
Mamlaz 说:
No.
Mamlaz 说:
No.
Mamlaz 说:
No.
Mamlaz 说:
No.
Mamlaz 说:
Wrong.
Mamlaz 说:
Incorrect.
Mamlaz 说:
No.
Mamlaz 说:
Correct.
Mamlaz 说:
Dildo.
Mamlaz 说:
Unlike you I couldn't care less about being disagreed with on the internet. But having a person reply to tiny portions of everyone's post with an isolated "no" like you're the final authority is extremely pathetic.
Mamlaz
Sergeant Knight at Arms
jacobhinds 说:
No, it is actually a leading tool with which the person will either retreat from that statement or he/she will ask, in a more specific manner, why the statement is incorrect.
In other cases, it will lead to the interlocutor focusing on the statements that I actually properly replied to, abandoning the others, which will thin out the discussion to the sections of someones post that are actually important.
In both cases, it helps the discussion, and more importantly, me
or just move on...
类似的主题
