running caravans
-
If you are reporting a bug, please head over to our Technical Support section for Bannerlord.
Beta Patch Notes e1.5.7
- 主题发起人 Callum
- 开始时间
正在查看此主题的用户
So you would run caravans before you run caravans?
Really, it's been months of "exploring the possibilities" just give us the pre placement! I will make every battle 100X more enjoyable to not have to hammer in 20 commands to get everyone in a good spot before that 1 mounted enemy gets their and cheap shots a t6.
I thought you were asking how to get trade on companions
if a clan member run a party, trade skill increases very, very, very slowly. basically, there is no way to increase trade skill for relatives in this game as it now.
p.s. it would be nice if TW would allow relatives and companions to get Charm by donating nobles to a dungeon. it is not that hard to make i believe.
最后编辑:
Because
Sergeant
Yep this would be brilliant was so disappointed when they revealed that the old tactics perk to do this didn't work and then they pulled it anyway.
I'm altogether disappointed with the "tactics" line. I was most excited about that one but it is so geared toward "simulated" battles (which I will almost never do), and the payoff is otherwise so low I don't see hardly any value in it and will be pursuing leadership instead. Honestly, tactics should be a very strong perk tree, maybe one of the best and it's really quite lame right now.
It's a joke that to get better at tactics you need to actually not participate in your battles or otherwise slowly climb that worthless tree.
And, yes, I agree we should have pre-battle placement! How could this not be in the game!
It's a joke that to get better at tactics you need to actually not participate in your battles or otherwise slowly climb that worthless tree.
And, yes, I agree we should have pre-battle placement! How could this not be in the game!
i have never received 1 xp from operating caravans, even though I have teh perk.... must be bugged somehow in my game?
This game has another year or more until it's ready to exit EA.
tlowey
Sergeant at Arms
I had always thought that. I am more convinced now that little more will be added to the game and EA will be over sooner than we think. Modders will then give us the game we want.
Best way to get xp on tatics is to join an AI army and fight in battles, even if i don't lead any formation i get a ton of xp on tatics
It is apparently balanced around a player who stays at or near maximum party size, frequently fights other parties or armies that are somewhat larger and occasionally retreats while leaving troops behind.
At least, when I played like that, it leveled pretty quickly.
__Heizenberg__
Recruit
Did anyone encounter a bug where you couldn't attack any parties and because of that sea raiders regarding Azargos quest respawned indefinitely because they where killed by other parties and not by me. Any suggestions where I should report this?
最后编辑:
i mentioned that to mexxico some weeks ago, if you can make a report please do that. those raiders wipe armies out.
A few weeks ago I had made a relevant suggestion titled "Assimilation and Multiculturality" which didn't see any interaction: https://forums.taleworlds.com/index.php?threads/assimilation-and-multiculturality.436800/
As it is the game is very monotonous and monocultural. Even North Korea has a couple foreigners every now and then, but all towns are culturally uniform and static.
Below is the text of the post I linked:
As it is the whole culture thing in the game is pretty static. A nice addition would be the following two game mechanics:
1) Assimilation
If a settlement stays under another culture's hold for long enough a time (like a couple decades), slowly the notables change cultures. E.g. Battania took Lageta and held it for 30 in game years. Assume there are 5 notables. After that time, one by one, notables convert to Battanian culture, and the troops they provide change to Battanian trees. Battanian items pop up in the marketplace, and locals start dressing up like Battanians. Sometimes, randomly, the town's tournament is Battanian style, and as time goes by, like say in 60 or 70 or 100 years Battanian culture takes over. Same for all cultures. You could even add translations of all settlement names for each culture so that say after 100 years in game there's a chance that Lageta becomes, say, Laghaith (could even be an algorithmic change).
Tangentially, it'd be neat if the player could rename settlements that belong to their clan.
There could also be relevant kingdom policies like 'Elite Dominance' where the conquering kingdom forces their culture. It'd have loyalty and prosperity penalties but if the clan can offset that the conversion is slightly faster. If they fail this would accelerate rebellions, which would be a nice little combination.
2) Multiculturality
As it is, settlements have notables only of settlement culture. This looks and feels very artificial. It'd be nice if there was a random chance esp. towns would have notables from other, mostly neighbouring cultures. Their troop trees would still be of local cultures, but if Assimilation is implemented, these would be the first to convert if the conquering culture is same as theirs.
E.g. Varcheg neighbours Battania. By random chance it has one Battanian notable. The notable gives Sturgian recruits (but maybe also Battanian ones every now an then, rarely??). Now imagine Battania takes Varcheg over and holds it for say 20 years, kicking off a Battanification process. Then the said notable quickly begins to give Battanian recruits.
IMHO these two features in combination would make the game map way more lively and dynamic and realistic. As it is, it's always the same old, same old, and it gets boring after some time.
