Thanks for the info! Good luck with troubleshooting of the blocker issue...We have some more blocker issues to resolve before releasing the next live/beta patches. The moment that happens I'll be happy to let you know.
Thanks for the info! Good luck with troubleshooting of the blocker issue...We have some more blocker issues to resolve before releasing the next live/beta patches. The moment that happens I'll be happy to let you know.
Thank you for the answer, we are really looking forward to the update! Good luck!We have some more blocker issues to resolve before releasing the next live/beta patches. The moment that happens I'll be happy to let you know.
You and I both know that isn’t true.And nope, again there won´t be any ****storm if they would fail to deliver it in 2 weeks if they would just communicate this upfront again.
It would be true, only extremists like MostBlunted would rage about it.You and I both know that isn’t true.
I don´t see any ****storm here and Dejan only said "it´s ready when it´s ready and it´s delayed because of reasons" which is no real information at all, so....I mean the next Elder Scrolls also will be ready when it´s ready. This information from Dejan is just "useless", still no ****storm?!You and I both know that isn’t true.
I don't understand this common sentiment: right now you can just treb down the walls and the siege pathfinding works good enough, so why is "Sieges are fixed" , (which I take to mean "troops go up ladders and siege towers, troops attack second door") even considered a big upgrade? And sorry @Bunduk because is this isn't just meant at you, I see this type of things said very often and I just don't get it.If Sieges are fixed finnaly in the next patch. That would be enough for me. Iam looking forward to the new additions. Especially to cut scenes and other small immersion mechanics.
You are making a good point.I don't understand this common sentiment: right now you can just treb down the walls and the siege pathfinding works good enough, so why is "Sieges are fixed" , (which I take to mean "troops go up ladders and siege towers, troops attack second door") even considered a big upgrade? And sorry @Bunduk because is this isn't just meant at you, I see this type of things said very often and I just don't get it.
You can already finish all the sieges in the game with trebs, so why does watching guys go up a ladder or siege tower really improve anything?
Also I wonder if ladder/tower enthusiasts know that with the improved ballista they will still take heavy losses while que'n up for the ladders/tower.
Radical extremists ruining my games smh, can't believe this is Biden's America.It would be true, only extremists like MostBlunted would rage about it.
If a patch got delayed, I'm pretty confident in seeing "Patch delayed lol Failworlds" threads.I don´t see any ****storm here and Dejan only said "it´s ready when it´s ready and it´s delayed because of reasons" which is no real information at all, so....I mean the next Elder Scrolls also will be ready when it´s ready. This information from Dejan is just "useless", still no ****storm?!
And don´t get me wrong, I´m not saying there should be a ****storm. Just saying TW could start providing us with more (any) information at all and it won´t hurt anybody.
maybe because we want to play the game the way it's meant to be played??I don't understand this common sentiment: right now you can just treb down the walls and the siege pathfinding works good enough, so why is "Sieges are fixed" , (which I take to mean "troops go up ladders and siege towers, troops attack second door") even considered a big upgrade? And sorry @Bunduk because is this isn't just meant at you, I see this type of things said very often and I just don't get it.
You can already finish all the sieges in the game with trebs, so why does watching guys go up a ladder or siege tower really improve anything?
Also I wonder if ladder/tower enthusiasts know that with the improved ballista they will still take heavy losses while que'n up for the ladders/tower.
It's like graduation party for a 25yo getting their GED.... okay that's great and all but it's ABOUT TIME and no need for extra celebration or praise.
You should take heavy losses waiting to get on a ladder to storm a wall. That happened in real sieges.I don't understand this common sentiment: right now you can just treb down the walls and the siege pathfinding works good enough, so why is "Sieges are fixed" , (which I take to mean "troops go up ladders and siege towers, troops attack second door") even considered a big upgrade? And sorry @Bunduk because is this isn't just meant at you, I see this type of things said very often and I just don't get it.
You can already finish all the sieges in the game with trebs, so why does watching guys go up a ladder or siege tower really improve anything?
Also I wonder if ladder/tower enthusiasts know that with the improved ballista they will still take heavy losses while que'n up for the ladders/tower.
It's like graduation party for a 25yo getting their GED.... okay that's great and all but it's ABOUT TIME and no need for extra celebration or praise.
Yes, but then WHY is using the ladders GOOD? Why do people pretend to care? You save campaign time by not having to replace HQ troops when you build the trebs and destroy everything, it takes way longer to march back to ________ and raise up _______ troops then spend the time taking out the siege gear and the walls! I only attack strait away on maps where I know I can out position them and have minimal losses while shooting down at least 50% of defenders before charging up the ladders, I know it's unlikely even one other person reading this forum knows what I'm talking about, but not all sieges are the same.You should take heavy losses waiting to get on a ladder to storm a wall. That happened in real sieges.
Oh the laziest, most wasteful, skill-less way you could do a siege and it's ruined by a bug, oh what a great update to finally be able to ram guys up a ladder faster! This changes everything!??♂️maybe because we want to play the game the way it's meant to be played??
I prefer to have complete sieges myself for 2 reasons : 1) It is slightly more immersive 2) It makes taking a city feel like a real achievement because of the time i invested in it.I don't understand this common sentiment: right now you can just treb down the walls and the siege pathfinding works good enough, so why is "Sieges are fixed" , (which I take to mean "troops go up ladders and siege towers, troops attack second door")