BEAST - Bannerlord Early Access Skirmish Tournament

[OurGloriousLeader]

Absolutely! But is a red dot in the middle of a player's screen, that's mainly playing cav and inf from what I know, a measurable reason for a 12:0 loss?
Don't get me wrong, the ban is absolutely justified, no debate needed, I'm just interested in the reason for the default loss since that seems quite harsh to me, maybe you can give me some more insight as the more experienced player?

Well if it's cheating, and you seem to agree, then the rounds played are default by the rules. I agree it's probably too harsh but that's clearly the reasoning.

I'd probably do a 1-2 match suspension and make a ruling on the use of the mod going forward.

 

[mrArgentum]

Well if it's cheating, and you seem to agree, then the rounds played are default by the rules. I agree it's probably too harsh but that's clearly the reasoning.

I'd probably do a 1-2 match suspension and make a ruling on the use of the mod going forward.

Developers of this game are not considering crosshair as cheating.

 

[The_Great_White]

Well if it's cheating, and you seem to agree, then the rounds played are default by the rules. I agree it's probably too harsh but that's clearly the reasoning.

I'd probably do a 1-2 match suspension and make a ruling on the use of the mod going forward.

Thanks alot!

 

[Namakan]

Developers of this game are not considering crosshair as cheating.

Developers of the game also consider class limits to not be needed, yet they are in place for BEAST.

Modifying game files to your advantage = ban. Losing rounds over that is reasonable IMO.

 

[angry man]

Developers of this game are not considering crosshair as cheating.

Get a load of this knucklehead ?

 

[OurGloriousLeader]

Developers of this game are not considering crosshair as cheating.

Developers made Bannerlord, their judgement is in question tbh.

 

[Varian♛]

If he already gives a **** and turns on a permanent crosshair during a stream, what else do you think he "mod" when the stream is not running?

 

[TheBard]

Developers of this game are not considering crosshair as cheating.

I will establish this once, what the developers think is nice and well, but they also consider class restrictions dumb, should I lift them therefore?
I had a very long discussion about the case, but let me establish one thing very clear, and it shall stand: I do care for the developers opinion, but in doubt, the rule set is what applies. If you are intend on breaking them, go forward. But then live with the fact that the rules are applied to administer punishment accordingly.

 

[Einarcf]

Well, as far as I heard, it was Nin3's answer, which I kinda take the most serious at of all them with regrads to the MP.

 

[mrArgentum]

I will establish this once, what the developers think is nice and well, but they also consider class restrictions dumb, should I lift them therefore?
I had a very long discussion about the case, but let me establish one thing very clear, and it shall stand: I do care for the developers opinion, but in doubt, the rule set is what applies. If you are intend on breaking them, go forward. But then live with the fact that the rules are applied to administer punishment accordingly.

You can establish whatever you want rules but you can't consider crosshair as cheating if developers are disagree with you. I guess they know better what is cheating in their game and what is not.

 

[TheBard]

You can establish whatever you want rules but you can't consider crosshair as cheating if developers are disagree with you. I guess they know better what is cheating in their game and what is not.

And I guess that exactly does not matter at this point, because of...

but in doubt, the rule set is what applies.

 

[WakaWaka]

You can establish whatever you want rules but you can't consider crosshair as cheating if developers are disagree with you. I guess they know better what is cheating in their game and what is not.

they also said that class limit is pointless. and cav is countering menavlion at b2, so meh, no they dont know what better in their own game.

 

[DonNeto]

Div vs DM - Tonight 20CET

 

[Jufasto]

RM vs HINQ tomorrow 20 cet Sunday

 

[Hairless]

DM 11(3):(1)4 Div

隐藏: Map 1

隐藏: Map 2

 

[Gotha]

DR 12(4):(0)1 VW

隐藏: Town Outskirts

隐藏: Echerion

I crashed on the last round on the 3rd set.
gg

 

[Silvernj]

HINQ 9 (2) - 8 (2) RM

隐藏: Screenshots

 

[Champion Relexan Forzen]

DM lost the war but won the battle.

 

[Aeronwen]

DM 11(3):(1)4 Div

隐藏: Map 1

隐藏: Map 2

***************************************************
Match Confirmation
roster updated, OP updated, main div updated
***************************************************

dasginta and entral added in the roster thread

DR 12(4):(0)1 VW

隐藏: Town Outskirts

隐藏: Echerion

I crashed on the last round on the 3rd set.
gg

***************************************************
Match Confirmation
roster updated, OP updated, main div updated
***************************************************

HINQ 9 (2) - 8 (2) RM

隐藏: Screenshots

***************************************************
Match Confirmation
roster updated, OP updated, main div updated
***************************************************

 

[Silvernj]

@Aeronwen, hinq vs rm results are wrong