Blatant Election Fraud in Russia - People Moderately Surprised

[Swadius 2.0]

What do you mean by vibrations?



Also, you can't dilute something to the point it's not present, only proportionately less of it.

He's referring to homeopathy. Where people believe that water can take on characteristics of the stuff poured into them no matter how little there is in the water counter to what chemistry  and physics actually tell them.

 

[Duke Daniel Milutin]

It's not like USA's number 1. goal is to help a country when they organize an armed rebellion, and blames the current government for genocide and tyranny just to invade the country and make it to their new colony and maybe a conflict area to sell weapons to if they are lucky. If they want to get rid of tyranny and genocide in the World, they need to start with themselves.

Uhuh. Which is why we shouldn't complain about China and Russia, who in addition to doing all of those things are also abusing their own citizens? Great logic there.

Thanks. Also, USA aren't abusing their own citizens? When have they ended doing that? They are a lot better to hide their crimes though, I can give them that.

 

[Mage246]

US abuse of its own citizens is to China's abuse of its own citizens
As
The occasional spanking by your parents is to frequent and horrific physical and sexual abuse by your parents

You clearly know nothing about both the US and China.

For example, the US govt is horrible about keeping secrets. And keeping something a secret that happened in public? Essentially impossible. Literally, I don't see how it could ever be done. It would be on the internet in 5 minutes and on the national news by the evening.

China, on the other hand? Recent solid evidence has come out that China has been executing political prisoners for YEARS in order to HARVEST THEIR ORGANS.  They managed to keep it as only a rumor for a very long time. I couldn't make this **** up if I tried.

 

[Duke Daniel Milutin]

For example, the US govt is horrible about keeping secrets. And keeping something a secret that happened in public? Essentially impossible. Literally, I don't see how it could ever be done. It would be on the internet in 5 minutes and on the national news by the evening.

A large part of the media is controlled and censored by them. If the US government decides to remove you, none will be there to post it on internet or report to a TV channel.

US abuse of its own citizens is to China's abuse of its own citizens
As
The occasional spanking by your parents is to frequent and horrific physical and sexual abuse by your parents

Come and tell that next time FBI tests torture methods on you.

 

[Swadius 2.0]

For example, the US govt is horrible about keeping secrets. And keeping something a secret that happened in public? Essentially impossible. Literally, I don't see how it could ever be done. It would be on the internet in 5 minutes and on the national news by the evening.

A large part of the media is controlled and censored by them. If the US government decides to remove you, none will be there to post it on internet or report to a TV channel.

Do you have any evidence that the media in the US s controlled by the government? Most of them seem to me to be owned by private individuals and corporations. Not only this but you would have to censor access to other western countries too. Chinese media on the other hand...

 

[rebelsquirrell]

For example, the US govt is horrible about keeping secrets. And keeping something a secret that happened in public? Essentially impossible. Literally, I don't see how it could ever be done. It would be on the internet in 5 minutes and on the national news by the evening.

A large part of the media is controlled and censored by them. If the US government decides to remove you, none will be there to post it on internet or report to a TV channel.

Do you have any evidence that the media in the US s controlled by the government? Most of them seem to me to be owned by private individuals and corporations. Not only this but you would have to censor access to other western countries too. Chinese media on the other hand...

I think he is trying to speak of indirect control, controlling the money flow and what not. As opposed to China's direct system.

At any rate I blame the Illuminati, Knights of The Golden Circle, Freemasonry, and the Loosely Affiliated Syndicate of Morally Skewed Acquaintances.

 

[Swadius 2.0]

As far as I know, media corporations have more power over the US government than the US government has over them. In any case, what sort of indirect control of money are you talking about? The BBC is the only one that I know of that is funded directly from the government. You've also need to take into consideration that indirect control doesn't work when you can access news from other countries that aren't under the control of the county you're in.

 

[socks]

Come and tell that next time FBI tests torture methods on you.

Excellent counterargument. You sure proved him wrong with that zinger.

 

[Mage246]

I know you're being sarcastic but I doubt he does. He may be (incompetently) referring to so-called "enhanced interrogation" (torture" which was practiced on military detainees. Not sure what relevance that has to the FBI or domestic civil rights, though. I don't think the FBI was involved in that except to say that it doesn't work and shouldn't have been tried.

It's ok, he's clearly a misinformed halfwit. Government control of the media? So clueless. Yeah, the media really does control the government more than the other way around. 24 hour news and polemical demagogues often prevent the government from tackling serious matters by derailing them with minor nonsense.

People from places where the government really does control the media can't seem to conceive of anything else - which is something I find very sad and doesn't bode well for the future (1984 and all that).

 

[rebelsquirrell]

As far as I know, media corporations have more power over the US government than the US government has over them. In any case, what sort of indirect control of money are you talking about? The BBC is the only one that I know of that is funded directly from the government. You've also need to take into consideration that indirect control doesn't work when you can access news from other countries that aren't under the control of the county you're in.

Well one thing that you need to take into account is I don't believe that the government controls the media or the other way around. I was simply trying to indicate what the other man was getting at. (At least what I thought he was getting at.)

Wearing tinfoil hats and drinking poisonous koolaid is not a healthy lifestyle.... So I do not engage in them.

 

[Swadius 2.0]

As far as I know, media corporations have more power over the US government than the US government has over them. In any case, what sort of indirect control of money are you talking about? The BBC is the only one that I know of that is funded directly from the government. You've also need to take into consideration that indirect control doesn't work when you can access news from other countries that aren't under the control of the county you're in.

Well one thing that you need to take into account is I don't believe that the government controls the media or the other way around. I was simply trying to indicate what the other man was getting at. (At least what I thought he was getting at.)

Wearing tinfoil hats and drinking poisonous koolaid is not a healthy lifestyle.... So I do not engage in them.

I know you're not into that stuff , it's just that if that is the position he's raising, I have given the rebuttal to it.