Clash of the cultures.
On one hand, we have Leonion, showing typical Russian, and to a degree generally Slavic, characteristics. Saves any smile or words of praise, or even acknowledgement, for times when it really matters, easily gets confrontational, tends to respond to anything percieved as offending by responding with more of the same, and when he feels like he knows best...he acts like he does.
On the other, it appears to be product of typical US/west European consumer culture. Used to the politeness and smiles to the point he demands them even if they're fake, believes in "customer is always right", percieves any disagreement not prefaced by tons of apologetic phrases and threatening and demands to see a manager.
Now for the actual bit of criticism: the evaluation of crossbows doesn't seem to take into account properly the ammo count difference, and how large portion of the total damage it is when used with different crossbows. While the high penalty for using high powered bolts might be balanced for weaker crossbows, high powered crossbows suffer way too much from this tradeoff, despite being only marginal increase in total damage, due to higher ammo count of lower powered bolts.
For example, Master's Crossbow. With steel bolts, it's 118 damage x 40 shots. With dwarven bolts, it's 130 damage x 36 shots. Rounded, it is 10% damage increase, 10% decrease in shot count. I'd call it even tradeoff, yet the tradeoffs I had to do for it...
For dwarven crossbow, it is, rounded, 14% damage increase for 10% shot count. And again, the tradeoff, this time on horse archer...
So, yeah, I really think this needs some refinement.
On one hand, we have Leonion, showing typical Russian, and to a degree generally Slavic, characteristics. Saves any smile or words of praise, or even acknowledgement, for times when it really matters, easily gets confrontational, tends to respond to anything percieved as offending by responding with more of the same, and when he feels like he knows best...he acts like he does.
On the other, it appears to be product of typical US/west European consumer culture. Used to the politeness and smiles to the point he demands them even if they're fake, believes in "customer is always right", percieves any disagreement not prefaced by tons of apologetic phrases and threatening and demands to see a manager.
Now for the actual bit of criticism: the evaluation of crossbows doesn't seem to take into account properly the ammo count difference, and how large portion of the total damage it is when used with different crossbows. While the high penalty for using high powered bolts might be balanced for weaker crossbows, high powered crossbows suffer way too much from this tradeoff, despite being only marginal increase in total damage, due to higher ammo count of lower powered bolts.
For example, Master's Crossbow. With steel bolts, it's 118 damage x 40 shots. With dwarven bolts, it's 130 damage x 36 shots. Rounded, it is 10% damage increase, 10% decrease in shot count. I'd call it even tradeoff, yet the tradeoffs I had to do for it...
For dwarven crossbow, it is, rounded, 14% damage increase for 10% shot count. And again, the tradeoff, this time on horse archer...
So, yeah, I really think this needs some refinement.