Battlefield 1

正在查看此主题的用户

How come? I thought it was quite a well made trailer.

I don't reckon the game will be great, though, nor do I think it's gonna be particularly realistic. And I probably won't buy it!
 
The whole "cool war fast moving supermobile infantry attacks exploding planes ominous big enemy zeppelin" just doesn't fit to ww1 tech and trench warfare, it feels completely dissonant.
 
I really doubt they are going realism. Meaning I sincerely doubt it's (proper) ww1 tech and trench warfare.  :lol:

They'll be going to make WW1 "cool" and "trendy". It'll paint a picture of WW1 just like lots of games in the past painted WW2.
 
Well yeah, that much is obvious. And that's my point :razz: Not as such so much that it's unrealistic, just that it completely doesn't fit.
 
"We did a lot of research and we discovered that the actual veterans of WW1 were all losers and babies, like literally all of them had PTSD or some made up medical crap to hide the fact they were gay. Modern audiences don't want to see that ****, so we're bringing sexy back to 1914, Michael Bay-style."
 
Amontadillo 说:
Well yeah, that much is obvious. And that's my point :razz: Not as such so much that it's unrealistic, just that it completely doesn't fit.
And there is, Verdun.
 
Amontadillo 说:
Well yeah, that much is obvious. And that's my point :razz: Not as such so much that it's unrealistic, just that it completely doesn't fit.

But most people don't really care, unfortunately.. How can the trailer feel dissonant if WW1 tech and trench warfare isn't what they are going for? I mean, it's dissonant with the reality, but this is escapism, dooooooooooood! :razz:

This is some cool alternative reality, so it needs a fitting trailer! It's about as historical as Chivalry!
 
So.. It looks awful because it doesn't fit to your expectations of how a realistic historical game should be?
I think it's pretty clear that they're not aiming it to be a realistic historical game. So why care about historical accuary?


Ninja'd
 
I love how it is ww1 and there are no French. Classic  :lol:

And I suppose awaiting the Russians, Austrians and Italians would be going too far, too. But maybe that fantasy Mamluk is Ottoman. lIn any way, that trailer looks horrendous. Also, nice dogfight in the Grand canyon.
 
Radalan 说:
So.. It looks awful because it doesn't fit to your expectations of how a realistic historical game should be?
I think it's pretty clear that they're not aiming it to be a realistic historical game. So why care about historical accuary?
...did you not manage to read what I wrote? :???:
It's not about realistic or not. Not really. It's just that the style they're going for completely doesn't fit the theme they've stated. It's nothing to do with realism, nor my expectations - I would never expect them to make a realistic ww1 game.

I just think that the trailer looks ridiculous.
 
MithrellaS 说:
Holy ****. :eek:

Well, instantly bought then. I like history. :razz:

Charlton-Heston-Crazy-laughing.gif
 
Jeeez, this forum's reaction is so ****ing predictable it hurts.  :lol:

"guies looook at does e'splosions1! theys not hustorucully accurut no00es! dis gaim iz gun B du wurst ever lul u all xuck for leiking it u gullable f00ls."  :facepalm:

 
Anyways, saw a breakdown of weapons shown in the trailer. There was some speculation that there were Carcano carbines at one point, thus suggesting the Italians are in, but even if that is not the case and they misidentified them, the helmets are definitely Adrians which would mean the French are in fact in.

*EDIT*

tumblr_inline_o6s8d9f42O1qapn73_540.jpg


Frame in question.
 
后退
顶部 底部