[parsehtml]<p><img class="frame" src="https://www.taleworlds.com/Images/News/blog_post_42_taleworldswebsite.jpg" alt="" width="575" height="290" /></p>
<p>When you set on your adventures in Calradia, it would be wise to remember the old proverb: there’s safety in numbers. The world of Bannerlord is an unforgiving place and whether peacefully trading or engaging in warfare, players will rely on troops to stand and fight by their side in order to achieve their goals. In this week’s blog, we take a look at how players will go about raising their own army in Bannerlord by discussing the game’s recruitment system.</p></br> [/parsehtml]Read more at: http://www.taleworlds.com/en/Games/Bannerlord/Blog/62
Dev Blog 31/05/18
- 主题发起人 Callum
- 开始时间
正在查看此主题的用户
Iberian Wolf 说:
the problem with this approach is that it doesnt actually reflect history, as the game is based on different regions of the world from the 6th to 12th century. Any one model of recruitment would only then apply to a certain region/period of time, and thus be as arcade and arbitrary as Warband system was. Unless you want each faction to have its own rules, which could be great or just a balance mess
If you want a specific model than you need something like a smaller region and defined period of time like VC (not that the DLC had this system, I am talking about context). Historical based mods like 1257AD, Brytenwalda, etc, can implement this as they have a clear time period to take inspiration from.
Warband was gamified, arcade and simplified to allow for a simple recruitment system and lots of battles. Yes it didnt make much sense. Yes it was absurd at times (the upgrade system). But it worked for what it was trying to do.
I also want diversity and to see other mechanics being implemented on mods, the more the better. But Bannerlord can keep the Warband-base system for its fictional world as long it is balanced and results on fun battles.
LonelyStep
Sergeant
SgtButters 说:
Dude, that's really cool. Congratulations! I'd love to know how it goes
In the time since Bannerlord released their first teaser way back in 2012 I met a girl, married her, had a baby boy, and now he'll be turning 3 next month! Sometimes life comes in a rush!
ArnulfFloyd
Knight at Arms
I wait Bannerlord but without criticize Warband, this is my last post here
piconi 说:
10 mils was just a number to point out, that you do not create games/books/movies to satisfy everyone. You do that in order to satisfy small minority of people, who will like it. You can put 5 millions there, 4 millions or whatever that will be enough sales to return devs investment.
NPC99 说:
Makes me sad again there is no mention of religion in the game :/
Imagine 4 of those NPCs are preists of different religions. They ask you to help them with performing miracles so they can sway the minds of one city population. Due to your actions this particular cult manages to gain power. They make it illegal to sell chickens (bird killing is forbidden for them). You can recruit their high lvl zealots, but local lord who owned chicken farm is royally pissed with you
Well, I guess there are always modders.
kalarhan 说:Iberian Wolf 说:
the problem with this approach is that it doesnt actually reflect history, as the game is based on different regions of the world from the 6th to 12th century. Any one model of recruitment would only then apply to a certain region/period of time, and thus be as arcade and arbitrary as Warband system was. Unless you want each faction to have its own rules, which could be great or just a balance mess
If you want a specific model than you need something like a smaller region and defined period of time like VC (not that the DLC had this system, I am talking about context). Historical based mods like 1257AD, Brytenwalda, etc, can implement this as they have a clear time period to take inspiration from.
Warband was gamified, arcade and simplified to allow for a simple recruitment system and lots of battles. Yes it didnt make much sense. Yes it was absurd at times (the upgrade system). But it worked for what it was trying to do.
I also want diversity and to see other mechanics being implemented on mods, the more the better. But Bannerlord can keep the Warband-base system for its fictional world as long it is balanced and results on fun battles.
Yeah, I agree with you. I wrote it would be nice to mod something like that. In this case, it would suit most western european factions.
But regardless, I was expecting a bit more complexity other than getting horsemen from the chicken fancier because you've got him some organic corn. I know they are placeholders, but the logic behind it makes a bit hard to immerse. But as long as it is moddable, I'm fine with it.
Iberian Wolf 说:kalarhan 说:Iberian Wolf 说:
the problem with this approach is that it doesnt actually reflect history, as the game is based on different regions of the world from the 6th to 12th century. Any one model of recruitment would only then apply to a certain region/period of time, and thus be as arcade and arbitrary as Warband system was. Unless you want each faction to have its own rules, which could be great or just a balance mess
If you want a specific model than you need something like a smaller region and defined period of time like VC (not that the DLC had this system, I am talking about context). Historical based mods like 1257AD, Brytenwalda, etc, can implement this as they have a clear time period to take inspiration from.
Warband was gamified, arcade and simplified to allow for a simple recruitment system and lots of battles. Yes it didnt make much sense. Yes it was absurd at times (the upgrade system). But it worked for what it was trying to do.
I also want diversity and to see other mechanics being implemented on mods, the more the better. But Bannerlord can keep the Warband-base system for its fictional world as long it is balanced and results on fun battles.
Yeah, I agree with you. I wrote it would be nice to mod something like that. In this case, it would suit most western european factions.
But regardless, I was expecting a bit more complexity other than getting horsemen from the chicken fancier because you've got him some organic corn. I know they are placeholders, but the logic behind it makes a bit hard to immerse. But as long as it is moddable, I'm fine with it.
Whoever you recruit from the chicken fancier, they won’t be horsemen unless they are mounted.
On the campaign map, horses greatly improve the movement speed of your party. They also vastly increase your maximum carrying load, which should be of interest to any traders or looters out there. However, you won’t be buying additional horses just for these benefits anymore: when upgrading your troops to a cavalry class, you will need to provide them with their own mount (and if you read last week’s blog you will have a good idea of how to get a steady supply of these!)
Hopefully, you’ll have to cut a separate deal for horses, which might explain the horse head icon (if not the .3 of a horse).
ArnulfFloyd
Knight at Arms
I not like so much complexity how offer modern titles, both RPG and strategy in graphical and features departaments, resulting in demanding better PC system and make games confusing but I prefer simplicity of Warband and Bannerlord. I laughing of AOE2, because upgrade of militia is named man-at-arms, also an in-depth recruitment system make few battles for players and if implementing a improved AI they will be overhalmed by many enemies
TheMaster99
Recruit
I honestly would really appreciate an honest blog post plainly stating where exactly you guys are in development. After that you can go back to the regularly scheduled interviews and posts that are barely informative, but please tell us what is going on. We've waited 6 years and we'll happily wait 6 more if we have to, but please just be transparent about how much has been done and how much more needs to be done. Please.
ArnulfFloyd
Knight at Arms
O hey, game is in development, we playing Warband until Bannerlord is released
NPC99 说:Iberian Wolf 说:kalarhan 说:Iberian Wolf 说:
the problem with this approach is that it doesnt actually reflect history, as the game is based on different regions of the world from the 6th to 12th century. Any one model of recruitment would only then apply to a certain region/period of time, and thus be as arcade and arbitrary as Warband system was. Unless you want each faction to have its own rules, which could be great or just a balance mess
If you want a specific model than you need something like a smaller region and defined period of time like VC (not that the DLC had this system, I am talking about context). Historical based mods like 1257AD, Brytenwalda, etc, can implement this as they have a clear time period to take inspiration from.
Warband was gamified, arcade and simplified to allow for a simple recruitment system and lots of battles. Yes it didnt make much sense. Yes it was absurd at times (the upgrade system). But it worked for what it was trying to do.
I also want diversity and to see other mechanics being implemented on mods, the more the better. But Bannerlord can keep the Warband-base system for its fictional world as long it is balanced and results on fun battles.
Yeah, I agree with you. I wrote it would be nice to mod something like that. In this case, it would suit most western european factions.
But regardless, I was expecting a bit more complexity other than getting horsemen from the chicken fancier because you've got him some organic corn. I know they are placeholders, but the logic behind it makes a bit hard to immerse. But as long as it is moddable, I'm fine with it.
Whoever you recruit from the chicken fancier, they won’t be horsemen unless they are mounted.
On the campaign map, horses greatly improve the movement speed of your party. They also vastly increase your maximum carrying load, which should be of interest to any traders or looters out there. However, you won’t be buying additional horses just for these benefits anymore: when upgrading your troops to a cavalry class, you will need to provide them with their own mount (and if you read last week’s blog you will have a good idea of how to get a steady supply of these!)
Hopefully, you’ll have to cut a separate deal for horses, which might explain the horse head icon (if not the .3 of a horse).
I'm aware of it, but my point was not about troop type, I just happened to type horsemen.
KhuzaitLancer80
Banned
Gab-AG. 说:FBohler 说:
Nah, you're not.
You cant be as ''okay'' as him though.
Congratz man! I met my girlfriend in the span of these years too, In fact, she is pregnant and our beautiful baby girl will be born in September. We are also planning to get married next year.SgtButters 说:
LonelyStep
Sergeant
NPC99 说:I doubt I’d like to see 16.3 horses in a final release - what’s 0.3 of a horse?
Day 37-
Group Inventory: 40 men, 70 pounds of food, 20 horses
The early snows have trapped us in the mountain pass... with no chance of escape for another three months and our supplies running low we have started eyeing our four-legged companions.
Day 42-
Group Inventory: 40 men, 0 pounds of food, 16.3 horses
...
Maybe devs can add that when you pass the cursor over the unit icon you can see its stats like attack, HP, etc.
Also, when we are be lord's maybe can we have a similar UI for recruitment, but instead of notable our vassals would appear. Maybe for be more realistic we can wait some days to our vassals come to our castle with the troops.
Also, when we are be lord's maybe can we have a similar UI for recruitment, but instead of notable our vassals would appear. Maybe for be more realistic we can wait some days to our vassals come to our castle with the troops.
