Beta Patch Notes e1.9.0

[CaptainFracas]

I assume that 0.2 means 20 % increase in charge damage ?

 

[Teutonic_Tirade]

Adjusted the algorithm responsible for resizing the helmets to correctly fit the different head shapes, removing the bug that caused helmets to be too large.

Thank you!

 

[Rivet]

Increased the theoretical limit for concurrent players on a custom server to around 1000.

XD

 

[MRay]

Either way man thanks for all the communications throughout the years and the awesome UI/UX design work!

Thank you as well for the suggestions and feedback on the UI subforum!

I assume that 0.2 means 20 % increase in charge damage ?

Yes, this has been fixed internally but didn't make it to the patch. It'll be changed in the future patches.

 

[Lesbosisles]

We now have sword sisters, nice

Finally some real game changing stuff...

Added Banners and the Banner Bearers feature.

Got a banner from the battle. The bonus is 'Decreased shield damage by -0.1'... Bruh

 

[OptiqueMarquis]

Groovy.


Have companion spawns been fixed?

 

[OptiqueMarquis]

I assume that 0.2 means 20 % increase in charge damage ?

how can you tell what tier it is?

 

[Brano]

Nice, big one. And I thought I will spend this evening in the pub. Well, change of plans

 

[Guiflick]

What about the soldiers flickering/bumping into each other, has it been fixed too ? <3

 

[Totalgarbage]

What about the soldiers flickering/bumping into each other, has it been fixed too ? <3

The patch says that the AI movement has been revamped, let's hope that it's much better now.

 

[niekdegrijze]

I assume that 0.2 means 20 % increase in charge damage ?

Nice for multiplayer, I do not like these unrealistic magic buffs in single player games

 

[stevepine]

Is there any chance of some new tavern scenes post launch? Or will this be left to modders? @Dejan
@MRay @Duh_TaleWorlds

One per culture seems....well..... just rather lacking. To put it mildly.

Don't know why but this is my pet issue in the game.... along with no weather. I guess I'm an atmosphere junkie.

 

[Guiflick]

The patch says that the AI movement has been revamped, let's hope that it's much better now.

Hell yeah! thanks dude

 

[nereid]

how can you tell what tier it is?

I think it depends on the fringe of the banner. I got a simple one with about 5% damage against cavalry with a simple fringe instead of the tassels.

 

[El Capitan]

Still no companions

 

[Galvar]

Looks pretty nice. It's still missing peace time related activities that I'd love to have, but it's probably better that you're focusing on improving combat first.

I'd prefer to at least wait for you to implement the ability to attack specific formation before I come back to the game, but if people give positive reviews of this new pathing system, I'll give it a go.

 

[Axer]

Good stuff.
If you add siege weapon reticle please add an option to disable it.

As for banners. I find it a little odd that its nobles that are carrying them. I understand why you want to offer them to the player and player clan members, but I feel like AI lords should have a banner bearer with them rather than carrying it themselves? Noble doing the hard work is a bit odd imo.

 

[MaestroG4]

we didnt get the soldiers jittering fixed, or am I not seeing it? Shame if not, great job however.

 

[Julio-Claudian]

Good stuff.
If you add siege weapon reticle please add an option to disable it.

As for banners. I find it a little odd that its nobles that are carrying them. I understand why you want to offer them to the player and player clan members, but I feel like AI lords should have a banner bearer with them rather than carrying it themselves? Noble doing the hard work is a bit odd imo.

Is it actually nobles carrying them? Or Is it that Heroes can equip them but in-battle they are carried by a banner bearer?

 

[CaptainFracas]

It seems like Revyl and Omor are the same scenes. Not 2 new ones.