So Ubisoft and Nintendo are indie devs. Got it.
So Ubisoft and Nintendo are indie devs. Got it.
List of indie game developers - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
List of indie game developers - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Lol!! that list has CCP Games which was bought by Pearl Abyss in 2018 for like half a billion dollars. Dem lil guys!
Get back to me when Pearl Abyss buys Taleworlds
List of indie game developers - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Ah, Wikipedia. What could possibly go wrong when a bunch of people who prefer verifiability over accuracy of information start writing down articles that then gets used as a source.People will still don't get it sadly.
In the video game industry, an independent (indie) game refers to games typically created by individuals or smaller development teams without the financial support of a large game publisher, in contrast to most "AAA games".
The point is they were worth half a billion and had over 300 employees spread over 3 different development sites. Basically ANY company can be indie if they can hahaha. Don't get all butthurt just pointing out the fact that it's hilarious.
Butthurt, me?
Who are "they"... Taleworlds or CCP?
I work for a locally owned huge company. Our competitors are national companies owned by conglomerates, like Ingersoll-Rand and Johnson Controls. While the owner of my company is a billionaire, we feel pretty indie compared to our competitors. Taleworlds may be doing well, but they ain't no AAA company yet.
Independent developers, which can be single individuals, small groups, or large organizations, retain operational control over their organizations and processes.Whoops! A business with over 100 people is not considered a small business in most parts of the world I'm rather sure.
Yes, you.
Your company is independently privately owned. You wouldn't compare yourself to a mom and pop shop would you? Of course not, I work for a independent company myself but we're still not a small business in that regard. Comparing companies like CCP and TW to guys working in their basement on a passion project or a dozen dudes just trying to put something out is disingenuous. They're independent indeed, but to associate the word "indie" and the images conjured by that word among gamers just isn't right or fair to those little guys.
If I have done anything to show any level of animosity or "butt hurt", I apologize. I am interested in the conversation and I realize that on the internet neither of us will change each others mind but I enjoy other viewpoints.
they are not the level of mom & pop that they were when they started, but compared to their competition where would they fall? Would you consider them AAA? To me, once they release another title unrelated to Bannerlord, or possible make multiple games simultaneously there may be an indication of leaving indie status. They are definitely growing through growing pains right now. I'm curious how it goes for them.
Says the guy who referred to Wikipedia just a few posts ago....Ah, Wikipedia. What could possibly go wrong when a bunch of people who prefer verifiability over accuracy of information start writing down articles that then gets used as a source.
If you can't see the difference between Taleworlds, Nintendo and Ubisoft there is not much point in discussing it any further.Then perhaps you should actually tell me why they supposedly aren't comparable instead of just claiming it is so. What you have offered thus far has been rather silly, like if they do other business besides development You could explain to me how that is supposedly a disqualifying reason from the label indie. Also, I'd wager most people wouldn't classify a studio with more than 100 employees as indie, but hey, with your weird definitions everything seems to be possible.
The point was not only to illustrate how Wikipedia can be unreliable source, but that even then it still agreed with me in the end. Well, content made by some editors did. If you were referring to when I said to read about the wiki article about Ubisoft's first party development, that information is verifiable externally or by using the sources listed in the article, something that did not apply to the list provided by that other user as it uses almost no sources as the basis of the information contained within especially with the part where it tries to define what an indie dev is.Says the guy who referred to Wikipedia just a few posts ago....![]()