Command and Conquer
- 主题发起人 tamuli
- 开始时间
正在查看此主题的用户
M@ster-$
Grandmaster Knight
My reaction to the RA3 previews: RA3 needs two more nukes.
Stupid Japanophiles and their desire to mess up every damned game...
Stupid Japanophiles and their desire to mess up every damned game...
Stuff started to go downhill with RA2.
RA2 was still decent, although it started to mess with the original storyline. RA3......urgh, that's just EA ****ing C&C in the balls.
The bloody graphics and animations look like SC2 ripoffs, and the introduction of the 'Japanese' faction is just plain lame. They're trying to hook the Japanophiles and Blizzard fanboys with this.
The bloody graphics and animations look like SC2 ripoffs, and the introduction of the 'Japanese' faction is just plain lame. They're trying to hook the Japanophiles and Blizzard fanboys with this.
They're just trying to get the last few cents out of this series...
They should stick to sims
They should stick to sims
Darian
Sergeant Knight at Arms
I signed up for the Red Alert 3 beta, but it's not at all what I expected. The ability to build on the water is nice on the surface (no pun intended), but in truth it means a player can outrun defeat for a prolonged period until the other player(s) build naval or aerial units, and controlling land also becomes far less crucial because so much more of the map is accessible. I preferred how the previous games had only the main building able to transform. Being able to move several buildings of a base in a few clicks just seems too easy somehow.
The game also feels overwhelmingly console-focussed; the interface is oversized and simplified and the controls are limited. A lot of function panels retract from view, even commonly used things like attack/defend commands. It also lacks a full-map zoom, which I really enjoyed in games like Supreme Commander and Sins of a Solar Empire; you can't zoom out very far and all--even at the furthest zoom level the buildings are still very big, and I can see so little at once that I feel like I'm playing at 640x480.
I also hate the theme they have chosen. Alternate histories are all well and good, but countless design decisions they've made are simply not how things would actually evolve under those circumstances--for instance, there are Zeppelins in the game. Now everybody loves Zeppelins (especially when decorated with shark faces), which is probably why they're included, but the technology would be quickly abandoned when faced with flying robots armed with lasers. They've also conveniently ignored many obvious technological combinations in order to maintain troop balance--in a world where sizeable buildings can transform into vehicles and hovercraft/VTOL technology is not only feasible but effective, why are the factions building both ships and aircraft with their future tech instead of focussing on hybrids that can take on the enemy in any environment and change their design and propulsion system on the fly to suit the conditions?
And don't even get me started on the laser-toting dolphins (yes, you read that correctly).
The game also feels overwhelmingly console-focussed; the interface is oversized and simplified and the controls are limited. A lot of function panels retract from view, even commonly used things like attack/defend commands. It also lacks a full-map zoom, which I really enjoyed in games like Supreme Commander and Sins of a Solar Empire; you can't zoom out very far and all--even at the furthest zoom level the buildings are still very big, and I can see so little at once that I feel like I'm playing at 640x480.
I also hate the theme they have chosen. Alternate histories are all well and good, but countless design decisions they've made are simply not how things would actually evolve under those circumstances--for instance, there are Zeppelins in the game. Now everybody loves Zeppelins (especially when decorated with shark faces), which is probably why they're included, but the technology would be quickly abandoned when faced with flying robots armed with lasers. They've also conveniently ignored many obvious technological combinations in order to maintain troop balance--in a world where sizeable buildings can transform into vehicles and hovercraft/VTOL technology is not only feasible but effective, why are the factions building both ships and aircraft with their future tech instead of focussing on hybrids that can take on the enemy in any environment and change their design and propulsion system on the fly to suit the conditions?
And don't even get me started on the laser-toting dolphins (yes, you read that correctly).
Darian 说:
From sonics to lasers?
Oh god...
Acording to you it's more shtty than C&C3.
Meh, a bunch of Rocketeers would take down a Kirov by the time it got anywhere close to a target. Also, dolphins used to have some sonic pulse thingy that was particularly effective against underwater nasties.
I liked the FMV for C&C3, even though the gameplay wasn't awesome, the acting redeemed it to a certain extent. Also, the GDI girls looked hawt in their uniforms. Against that, RA3 has Psychic Japanese Schoolgirls (TM), Bigass Mother****in' Mecha (TM), and Lousy SC2 Ripoff Graphics (TM). Oh, and a Butch Russian Sniper Girl (TM).
I swear EA is in league with Jack Thompson to show the depth of cruelty that us gamers are capable of.
I liked the FMV for C&C3, even though the gameplay wasn't awesome, the acting redeemed it to a certain extent. Also, the GDI girls looked hawt in their uniforms. Against that, RA3 has Psychic Japanese Schoolgirls (TM), Bigass Mother****in' Mecha (TM), and Lousy SC2 Ripoff Graphics (TM). Oh, and a Butch Russian Sniper Girl (TM).
I swear EA is in league with Jack Thompson to show the depth of cruelty that us gamers are capable of.
I preferred Grace Park.
Anyway, no love for the NOD girl?
Anyway, no love for the NOD girl?
I'm just hope they don't screw up the rendition of Hell March for the third Red Alert.
