Pointless comment. Nobody is asking for the game to be sitting in trenches for hours. You know FPS games don't have to be either an ultra realistic simulation or an arcadey COD game, right? Some people want a game that is slower paced than typical Battlefield games, which is totally reasonable.Cioss Julius U.X. said:Sitting in trenches for hours, waiting to attack order is not Battlefield. That'd be like Dungeons&Dragons II: Bannerlord.
Cioss Julius U.X. said:Sitting in trenches for hours, waiting to attack order is not Battlefield. That'd be like Dungeons&Dragons II: Bannerlord.
Funny thing is there is non. Battlefield has it's own fast-paced, vehicle and infantry balanced fighting athmosphere. They want it to be well-balanced not realistic nor historically accurate. That's why there are so many SMG's, semi-autos etc. Otherway around it would be ****ing boring with 95% of bolt-action mud warfare.Rigadoon said:Pointless comment.
Cioss Julius U.X. said:Funny thing is there is non. Battlefield has it's own fast-paced, vehicle and infantry balanced fighting athmosphere. They want it to be well-balanced not realistic nor historically accurate. That's why there are so many SMG's, semi-autos etc. Otherway around it would be ****ing boring with 95% of bolt-action mud warfare.Rigadoon said:Pointless comment.
Wellenbrecher said:The hell... that doesn't look like the Schutztruppe in Africa. They had Askaris serve in Europe as well?F.F.C._fritz said:
EMBRHACE DAS DIFERSITY, JA!
Well, maybe you can customize your character's trait? Or maybe they still have to work out on random facial skins (no pun intended) distribution, since black soldiers (Harlem Hellfighters i.e.) will be incuded, even if in other factions?
I can't find anything to support that...
Urgrevling said:Wasn't there a small black minority in Germany after WWI that was descended from African soldiers?
You are incredible narrow-minded. Games change over time. Battlefield itself used to be a slow paced and team focused but has changed drastically. It is not "*****ing" to want the series to try something different from its two fast paced predecessors, especially when the new setting creates such fresh opportunities for new gameplay. Maybe the rest of us were hoping for something more than a BF4 reskin.Cioss Julius U.X. said:Tactical shooters, realistic shooters, smulator shooters there are plenty of them. So *****ing abot Battlefield is not becoming one of them is totally meaningless.
I saw some improvements since BF4 -i hate Hardline-, like getting on vehicle animations, destructable surround even the ground itself. Vehicle animations is a major change, yes i know it's now something that big but until now all Battlefield games had instant using of vehicles. This is something new. Deploy menu is sexy too.
Warn, new post.
tl;dr