Deleted the game and will not come back until at least something changes

Users who are viewing this thread

Are you just running straight at them, shields lowered? They're easy enough to dodge with a tiny bit of lateral movement, even on foot too. Are you watching as they release as you can time it with when their animation starts too.
Fian archer accuracy, that I have issue with - but throwing weapons in this game is a joke.
This dude is straight up either running to them in foot no shields worn or he's trying to hit them with a small sword from horseback which would be hilarious to witness.

Yes I do! Because I'm obviously dumbest cretin ever, according to some wiseguys here. Then there are people who understand what I mean. Frankly, I wasted too much energy here. Who gets it, gets it. Rest, I don't care about. I'll just hope devs take notice and do a bit of tuneup. That's all I want. Adieu!
Bro, please upload a video showcasing your issue otherwise I don't understand how looters are killing you
 
Personal attack, insults
This dude is straight up either running to them in foot no shields
No. Are you seriously so ****ing retarded to think I would do something like that after 1400 hours of fighting?
he's trying to hit them with a small sword from horseback which would be hilarious to witness.
This is the ****ing point of this whole thread, which you missed again, and again, and again. You're obviously not the sharpest tool in the shed. Then,
Bro, please upload a video showcasing your issue otherwise I don't understand how looters are killing you
I won't even bother with that for someone who's clearly lacking mental capacity to understand what the **** are we even talking about.
 
To be honest the 1 on 1 combat is to easy even on the hardest setting. There are a few that show a glimmer of the wow factor but then go brainless again. I was fight Caladog in last round of a Tourny and he actually throw a faint and chopped me down.. I was over the moon . The next time we fought i gave the old dog some respect.
 
Because farming looters was in Warband. I'm not even being snarky, I think that's the main reason. I wonder if they tried some new stuff back in 2014 or whatever, but after some setbacks just thought "let's go with what we know" and reverted to Warband's grind.
Yeah Warband had some of the worst grind of any game I ever played and Bannerlord just kept up the tradition. I made a comment shortly after the ea released that I thought this game had the grind of an mmo and one of the devs was genuinely shocked. That shows just how out of touch they are with modern rpgs.
 
No. Are you seriously so ****ing retarded to think I would do something like that after 1400 hours of fighting?

This is the ****ing point of this whole thread, which you missed again, and again, and again. You're obviously not the sharpest tool in the shed. Then,

I won't even bother with that for someone who's clearly lacking mental capacity to understand what the **** are we even talking about.
My dear fellow gamers, as an intellectual with a superior understanding of strategy and tactics, I am utterly appalled by the game's blatant disregard for realism and balance. It is an insult to my intelligence and my years of dedication to this game to be taken down by looters wielding mere stones.

I must emphasize that I am not a novice in this game. I have spent countless hours perfecting my skills, and yet, I find myself constantly defeated by these low-level foes. It is simply unacceptable.

As much as it pains me to do so, I must take drastic measures. I am uninstalling the game, deleting all the files, destroying the game headquarters, and joining a terrorist cell out of sheer frustration. Such is the extent of my displeasure with this game.

The developers must take responsibility for their actions and make the necessary changes to ensure that the game is balanced and fair. Until then, I shall be taking my skills and expertise elsewhere.

In conclusion, I implore the developers to reconsider their priorities and make the necessary adjustments to restore the balance of the game. As for me, I shall be seeking solace in other games until such time as this game can meet my standards. Good day.
 
To be honest the 1 on 1 combat is to easy even on the hardest setting. There are a few that show a glimmer of the wow factor but then go brainless again. I was fight Caladog in last round of a Tourny and he actually throw a faint and chopped me down.. I was over the moon . The next time we fought i gave the old dog some respect.
It seems this depends on their skill. i got an infantry captains with 211 in 2handed and he wasn´t always just trading blows.
 
My dear fellow gamers, as an intellectual with a superior understanding of strategy and tactics, I am utterly appalled by the game's blatant disregard for realism and balance. It is an insult to my intelligence and my years of dedication to this game to be taken down by looters wielding mere stones.

I must emphasize that I am not a novice in this game. I have spent countless hours perfecting my skills, and yet, I find myself constantly defeated by these low-level foes. It is simply unacceptable.

As much as it pains me to do so, I must take drastic measures. I am uninstalling the game, deleting all the files, destroying the game headquarters, and joining a terrorist cell out of sheer frustration. Such is the extent of my displeasure with this game.

The developers must take responsibility for their actions and make the necessary changes to ensure that the game is balanced and fair. Until then, I shall be taking my skills and expertise elsewhere.

In conclusion, I implore the developers to reconsider their priorities and make the necessary adjustments to restore the balance of the game. As for me, I shall be seeking solace in other games until such time as this game can meet my standards. Good day.
Oh, playing a smart guy? Not really your game, because you missed the point, and you did numerous times in a row, bro. Trying to show off only makes even bigger **** out of yourself. For the last time, for you and all the thick headed simpletons out there:

I hereby declare that I do not, in any case, struggle, nor struggled with weakest enemies in game. I do not struggle with them on daily basis, neither have I struggled in the past. There might have been moments of overconfidence where I went with 20% health against them in starting gear and there I was vulnerable for rock salvo in the face, in exact moment where you put your shield down to make a stab. Otherwise, my performance against random bandit groups is more than great (85/86 battles won on last playthrough, you're more than welcome to post your retire screen full of leet skillz to show me how it's done). However, and again, especially for you, now focus all your mental might on this, even if it might sting:

This was never the point of this thread.

The point of this thread was unfair accuracy of AI which tends to blow you out of the water when you least expect it.

In simpler terms for you:
Enemy unfair. Too accurate. Lucky shots.

I came here voicing a valid concern, and judging by some people that agree with me, it is present. You came here to stroke your ego with "lol git gud u noob". Guess who's bigger fool here.
 
Oh, playing a smart guy? Not really your game, because you missed the point, and you did numerous times in a row, bro. Trying to show off only makes even bigger **** out of yourself. For the last time, for you and all the thick headed simpletons out there:

I hereby declare that I do not, in any case, struggle, nor struggled with weakest enemies in game. I do not struggle with them on daily basis, neither have I struggled in the past. There might have been moments of overconfidence where I went with 20% health against them in starting gear and there I was vulnerable for rock salvo in the face, in exact moment where you put your shield down to make a stab. Otherwise, my performance against random bandit groups is more than great (85/86 battles won on last playthrough, you're more than welcome to post your retire screen full of leet skillz to show me how it's done). However, and again, especially for you, now focus all your mental might on this, even if it might sting:

This was never the point of this thread.

The point of this thread was unfair accuracy of AI which tends to blow you out of the water when you least expect it.

In simpler terms for you:
Enemy unfair. Too accurate. Lucky shots.

I came here voicing a valid concern, and judging by some people that agree with me, it is present. You came here to stroke your ego with "lol git gud u noob". Guess who's bigger fool here.
Ahem, I do apologize for my prior outburst, I must regain my composure and articulate my grievances in a more sophisticated manner. As a seasoned gamer, I find myself vexed by the seemingly unfair advantage that my opponents possess. Their level of accuracy is most impressive and, dare I say, suspect. It appears as though they are landing lucky shots left and right, leading me to question the legitimacy of their skills. Such a situation leaves me feeling disheartened, as it leaves little room for improvement on my own part. One cannot help but feel as though they are at the mercy of their adversaries, and that is a most disconcerting notion indeed.
 
Ahem, I do apologize for my prior outburst, I must regain my composure and articulate my grievances in a more sophisticated manner. As a seasoned gamer, I find myself vexed by the seemingly unfair advantage that my opponents possess. Their level of accuracy is most impressive and, dare I say, suspect. It appears as though they are landing lucky shots left and right, leading me to question the legitimacy of their skills. Such a situation leaves me feeling disheartened, as it leaves little room for improvement on my own part. One cannot help but feel as though they are at the mercy of their adversaries, and that is a most disconcerting notion indeed.
Yea, I dislike holier than thou idiots, makes my blood boil. Great evade on the point loss though. And trolling! What a fine sport one turns to when they find themselves lacking arguments. How nice of you, came to senses and acknowledged what I say! You'd bring something constructive to the table otherwise, but it seems I'm right, oh how it warms my heart..
 
Last edited:
Yea, I dislike holier than thou idiots, makes my blood boil. Great evade on the point loss though. And trolling! What a fine sport one turns to when they find themselves lacking arguments. How nice of you, came to senses and acknowledged what I say! You'd bring something constructive to the table otherwise, but it seems I'm right, oh how it warms my heart..
Verily, I find myself most displeased by these holier than thou individuals, their mere existence causing my blood to reach a most concerning temperature. Despite such vexations, I must commend thee on thy great evasion of losing the point. It is indeed a fine art, one that requires skill and dexterity, traits that are not possessed by these aforementioned fools. And what of trolling? Ah, yes, a sport most noble, one that requires wit and cunning to partake in. Alas, it seems that my adversary has seen the error of their ways, and has come to acknowledge the truth of my words. It would have been most beneficial had they brought something constructive to the table, but alas, it seems that I am once again proven right. Oh, how this warms my heart and brings me closer to considering the notion of joining a terrorist cell.
 
Verily, I find myself most displeased by these holier than thou individuals, their mere existence causing my blood to reach a most concerning temperature. Despite such vexations, I must commend thee on thy great evasion of losing the point. It is indeed a fine art, one that requires skill and dexterity, traits that are not possessed by these aforementioned fools. And what of trolling? Ah, yes, a sport most noble, one that requires wit and cunning to partake in. Alas, it seems that my adversary has seen the error of their ways, and has come to acknowledge the truth of my words. It would have been most beneficial had they brought something constructive to the table, but alas, it seems that I am once again proven right. Oh, how this warms my heart and brings me closer to considering the notion of joining a terrorist cell.
You obviously want to join a terrorist cell yourself when you keep bringing it up. But ey, I proven my point, you're just wasting words and made a **** out of yourself in front of everyone, so I don't need to waste more energy on you.

For everyone else that has more than 5 braincells active at a time:
This whole supreme on foot accuracy thing doesn't pertain to only you as a player. Try sending out 5 cavs into a bunch of 20 looters, and watch them die like flies. Is that ok? It really isn't. Maybe if cav cost 1/10 of foot troop price and you didn't need to buy horses for them, it would be some weird world then, but ok. If they run into a pitchfork, aye, it's a polearm, understandable. But sending them to a meatgrinder of 1h melee that 100% kills them? That's everything but ok. 5 recruit tier cavalry should utterly destroy a bunch of 20 looters unless they brandish forks, maybe 1 falls, if you're unlucky. Higher tiers of cavalry, unacceptable. They're cream of the crop, so what do they do? Die to recruits. Pardon me for a bit, I need to recover from this fit of hysterical laughter. But, according to some, this is fine. Eh, you get the point guys, I'm outta here.
 
Last edited:
You obviously want to join a terrorist cell yourself when you keep bringing it up. But ey, I proven my point, you're just wasting words and made a **** out of yourself in front of everyone, so I don't need to waste more energy on you.
My, my, such brashness and unfounded accusations! One can only assume that your mind has been corrupted by the very same ideologies that you claim to abhor. It is a sad day indeed when individuals such as yourself resort to such baseless rhetoric in order to defend their points. I, for one, am appalled by your lack of critical thinking and the ease with which you resort to name-calling and personal attacks. It is clear to me that you have no real argument to make, and thus must resort to these childish tactics in order to save face. I shall not lower myself to your level, but I do hope that you take the time to reflect on your actions and the negative impact they may have on those around you.
 
Maybe armours should be better, but people dying to looters is still ****ing hilarious, never happened to me once
looters should be harder and you should get your ass kicked more
This dude is straight up either running to them in foot no shields worn or he's trying to hit them with a small sword from horseback which would be hilarious to witness
doesn't really fit in with
I shall not lower myself to your level, but I do hope that you take the time to reflect on your actions and the negative impact they may have on those around you
does it? Came here to make an idiot out of other people and ended up as one himself. Nice! Cool, I can go now.
 
No. Are you seriously so ****ing retarded to think I would do something like that after 1400 hours of fighting?

This is the ****ing point of this whole thread, which you missed again, and again, and again. You're obviously not the sharpest tool in the shed. Then,
'Unfair' accuracy for foot infantry is an odd issue - your OP is thinking you're supposed to be some 'hero' that can take on 10+ looters at the beginning (which you can anyways) like some Dynasty Warrior. Even late game, not uncommon for the player to have 50+kills for any battles that last more than 5min.
There's a reason why some swords are long/slow (cavalry swords) and some short/fast ones, most starting gear swords are not cavalry swords. You're not supposed to be able to easily hit infantry/looters if you both arguably have the same ranged weaponry; especially if you're further up on a mount. Missing with a 245 spear vs a 45 axe...I don't really know how to help there except just timing it better.
Infantry need to be more accurate - not less accurate; especially with cavalry timings (which does have to get better). So your complaint that your entry-level cavalry can't 1v5 looters has some merit but find out their cost difference to balance that gameplay aspect as we're just going to make infantry further useless than they already are. Even a EC 1v10 looters, I'd say they should lose - there is a reason to advantage in numbers or we stray further towards fantasy-land.
I won't even bother with that for someone who's clearly lacking mental capacity to understand what the **** are we even talking about.
Calm down, clearly you're taking this too personally.
 
Calm down, clearly you're taking this too personally.
Guy's making an idiot out of me since the start, ignoring what this thread is about, yapping only "bahaha, you lost to looters, git gud, you stupid" over and over like a broken record, bringing nothing of actual value. Then has the nerve to call me out like I'm the bad guy when I don't take his ****. Yea, I get angered easily, I know, it's a part of me and I know about it. Still, no right to act like that towards me, never did him any bad.

'Unfair' accuracy for foot infantry is an odd issue - your OP is thinking you're supposed to be some 'hero' that can take on 10+ looters at the beginning (which you can anyways)
This is a thing of me being old Warbander where there was more of a "heroism" and I sorely miss it here. But also, if we're in "more realistic" setting as this game is trying to be, a nonsense. Have you ever seen a rider on horse in real life? Horses are massive beasts and you get your neck sore talking with someone sitting on them. Hitting their leg when they sprint towards you? BS. Nonsense. You'd be jumping away from their path if you knew what's good for you. Landing a lucky swing when they're in full speed? Maaaaaaaaaybe (with not enough a's), but it wouldn't do them much wrong anyway. It's a matter of this game's weird physics, still living under the impression that two opposite speeds add up, which is a common myth (watch Mythbusters, the episode where they test the car running into another one head on), ending up in gargantuous damage to rider's leg, killing him instantly more than often, which is BS.

You're not supposed to be able to easily hit infantry/looters if you both arguably have the same ranged weaponry; especially if you're further up on a mount. Missing with a 245 spear vs a 45 axe...I don't really know how to help there except just timing it better
I'd say that's logical, shorter sword from horse would be at disadvantage against longer on ground. However (and that's what I meant with the spear vs. sword thing, didn't really miss there, but came too close to feel the wrath which is silly as they have weapons barely long enough to hit you on ground and you can easily dodge them there), they shouldn't be really able to hit you, if there's enough distance. Let's say the "reach" of weapons is in metric cm. You might not hold the 2.35m spear at the very end, ok, but neither they do hold their 45cm axe at the very end, and they're capable of reaching 1m distance with their hit. Like, wtf? It's almost like the models of these weapons are way longer than they should be. Sure, account the arm's lenght into it, but it's still too long.

Even a EC 1v10 looters, I'd say they should lose - there is a reason to advantage in numbers or we stray further towards fantasy-land
I say not. If it's supposed to be realistic, they'd have no chance. If it should be more fantasy, they wouldn't have chance either. Game-wise, it should be an ideal mix between the two. That's what the spears, pikemen and anyone with a long stick is for, to stop the charge. That we cannot differentiate from them right now so we can set them in their own category is a different matter. I'd so love to see pikes murdering a charge of heavy horsemen, me between them, don't get me wrong. It was my mistake to lead them in it, my mistake to fly straight into death. But to lead cav into something that's supposed to barely hit them and watch them die like nothing, that's just bad.
 
Last edited:
The devs and community team (Dejan and whoever his running their twitter) are completely out of touch. The game has so many bugs and issues, but meaningful communication is near non-existent. I mean, they are literally promoting things on twitter like the fog-of-war change, which was a universally loathed change. I just don't understand how management/leadership is so blind to all of this - it's actually remarkable
 
The devs and community team (Dejan and whoever his running their twitter) are completely out of touch. The game has so many bugs and issues, but meaningful communication is near non-existent. I mean, they are literally promoting things on twitter like the fog-of-war change, which was a universally loathed change. I just don't understand how management/leadership is so blind to all of this - it's actually remarkable
It's weird how games we love the most always have worst devs, isn't it? I feel the same man. It's like with Elite Dangerous, I love it to hell and back, but it needs so much more done, they got forums full of great ideas from people in case they burned out, yet development came to a standstill, communication is non-existent and game ended up on life support. Not like I think that TW's case, they only suffer from very slow tempo..
 
Honestly, I don't really agree with OP.

My only big problem with Bannerlord's combat is complete lack of horse physics. A malnourished peasant is awkwardly using his rusty pitchfork to stab my Wadar hotblood running at full speed in the best armor in the game? Why of course, my horse will immediately stop dead in its tracks and lock me in a 2 second animation. If there's high DPS enemy like Elite menavliaton nearby, I'm almost certainly dead. Combine this with AI's ability to turn 180 degrees and attack you in a split second, and sometimes this results in pretty cheap and unfair deaths.

Other than that, I don't have many problems. Bannerlord's combat system is surprisingly competent considering how terribly designed and implemented other parts of the game are.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom