Battlefield > Call of Duty

olliewilliams01 · 2011-03-01

I just purchased Battlefield: Bad Company 2, and it's safe to say that I will never play Call of Duty again, unless I'm hanging out with a bunch of friends. Battlefield is just a much better designed and more realistic game. The only downside is that there is no splitscreen. In my opinion, that is the only reason it's not as popular as CoD. Hopefully they'll add in splitscreen for Battlefield 3, which is going to be EPIC.

Have ya'll seen the videos of the new game engine they're using? Amazing.

M&B should have destructible environments. Even though there are no explosions. Or catapults. Or battering rams. Or really anything that would cause enough damage to make destructible environments worthwhile. It would basically be a complete waste of time for the developers. BUT, it would still be cool.

Jhnking · 2011-03-01

Really, the whole thread so far is stupid. Just let this die or some admin lock it.

Almalexia · 2011-03-01

olliewilliams01 说:
M&B should have destructible environments. Even though there are no explosions. Or catapults. Or battering rams. Or really anything that would cause enough damage to make destructible environments worthwhile. It would basically be a complete waste of time for the developers. BUT, it would still be cool.

Mount and Musket actually had destructible buildings. Was cool stuff.

Jhnking · 2011-03-01

Tiberius Decimus Maximus 说:
olliewilliams01 说:

M&B should have destructible environments. Even though there are no explosions. Or catapults. Or battering rams. Or really anything that would cause enough damage to make destructible environments worthwhile. It would basically be a complete waste of time for the developers. BUT, it would still be cool.

点击展开...

Mount and Musket actually had destructible buildings. Was cool stuff.

Only HAD? It doesn't have em anymore?

olliewilliams01 · 2011-03-01

Tiberius Decimus Maximus 说:
olliewilliams01 说:

M&B should have destructible environments. Even though there are no explosions. Or catapults. Or battering rams. Or really anything that would cause enough damage to make destructible environments worthwhile. It would basically be a complete waste of time for the developers. BUT, it would still be cool.

点击展开...

Mount and Musket actually had destructible buildings. Was cool stuff.

that could be awesome, considering it's a gunpowder mod. I might have to check that out

Jhnking 说:
Really, the whole thread so far is stupid. Just let this die or some admin lock it.

what'd I do? Just wanted to start a convo about CoD and battlefield.... I'm gunna go cry now, if anybody needs me i'll be in the fetal position under my bed.

G36E · 2011-03-01

olliewilliams01 说:
I just purchased Battlefield: Bad Company 2, and it's safe to say that I will never play Call of Duty again, unless I'm hanging out with a bunch of friends. Battlefield is just a much better designed and more realistic game.

Both of them involve you playing as Wolverine Mk. II in ____ (Theater of war), say what?

olliewilliams01 说:
The only downside is that there is no splitscreen. In my opinion, that is the only reason it's not as popular as CoD. Hopefully they'll add in splitscreen for Battlefield 3, which is going to be EPIC.

Not going to happen. EA wants you to buy more games and consoles, so they'll never add splitscreen.

olliewilliams01 说:
Have ya'll seen the videos of the new game engine they're using? Amazing.

It looks pretty, but frankly this is an M&B forum, I doubt most of us are too interested with the graphics.

olliewilliams01 说:
M&B should have destructible environments. Even though there are no explosions. Or catapults. Or battering rams. Or really anything that would cause enough damage to make destructible environments worthwhile. It would basically be a complete waste of time for the developers. BUT, it would still be cool.

You opinion is now invalid.

Temuzu · 2011-03-01

Bad Company 2, eh. Send me a friend invite (Killed By [FIN] or somesuch)

Swadius 2.0 · 2011-03-01

Battlefield BC is awesome. I've never played the recent modern combat CoD series, but from what I could see on youtube, very little of it has anything else to do with running around and shooting other players with no strategy or teams whatsoever on maps you could probably fit into a moderately sized house.
I guess you could say the Arma series is the best out of all the shooters, but the the Battlefield series always had the perfect mixture of size of the field to the objectives needed to be taken in that game. In short, well made maps that don't squish everybody onto a tenth of a square kilometre.

olliewilliams01 · 2011-03-01

Swadius 说:
Battlefield BC is awesome. I've never played the recent modern combat CoD series, but from what I could see on youtube, very little of it has anything else to do with running around and shooting other players with no strategy or teams whatsoever on maps you could probably fit into a moderately sized house.
I guess you could say the Arma series is the best out of all the shooters, but the the Battlefield series always had the perfect mixture of size of the field to the objectives needed to be taken in that game. In short, well made maps that don't squish everybody onto a tenth of a square kilometre.

I totally agree, CoD is just who can shoot the most accurately while running. That's about it. Unless you're a camper.....

Arma is awesome, I love the build of the game, the scale, everything. The problem is it's actually.... too realistic to be that fun for me. I mean, walking for 20 mins to be randomly sniped kind of sucks. Like I said, I love the game, but I just can't bear (bare?) to play it for more than an hour or two.

KillerMongoose · 2011-03-01

Battlefield is much better, the maps are cooler, the combat is more strategic and the destructible environment and vehicles makes it so much better. There are few things funner than shooting down a helicopter charging at you firing rockets all around you only to kill the pilot with a pistol. Heavy Metal is the best map of them all, ecspecially for a sniper/mortar kit. Hiding in the mountains calling mortars on enemy occupied bases or helicopters that are about to take off.

Almalexia · 2011-03-01

Jhnking 说:
Only HAD? It doesn't have em anymore?

I was only speaking in the past tense because I haven't played it in a while. Should still have destructible buildings though.

Jhnking · 2011-03-01

Ah. Still, cannons don't play much of a role in the mod.

Tuckles · 2011-03-01

Yeah they do.

Mother****ing murderers in the siege maps.

Jhnking · 2011-03-01

Haven't seen many active siege servers for it.

Selcouth · 2011-03-01

I can guarantee you splitscreen did not affect the overall sales of blops. The game could of been the People Can Fly's 'Duty Calls' parody and people would still have eaten it up.

You also missed out on a lot of battlefield goodness starting off on BC2, to follow the topic title's format
2142 > 1942 > BF2 > BC2 > BC > Heroes

BC is still fun, it just doesn't feel totally battlefieldy

obligatory loopzook http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k-wFI9vTqto

Temuzu · 2011-03-01

Jhnking 说:
Haven't seen many active siege servers for it.

MM servers are only the 2nd most used ones, right after cRPG :roll:

MaHuD · 2011-03-02

There is no Siege anymore though. Thre was in Musket Madness, have yet to see it in MM

A_Mustang · 2011-03-02

PR is the only thing in the battlefield franchise worth playing. :lol:

((Exceptions drawn for FH2 ,FH, and 1942, which are merely 'decent' in comparison))

Chechen! · 2011-03-02

Comrade Temuzu 说:
Bad Company 2, eh. Send me a friend invite (Killed By [FIN] or somesuch)

I'll throw you an invite. You should add Austupaio too.

Battlefield > Call of Duty

正在查看此主题的用户

Sergeant at Arms

Master Knight

Her Flamboyance, the Calipha

Duke

Master Knight

Sergeant at Arms

Baron

Marquis

Grandmaster Knight

Sergeant at Arms

Sergeant Knight

Her Flamboyance, the Calipha

Duke

Master Knight

Count

Master Knight

Knight at Arms

Marquis

Section Moderator

Baron

Chechen!

类似的主题