8 years of training, we can deal with itBannerlord speculation masterrace
8 years of training, we can deal with itBannerlord speculation masterrace
Maybe they're disregarding that 1.1.0 is a big patch and it's just a regular patch like we've been seeing the past week
How do you know they are using semantic versioning ?That's not really how versioning works... it's not merely adding up numbers. If that were the case why not simply use a single number system?
I can only hope that 1.1.0 is actually coming -- given the warning not to expect a big content patch from yesterday, it's possible 1.1.0 contains less than we expect -- but I still have to imagine it has *something*.
Or better yet. I want to imagine that it has something.
Not sure when or how these rumours started but there is no secret big patch in the pipeline just yet.
How do you know they are using semantic versioning ?
Why implement a part of gameplay can't be done in a standard maj ? I don't think they care about numbers. But it's an interesting question we will see it soonIt would be pretty odd to use a three numbers versioning system where there's no difference between the numbers. Even if it's not 100% up to the spec (nothing really is), you'd still expect a middle number increment to mean more than merely "we fixed bugs".
Well, even if they say, no big patch, it still can be a small content patch instead of a mostly bug fixes patch, but lets seeYes that is exactly what I was referring to.
You are fastThe branch 1.0.10 was just added -- so that answers that.
Yea wth1.0.10 was also instantly removed. Maybe someone missclicked and meant to push out 1.1.0 ; )