-
If you are reporting a bug, please head over to our Technical Support section for Bannerlord.
Beta Patch Notes v1.0.2
- Thread starter Dejan
- Start date
Users who are viewing this thread
Not that unusual, this is a beta for the upcoming patch.
That doesn't always happen on my end. In fact I can change the outcome most of the time.
They do surrender if they are outnumbered. But it's like 10 vs 100.
That's a Warband feature...
I believe that only happens when the winner is in too many wars simultaneously so they want to make peace before they lose it all.
I agree with the rest though.
five bucks
Knight at Arms
I tested 30 different votes with 100 and 0 relation, here were the results.
Why Bannerlord Voting is Broken, and How To Fix It
The voting system is almost pointless, because the lords almost always vote the same as each other, so even by spending 150 Influence you can't change the outcome. To test, I set my relation to 0 with every clan in Vlandia, and proposed every policy: 26 of the votes could not be changed by the...
forums.taleworlds.com
My bad, I meant to say "no lords/garrisons ever surrendering". Looters do surrender yes, but lords never ever do. And you don't have the option to request garrisons to surrender, nor do they offer to.
I just tested it in the game right now: I got 2000+ troops and challenged Bortu (a Cowardly, Calculating lord). Bortu's party was only 140 strong. Bortu still agreed to fight me.
I also besieged Makeb's garrison of 200 with 7000 troops. They didn't surrender even after smashing all walls and calling an assault.
All lords are suicidally brave, regardless of whether they are supposed to be or not.
True, but one would think that over 10 years of development time on this sequel, someone would have figured out how to simply increase the damage value of spears.That's a Warband feature...
Thankyou.
why should there be? U mean you get tricked for years in EA and suddenly they release a totally different game 1 week after EA ends?
EA is just the path to release.
This core game mechanic has some kind of reverse logic, resulting in strange loops.
The losing kingdom will keep attacking until it gets what it wants.
The winning kingdom will seek peace because an other conflict started or because it can afford it, and will pay a tribute.
For me the main issue here is that there is literally no war exhaustion.
A defeated faction will keep an aggressive stance, even with an army of recruits.
Even worse, a kingdom without any fiefs will still receive gold from thin air and keep hiring mercenaries to harass other kingdoms and eventually take back some fiefs...
In one of my campaign, fiefless Northern Empire keeps declaring war on Sturgia for no real reason except "renegotiating" the tribute. And of course Sturgia automatically builded an army (though of course there is no army to fight against, neither any fief to besiege...)...
No!
five bucks
Knight at Arms
Hm, the Sanala town scene is nice. So is that all the town scenes now? By my last count there was 1 missing but I can't tell which one it is.
I tested 30 different votes with 100 and 0 relation, here were the results.
Why Bannerlord Voting is Broken, and How To Fix It
The voting system is almost pointless, because the lords almost always vote the same as each other, so even by spending 150 Influence you can't change the outcome. To test, I set my relation to 0 with every clan in Vlandia, and proposed every policy: 26 of the votes could not be changed by the...
Good effort and suggestions, it's a shame that both good and bad feedback gets ignored... I wonder if they changed something though? I'll try to take a closer look at the next votes in my current playthrough.
Yes, that's stupid. Most people already should surrender when they are fighting 50 vs 200. They could actually use those traits for it...
Can't argue against that.
You are most welcome.
10tributedaily
Recruit
Any word on these two major bugs?
forums.taleworlds.com
forums.taleworlds.com
In Progress - Can't get experience and captured equipment if a second battle happens.
After the first big battle when too many soldiers run away, we have to fight a second small battle to kill these soldiers who run away. After that I can only get the soldier experience and the equipment of the second battle. The experience and equipment of the first battle will lost. That is a...
forums.taleworlds.com
In Progress - You Always Have to Fight to the Last Man After Rout
Summary: When the AI retreats after having spawned all of its troops, no matter the battle size and even when waves is set to "unlimited" you have to fight the enemy again. Let's say you have a 500v500 battle, and you lose 100 and they lose 450 and 50 retreated. You HAVE to fight 450 to 50 if...
forums.taleworlds.com
Rather sad to watch Taleworlds turn someone who was an enthusiastic supporter (to the point of creating a YouTube channel dedicated to their game) into more and more of a disappointed cynic here on the forums.
During this whole development process I'd argue there's one thing they have done exceedingly well:
Turn former enthusiasts into dissatisfied, disgruntled, critics.
I would boil it down to some group in the company is clearly incompetent. I don't know if it's unskilled QA, out of their depth Developers, incompetent Middle Management, or a crisis of leadership from the very top C level down, handcuffing those at lower levels. Whatever it is, I'd argue the only real "fix" is a complete tear down, new talent search, and rethink of how projects are handled. I say this not out of vitriol or malice, but with an eye to improvement as a former enthusiast. I know it certainly doesn't sound pleasant, but: "The truth is a bitter pill, that few men dare to swallow." as one of my mentors used to say.
Lastly, before anyone lambasts me for being mean, rude, or unfair. Please try to remember that this is a company that has made millions off their product. A product that is largley unsatisfactory I'd say. I'm not trying to attack individuals as people, I am trying to offer what I feel is constructive criticism to professionals, as a customer.
We've been trying to provide constructive criticism for years now since EA release (and some before) for a video game aspect; unfortunately, highly doubt they take any feedback an the IRL sense.
The QA is just catastrophic.
How many times MrRay said that whatever UI bugs were fixed but didn't pass the testing phase and didn't make it for xxx patch release.
And look at all those issues that are still "in progress" though clearly ruining the gaming experience of so many players.
Ensuring the quality of their product should be a top priority.
what? savegames have ALWAYS (with exception of 1 update, discounting the need to go through 1.7 in EA to load in newer) been compatable between game versions as well as beta/main.
banner editor overhaul would be welcome (I really expected it to be like in Manor lords) but that hasnt been mentioned in their plans and for diplomacy they have for a long time said they dont really wanna change it (fine imo, but obviously many complaints). Where did you hear about this?
Sounds too good to be true, hmm....
Vahouth
Recruit
Do I have to start a new game for this?
Last edited:
