Or a British mini-campaign for £20 where they end up being 'rescued' by Americans. Because America.The Bowman said:Oh, let me guess, it that's type of game where the Americans fought the whole war by themselves, and the Soviets were merely helping, so why add them, right? There are just so many recent games (of different genres) that cover the late war period, specifically around the Western front that it's not even funny.
Or, wait...Immediately after release, you can buy the Eastern front DLC for JUST 39.99$!1!!
Austyboo ^_^ said:All this misplaced optimism and no one's even made a joke about the half-assed name.
That was CoD1, with the Sten. I'm biased so I always prefered the British missions, but the Soviet ones were good too. American ones were alright.null said:When I played early COD games as a kid I always found the British missions much more fun than the US ones, and that was before I even had a bias. I remeber a particular mission where you had to attack a dam and you had one of those cool sideways guns. Or was that a different game? I dunno.
Woof, now you've got me hopeful.Jacobhinds said:I did, but everyone thought I was joking.
I selfishly hope this is a bigger clustermess of an omni-fail than COD ghosts or even Master Defect: An Dromedary. Whenever a really complexly bad game comes out I get 10-20 hours of analysis on youtube right off the bat. Even thinking about TotalBiscuit's potential 200 minute video is making my mouth water.
Его Высокопревосходительство said:"Unlike Medal of Honor, we're trying to tell the story of the average soldier in real situations, not spies and commandos doing incredible feats."
*proceeds to make one third of the game about commandos*