[BCM] Group Stage Results - RED DIVISION

Orion

Still Not Worthy
Global Moderator
M&BWBWF&SNW
Best answers
0


RED DIVISION


ROUND 1

MAPS & FACTIONS

GROUP I
Hawkband
0
-​
12
Serious Warband


Rising Rivals
12
-​
0
House Forrester

GROUP II
Fallen Pride
2
-​
12
Inversed Brains


The Flaming Fist
12
-​
0
Unity Academy
 

Orion

Still Not Worthy
Global Moderator
M&BWBWF&SNW
Best answers
0

ROUND 2

MAPS & FACTIONS

GROUP I
Serious Warband
6
-​
7
Rising Rivals


House Forrester
0
-​
12
Lost in Lidl

GROUP II
Inversed Brains
9
-​
7
The Flaming Fist


Unity Academy
1
-​
12
Polish Eagles
 

Orion

Still Not Worthy
Global Moderator
M&BWBWF&SNW
Best answers
0

ROUND 3

MAPS & FACTIONS

GROUP I
Hawkband
12
-​
0
House Forrester


Lost in Lidl
5
-​
11
Rising Rivals

GROUP II
Fallen Pride
12
-​
1
Unity Academy


Polish Eagles
1
-​
12
The Flaming Fist
 

Orion

Still Not Worthy
Global Moderator
M&BWBWF&SNW
Best answers
0

ROUND 4

MAPS & FACTIONS

GROUP I
House Forrester
0
-​
12
Serious Warband


Hawkband
12
-​
0
Lost in Lidl

GROUP II
Unity Academy
1
-​
12
Inversed Brains


Fallen Pride
9
-​
4
Polish Eagles
 

Orion

Still Not Worthy
Global Moderator
M&BWBWF&SNW
Best answers
0

ROUND 5

MAPS & FACTIONS

GROUP I
Lost in Lidl
0
-​
12
Serious Warband


Hawkband
0
-​
12
Rising Rivals

GROUP II
Polish Eagles
0
-​
12
Inversed Brains


Fallen Pride
3
-​
12
The Flaming Fist



 

Orion

Still Not Worthy
Global Moderator
M&BWBWF&SNW
Best answers
0
SCORE REPORT FORM

Code:
[b]Group:[/b]
[b]Round:[/b]
[b]Date & Time:[/b]
[b]Server:[/b]
[b]Teams involved:[/b] Team A vs Team B 
[b]Result:[/b] 

[b]Screenshots:[/b]
[spoiler]
Map A Set 1:
Map A Set 2:
Map B Set 1:
Map B Set 2:

Printed IDs:
[/spoiler]

[b]Approved spectator list:[/b]
 

imemine

Sergeant Knight at Arms
Best answers
0
Calamity said:
... Every team has four matches total and one bye. Teams should play two matches a week (however you can play all four this weekend if all teams agree). You can play the fixtures in any order you want as long as you get all FOUR matches done by Wednesday August 29th.

Make sure you read the announcement Orion made regarding qualifier scheduling and rules: https://forums.taleworlds.com/index.php/topic,378279.msg9016509.html#msg9016509

The big one to pay attention to is:

Orion said:
§ 6 Scheduling
(3) During the Qualifiers, teams are expected to play two matches per week. If a team fails to play two matches within a week (measured incrementally from the beginning date of the qualifiers) then they must provide evidence of a good-faith attempt to schedule their match. Failure to do so will result in forfeiture of the match. Any match that remains unplayed at the end of the qualifiers will be considered forfeit by one or both teams (depending on aforementioned attempts to schedule).
Since I was just asked you need to play these matches on official BCM servers. We have 11 of them up. Please post when the matches are happening in the Server Booking Thread.
 

Jurgen

Knight
WBNWM&BWF&S
Best answers
0
Hawkband 12 vs 0 Forrester






Hawkband 5 vs 10 Lost in lidl

The next game was unsuccessful. The team Lidl did not gather 8 people. But Gibby said that we can play 8x7. The first rounds we won. Then they said that they would call for an emergency replacement - a mercenary player. Then something went wrong ... Everyone started to take off the Internet, and there was a problem with the connection. The next card they played as part of 8 people including an extra player. We flew 1 person, and now there were 7 of us, and there were 8. We continued the game. It was something incomprehensible. But thanks for the match. The winner uploads screenshots. If necessary, I can also provide them.

 

Gibby Jr

Marquis
Best answers
0
Jurgen said:
Hawkband 12 vs 0 Forrester






Hawkband 5 vs 10 Lost in lidl

The next game was unsuccessful. The team Lidl did not gather 8 people. But Gibby said that we can play 8x7. The first rounds we won. Then they said that they would call for an emergency replacement - a mercenary player. Then something went wrong ... Everyone started to take off the Internet, and there was a problem with the connection. The next card they played as part of 8 people including an extra player. We flew 1 person, and now there were 7 of us, and there were 8. We continued the game. It was something incomprehensible. But thanks for the match. The winner uploads screenshots. If necessary, I can also provide them.
I misunderstood the rules but it was corrected quickly; you didn't report any problems with connections or with dropping down to 7 players yourself, but Lidl using their emergency sub was perfectly within the rules. If you had a problem you should have contacted the admins about it
 

TalliE

Baron
WBNW
Best answers
0
- Rising Rivals vs House Forrester will be on Tuesday 21st, 19:00 BST.
- Rising Rivals vs Serious Warband will be on Tuesday 28st, 19:30 BST.

- Rising Rivals vs Hawkband will be on Monday 27th, time to be decided.
 

Orion

Still Not Worthy
Global Moderator
M&BWBWF&SNW
Best answers
0
Jurgen said:
Hawkband 12 vs 0 Forrester






Hawkband 5 vs 10 Lost in lidl

The next game was unsuccessful. The team Lidl did not gather 8 people. But Gibby said that we can play 8x7. The first rounds we won. Then they said that they would call for an emergency replacement - a mercenary player. Then something went wrong ... Everyone started to take off the Internet, and there was a problem with the connection. The next card they played as part of 8 people including an extra player. We flew 1 person, and now there were 7 of us, and there were 8. We continued the game. It was something incomprehensible. But thanks for the match. The winner uploads screenshots. If necessary, I can also provide them.
The results of these matches will be updated pending review by the administration. It is known to the administration that Hawkband had 8 players ready at the scheduled times for their matches, and that they waited the minimum amount of time specified in the rules (10 minutes) before contacting the administration about the delay of their match. Given the irregularities that occurred, we will be consulting with Hawkband as they were prepared to play at the scheduled time and dutifully reported the delays.

[Edit]
A conclusion has been reached, and Hawkband will be given a default win for their second match on the basis that they waited a sufficient amount of time for their opponent to gather players and reported the delay to the administration, thereby seeking a default win to which they are entitled by the rule quoted below. Screenshots submitted as proof are provided:

§ 12 Gathering Players

(1) Both teams have a grace period of 10 minutes after the agreed match start time to gather their players in the server. If a team fails to turn up with at least 8 players 10 minutes after the agreed match start, the other team may contact an admin and will be awarded a default win. If a team agrees to wait longer than 10 minutes for their opponent to finish gathering players, then they may wait up to 20 additional minutes (i.e. 30 minutes after the agreed time). If their opponent has still not gathered enough players, then an admin must be notified and a default win will be awarded.


[quote author=Orion]... going forward all approved spectators must be listed in your results posts (I will be editing the report forms to include this), and it is strongly recommended that you include them in your match announcement/booking post. Otherwise, these spectators risk being banned from all tournament servers. If they are members of a team in the tournament, then they are subject to the tournament rules regarding spectators.[/quote]
 

ZombieJR

Knight at Arms
Best answers
0
Is there a possibility of a replay? If Hawkband agree? I was on holiday and have not heard about this, hence missing the match. But to me it seems like a big mess.
 

TalliE

Baron
WBNW
Best answers
0
House Forrester sadly gave Rising Rivals the default due to not enough players.

Cray-Z can confirm.
 

imemine

Sergeant Knight at Arms
Best answers
0
Jurgen said:
Hawkband 12 vs 0 Forrester




...
Player names and ID verification:
Ranger_TomHat_Forrester (3518572) and Lord_Asher_Forrester (1615651) are both not registerd on the roster of House Forrester
Consequences of these irregularities are currently reviewed.


Group I, Round 1: Rising Rivals vs. House Forrester:
Default win for Rising Rivals
Tallie said:
House Forrester sadly gave Rising Rivals the default due to not enough players.

Cray-Z can confirm.
Cray-Z said:
Confirmed.


Berta said:
Unity Academy gave default win for TFF, due to not enough players. Elwaen can confirm.
Unity Academy please confirm or disapprove.