ok guys, what do you think of this one?
System Builder
pcpartpicker.com
Wait, so 3600 is better then 3600x?just take Intel i5-9400f, Nvidia GTX 1660 Super, and 16 GB of RAM(in 1 chip and later buy another 16 GB),and motherboard something with Z - MSI z390-a pro it will be enough for few years (pretty budget build)
ps: ryzen 5 3600 is better
Also, I want 32g ram for a specific game I seen the min req is 16 and recommended ram is 32just take Intel i5-9400f, Nvidia GTX 1660 Super, and 16 GB of RAM(in 1 chip and later buy another 16 GB),and motherboard something with Z - MSI z390-a pro it will be enough for few years (pretty budget build)
ps: ryzen 5 3600 is better
I understand the all intel is better, but when u take intel vs amd for the same price point, amd is better, also when it's time to upgrade cpu, most likely u can stay with the same motherboard on amd, intel most likely you would need to replace the motherboard as well.We’ll know soon enough with benchmarks on EA. I have 9600k 16g 3200 ram samsung evo nvme and a nvidia 1060. It’ll do the job fine. Saving up for a nvidia 30xx series as I gave the 20xx series a miss.
I like amd’s and I my last pc was one but I found most of the time the intels just run faster. Hopefully that will change.
sorry my bad ryzen 5 3600x is better ! I will edit my post .Wait, so 3600 is better then 3600x?
yeah 20xx series is a big disappointment .We’ll know soon enough with benchmarks on EA. I have 9600k 16g 3200 ram samsung evo nvme and a nvidia 1060. It’ll do the job fine. Saving up for a nvidia 30xx series as I gave the 20xx series a miss.
I like amd’s and I my last pc was one but I found most of the time the intels just run faster. Hopefully that will change.
Theres a game that's in development at the moment and the rec specs for it are 32g ram while min is 16g rammaybe for huge game files you might actually use more than 16gb of ram, but only if those games were optimized to be used with an old platter style hard drive. which might exists, but I would think of those games more as a unicorn than the status quo. most games are optimized to use 2 sticks of 8GB and rarely ever use more than the first stick of ram, especially if they are coupled with an NVMe drive piping data to the ram at a staggering 16GB a second.... not even close to the ballpark of platter disk rate of 200MB a second.. it's in another universe. just something to consider, you really are going against the grain if you choose 2 sticks of 16GB
Nice ?yeah 20xx series is a big disappointment .
I have i7-8700k, 32GB RAM 3000 MHz, and Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1080 Mini ITX 8GB GDDR5X - for super small case .
My build -Mini-ITX "No Compromise Build"
Are you getting NVMe? That’s really a must IMHO. The load times are day and night compared to older HDDTheres a game that's in development at the moment and the rec specs for it are 32g ram while min is 16g ram
yeah NVMe is cool but can be a little bit expensive, so for games I use Samsung 860 QVO SSD 2TBAre you getting NVMe? That’s really a must IMHO. The load times are day and night compared to older HDD
There's very little to choose between them. The X is more expensive and has slightly higher clocks and a better cooler, but I think even that cooler leaves a lot to be desired.Wait, so 3600 is better then 3600x?
Wait for testsI have R5 2600 Rx590 (blue one) 2x8 gb 3000 mhz ram and sata ssd can i run 500v500 battles in ultra graphics (maybe anisotropic filtering and shadow quality like settings could be medium or high) with 45+ fps ?