[BoP: 1700] Signup Thread - Players Announced!
- 主题发起人 HULKSMASH
- 开始时间
正在查看此主题的用户
- 状态
Matiss_Veinbergs
Banned
Sorry, accidently deleted previous post.
Lets not make our religious differeneces judge our oppinions, shall we?
Lets not make our religious differeneces judge our oppinions, shall we?
Jagiello 说:
Don't make me send Brutus after you.
I do want to clear up the mobilized/demobilized conversation.
My point, as initially stated, was simple: Do not expect the one-turn shield to save you in case of invasion. Build up your military or make diplomatic alliances - remember that allied nations can put your government back in power and place you back in the game.
I did, unfortunately, make a mistake in using a demobilized Netherlands as an example, a nation that could hold off an invasion quite decently while demobilized, primarily due to both natural and man-made fortifications. Having your army be mobilized when you are invaded will be an advantage, but it is not strictly necessary and is rather unlikely to lead to losing an entire war in the first turn of a war. I take responsibility for illustrating my point poorly.
And that will be all I will say on that, more information on how mobilizing/demobilizing works will be in the opening post of the game thread.
You just have an inexplicable obsession with this "one turn shield crutch" thing Eternal, something that happened like 1 time and with players that don't even bother with BoP anymore nor are in it. If you hadn't even mentioned it, people wouldn't even consider it existing, there's very generally common sense with these things here.
Your comment just doesn't make much sense. No country aside from like german small states would let themselves get annexed in 1 year regardless. A demobilized Austria, Poland, France, Spain, Sweden, Denmark, Portugal, GB, etc etc would at the very least defend themselves with forts and militias. Then again they could lose a great deal of their territory, almost losing the war thus, hence putting them in great handicap and that is their punishment.
It's frankly unrealistic for you to expect any country to fall in 1 turn. This isn't Poland in WW2 and noone's a blitzkrieging Germany.
Your comment just doesn't make much sense. No country aside from like german small states would let themselves get annexed in 1 year regardless. A demobilized Austria, Poland, France, Spain, Sweden, Denmark, Portugal, GB, etc etc would at the very least defend themselves with forts and militias. Then again they could lose a great deal of their territory, almost losing the war thus, hence putting them in great handicap and that is their punishment.
It's frankly unrealistic for you to expect any country to fall in 1 turn. This isn't Poland in WW2 and noone's a blitzkrieging Germany.
Yes, that's a big part of why this debate is important, too. Why do you say "let's drop it" and make a further comment? Plus if we drop it, the hosts might disagree, there is no problem with constructive discussion young Mahud, rather the opposite.MaHuD 说:
Ah spare me, I'm seriously not going to sugarcoat my posts with smileys and "mate, buddy, pal" to make it 100% clear that I'm not being passive aggressive, all I said was entirely neutral.MaHuD 说:
- 状态
