Anarchy or Government?

[Almalexia]

Which do you believe is more effective/enjoyable? Each one has it's pro's and con's, but lets see what your opinion is.

 

[Almalexia]

To continue from another thread:

Both when fighting large prey.

Well, if you have multiple people, it would be less likely to reach you at all, as more arrows mean a few would be more likely to hit the beast, and more likely to kill it.

 

[Sushiman70]

Anarchy is definitely more enjoyable, but an anarchist regime would collapse within seconds of someone establishing, because anarchists are anarchists. 

 

[Almalexia]

Anarchy is definitely more enjoyable, but an anarchist regime would collapse within seconds of someone establishing, because anarchists are anarchists.

Wait, a anarchist regime? 

 

[Cyborg Eastern European]

It's more fun in anarchy.

 

[Sushiman70]

Ok, and anarchist government...

 

[Kobrag]

But more people can screw up too, and an injured man/woman can be a burden.

Or an extra supply of food? Pros and cons.

 

[ealabor]

Light government, of course.


A government should take care of the essentials; national defense, infrastructure, and **** off when it comes to everything else.

Theres nothing that pisses me off more than a bureaucracy with it's hands in all of your money, and has a say in everyones affairs.

 

[Kobrag]

Ok, and anarchist government...

Anarchy = lack of an official government.

 

[Almalexia]

But more people can screw up too, and an injureed man/woman can be a burden.

Or an extra supply of food? Pros and cons.

Also, you can get more materials other than food from a larger animal. For example, if a guy's leg gets broken bringing down a large moose, they can use a few of it's bones to make a splint, or to make more weapons, when if you kill a small deer or rabbit, you just gets some meat, and maybe some small bones to carve for decoration.

 

[Sushiman70]

Well no duh... Anyway, Anarchy rules!!

 

[Almalexia]

Well no duh... Anyway, Anarchy rules!!

But would not function in a modern enviroment. So if you want at least 5 billion of the world's population to die of, go ahead.

 

[Cyborg Eastern European]

Okay.
When do we start?

 

[Sushiman70]

Which do you believe is more effective/enjoyable?

Does it have to work, that takes out all the fun.

 

[Kobrag]

As an idea.
A rotary leadership could be good instead of a democratic one.


Think of it as a succession game in dwarf fortress, after a week or so you give power to a random guy or get shot.

 

[Almalexia]

Okay.
When do we start?

Oh come on. Even I could not live with the fact that I, or the people I worked with, caused the death of 5 billion people. That would be mind shattering.

 

[mdk31]

I'd prefer a smallish government. One that does not regulate private lives, but is capable of regulating the economy and the like. Also, one that is capable of maintaining a good military for defense.

 

[Cyborg Eastern European]

Oh come on. Even I could not live with the fact that I, or the people I worked with, caused the death of 5 billion people. That would be mind shattering.

You see.
There's the difference between us.

 

[Kobrag]

We are over populated as it is, some would have to go as a nessesity.

 

[Mage246]

I've seen pictures of you, you'd be one of the first to go.